KAMALA HARRIS PASSES ANTI-LYNCHING BILL!

storyteller

Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
17,240
Reputation
5,552
Daps
65,687
Reppin
NYC


...fukk her.


WOW! I usually do extra digging because of how rhetoric gets flipped in politics (from think tank names to bill titles to every Dem claiming they're a progressive these days), but I figured it'd be too cynical to second guess any legislation that bans "lynching" ...I should have known better by now. :snoop: Ima have to check the definitions in the bill itself to see if the language is clear enough now.
 
Last edited:

Cole Cash

They took a hammer and sickle to my back
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,760
Reputation
7,401
Daps
30,844
Reppin
Baltimore Maryland
WOW! I usually do extra digging because of how rhetoric gets flipped in politics (from think tank names to bill titles to every Dem claiming they're a progressive these days), but I figured it'd be too cynical to second guess any legislation that bans "lynching" ...I should have known better by now. :snoop: Ima have to check the definitions in the bill itself to see if the language is clear enough now.

A lot of people here can’t stsnd that her. Just because I would go raw doesn’t mean I want her as president
 

Wargames

One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
28,399
Reputation
5,636
Daps
107,529
Reppin
New York City
WOW! I usually do extra digging because of how rhetoric gets flipped in politics (from think tank names to bill titles to every Dem claiming they're a progressive these days), but I figured it'd be too cynical to second guess any legislation that bans "lynching" ...I should have known better by now. :snoop: Ima have to check the definitions in the bill itself to see if the language is clear enough now.

Honestly that never occurred to me either. That shyt has me stunned at the levels of cynicism involved in this
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
24,605
Reputation
10,883
Daps
105,902
Reppin
Detroit


...fukk her.

Come on. The language in the bill being discussed in this thread is very specific. The article you quoted is something very broad and wouldn't fall under this.

From that article:

OPD Arrests Protesters for 'Lynching'
"Oakland police invoke a provocatively named law that doesn't mean what you think it means."

wrt the bill in question:

You can find the text here: S.3178 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Justice for Victims of Lynching Act of 2018

NPR has an article on it from June:

"Congress's three African-American senators introduced a bipartisan bill Friday to make lynching a federal crime.

Sens. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., Cory Booker, D-N.J., and Tim Scott, R-S.C., drafted the bipartisan legislation, which defines the crime as "the willful act of murder by a collection of people assembled with the intention of committing an act of violence upon any person." It also classifies lynching as a hate crime that would warrant enhanced sentences.

"It's a travesty that despite repeated attempts to do so, Congress still hasn't put anti-lynching legislation on the books," Booker said in a statement. "This bill will right historical wrongs by acknowledging our country's stained past and codifying into law our commitment to abolishing this shameful practice."

The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act of 2018 notes that during the first half of the 20th century nearly 200 attempts to pass anti-lynching legislation failed to gain support from the Senate despite urging from seven sitting presidents.

It also cites statistics supported by research compiled by Tuskegee University, that more than 4,700 people were lynched between the years 1882 and 1968. About three-quarters of the victims were African-American. And according to the bill, "99 percent of all perpetrators of lynching escaped from punishment by state or local officials."


African-American Senators Introduce Anti-Lynching Bill
 

Wargames

One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
28,399
Reputation
5,636
Daps
107,529
Reppin
New York City
Come on. The language in the bill being discussed in this thread is very specific. The article you quoted is something very broad and wouldn't fall under this.

From that article:

OPD Arrests Protesters for 'Lynching'
"Oakland police invoke a provocatively named law that doesn't mean what you think it means."

wrt the bill in question:

You can find the text here: S.3178 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Justice for Victims of Lynching Act of 2018

NPR has an article on it from June:

"Congress's three African-American senators introduced a bipartisan bill Friday to make lynching a federal crime.

Sens. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., Cory Booker, D-N.J., and Tim Scott, R-S.C., drafted the bipartisan legislation, which defines the crime as "the willful act of murder by a collection of people assembled with the intention of committing an act of violence upon any person." It also classifies lynching as a hate crime that would warrant enhanced sentences.

"It's a travesty that despite repeated attempts to do so, Congress still hasn't put anti-lynching legislation on the books," Booker said in a statement. "This bill will right historical wrongs by acknowledging our country's stained past and codifying into law our commitment to abolishing this shameful practice."

The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act of 2018 notes that during the first half of the 20th century nearly 200 attempts to pass anti-lynching legislation failed to gain support from the Senate despite urging from seven sitting presidents.

It also cites statistics supported by research compiled by Tuskegee University, that more than 4,700 people were lynched between the years 1882 and 1968. About three-quarters of the victims were African-American. And according to the bill, "99 percent of all perpetrators of lynching escaped from punishment by state or local officials."


African-American Senators Introduce Anti-Lynching Bill

This is very specific and clarifies the issue. Thanks for posting that and this law is actually much more functional than even what we thought it was based on the common understanding of a lynching and involves the murder by a mob for hate based reasons. I wonder could it be used like a conspiracy charge or something added on to a murder charge like assault with intent to kill.
 
Top