Just stop. In order to even be in position to win a game you have to do things in the earlier part to make it possible to win.
Yes this was made based off the Romo interception. How many teams have kept up with the Broncos this year? One. The cowboys. Why? Romo. No he didn't do it by himself but he had a career day and people are ignoring that over ONE play. Who's to say that Dallas should have let them scored with 1:45 left. What if Dez didn't fumble?
My point is, in sports people make it seem like you can play like shyt for most of the game and then suddenly be in it. Unless you're Tim Tebow than you have to do something right to be in position to win.
Give Romo and others props even when you think they ''choked''. Dallas aren't in that game without his mobility and improvising.
Yes this was made based off the Romo interception. How many teams have kept up with the Broncos this year? One. The cowboys. Why? Romo. No he didn't do it by himself but he had a career day and people are ignoring that over ONE play. Who's to say that Dallas should have let them scored with 1:45 left. What if Dez didn't fumble?
My point is, in sports people make it seem like you can play like shyt for most of the game and then suddenly be in it. Unless you're Tim Tebow than you have to do something right to be in position to win.
Give Romo and others props even when you think they ''choked''. Dallas aren't in that game without his mobility and improvising.

In a tit for tat game, when everybody is evenly matched, it is often one or 2 differences that make the difference.