Judge Joe Brown says Rittenhouse was acting in Self Defense.
- Thread starter ViShawn
- Start date
Vandelay
Life is absurd. Lean into it.
I stick up for older folk often, but sometimes you just outlive your usefulness. JB been saying a good bit of bullshyt recently.
Using events from Woodrow Wilson's administration is at best misguided, at worst absurd.
Self-defense when you provoked the situation WITH a deadly weapon is not exactly a grey area...maybe at best Kyle is overcharged here. Using this logic, I would assume he believes Zimmerman is innocent.
Using events from Woodrow Wilson's administration is at best misguided, at worst absurd.
Self-defense when you provoked the situation WITH a deadly weapon is not exactly a grey area...maybe at best Kyle is overcharged here. Using this logic, I would assume he believes Zimmerman is innocent.
CreepyMcCreeperson
Veteran
He was. But he was walking around with an assault rifle waving it at people. That is going to illicit a hostile response. Those men thought a mass shooting was about to happen, and tried to stop him.
Both things can be true.
Both things can be true.
DatNkkaCutty
Veteran
JB is a clout-chaser now. 
In that split second, sure. But his entire reason for being there was to get baited into killing people.
Right. He fukked around and found out.
Our ancestors fought for equal protection under the law.. The same protection the black panthers had when they went into the state house with shot guns..
You don't change the laws, you make it available to everyone.. So therefore, everyone knows they can get it because we're all EQUALLY protected.. You can defend yourself the same way I can..
When we do the same thing, and we're doing it within that same law, we're criminalized.. That's the issue here.
You don't change the laws, you make it available to everyone.. So therefore, everyone knows they can get it because we're all EQUALLY protected.. You can defend yourself the same way I can..
When we do the same thing, and we're doing it within that same law, we're criminalized.. That's the issue here.
The surviving person changed his story so many times. First he said that he thought he was an active shooter. Then he said that Kyle didn't shoot him until HE himself drew his handgun. Then he said he tried to defend his life and shoot, but not shoot to kill.
So if you thought Kyle was an active shooter with an "assault rifle" you're not going to shoot to kill him so yourself or no one else dies and he only pointed it at you when YOU pointed your gun at him?
Totally understand. It seems like folks want to make an example out of him but it's clear cut self defense for me.
Zimmerman should be locked up.
Chauvin should be locked up.
Kyle...eh...misdemeanor charges but was it murder? I can't accurately say that.
The fact that he was under 17 is more than likely going to be what does him in and him be found guilty. The self-defense argument shouldn't hold any weight as he was technically never legally suppose to open carry those guns anyways.
Trust Me
Coli Prophet
The surviving person changed his story so many times. First he said that he thought he was an active shooter. Then he said that Kyle didn't shoot him until HE himself drew his handgun. Then he said he tried to defend his life and shoot, but not shoot to kill.
So if you thought Kyle was an active shooter with an "assault rifle" you're not going to shoot to kill him so yourself or no one else dies and he only pointed it at you when YOU pointed your gun at him?
Totally understand. It seems like folks want to make an example out of him but it's clear cut self defense for me.
Zimmerman should be locked up.
Chauvin should be locked up.
Kyle...eh...misdemeanor charges but was it murder? I can't accurately say that.
Wow.
Just… wow.
That charge got thrown out. It maybe could have been a fine or at most a 9 month sentence.
The premise was from what I read was the barrel length of the rifle was within legality. The Wisconsin law on it was unclear.
Ahhh so they're trying to use the ambiguity of the law to muddy the waters and force a mistrial.
Trust Me
Coli Prophet
Bingo.
They goin for ‘if he legally had the gun in his hands, then this needs to be thrown out’
And in this court room.. they might get it.
I'd rather them have a hung jury and mistrial while saving the fight for a later date rather than the judge trying to force a decision out of the jury as it can go either way.
That’s the problem. This is how the law SHOULD work for us. It doesn’t.
