Ferrum Phos
Banned
https://www.nature.com/articles/npjgenmed201618
Abstract: Genetic susceptibility to lead poisoning—A case report
Full text: http://medind.nic.in/iaf/t07/i2/iaft07i2p162.pdf
https://www.lead.org.au/fs/Fact_sheet-Nutrients_that_reduce_lead_poisoning_June_2010.pdf
A key factor, which almost certainly affects the range of susceptibility to lead poisoning, is a child’s genetic makeup. Current models for the neurotoxic effects of lead implicate the enzyme arylsulfatase A (ASA) as a particularly significant target of lead in the central nervous system (CNS).7. Reduced levels of cellular ASA by lead has been suggested to augment the other detrimental affects of the metal, resulting in the death or impaired function of oligodendroglia progenitor cells (OPCs) and lead to CNS dysfunction. Certain single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the gene for ASA (ARSA) cause greatly reduced levels of the enzyme with no obvious phenotype. One of these (Asn350Ser), first characterised in 1989,8 when homozygous, causes up to a 60% reduction in the intracellular levels of the enzyme.9 The homozygous presentation results in metachromatic leukodystrophy, leading to loss of developmental milestones in children and death at a young age. Low ASA activity in individuals with a heterozygous presentation can be identified via signs and symptoms, and it is suggested that these symptoms may be amplified when the individual is exposed to even low levels of environmental lead.4 Some symptoms of this heterozygous pseudodeficiency and environmental lead exposure may include: learning disabilities; behaviour problems' high blood pressure; tremors; seizure disorder; low sperm count and so on. This SNP is of particular relevance to the current situation in Flint, MI because a study conducted by one of us (J.Y.T.) and colleagues in 2002 of 107 African-American children in Detroit showed that this population had a gene frequency of ~0.45 for the Asn350Ser SNP, heterozygosity at this position often referred to as a pseudodeficiency. This frequency is much higher than what is seen in people of European ancestry (CEU=0.14) and higher frequency of this allele has been consistently reported in populations of African ancestry (ASW=0.36).10 These findings suggest that the Flint, MI population suffering lead exposure requires a more effective approach than simply measuring lead levels and setting a cutoff at 5 μg/dl. The question of the appropriate response to the interaction of genetics and lead toxicity was recently commented on by Poretz7 who stated ‘Identification of susceptible children for targeted concern and treatment would help alleviate the impact of the toxicant on the at-risk population.’ We agree strongly with this premise. Genotyping, followed by targeted intervention in Flint, of children who are at higher risk for lead poisoning should be carried out immediately, particularly for those who test below the poison mark. The current cutoff for clinical intervention at 5 μg/dl is inadequate and incorrect, especially for children who are carriers or homozygous for the Asn350Ser SNP.
Abstract: Genetic susceptibility to lead poisoning—A case report
Full text: http://medind.nic.in/iaf/t07/i2/iaft07i2p162.pdf
Genotype frequencies vary by geography and race. ALAD-2 is the rarer of the two alleles and has been associated with high blood lead levels. In comparison, African and Asian populations have a low ALAD-2 allele frequency with few or no ALAD-2 homozygotes found in such populations (9). It has been thought to increase the risk of lead toxicity by generating a protein that binds lead more tightly than the ALAD-1 protein. Other evidence suggests that ALAD-2 may confer resistance to the harmful effects of lead by sequestering lead and making it unavailable for pathophysiologic participation. (7) Recent studies have however, showed that individuals who are homozygous for the ALAD-1 allele have a higher cortical bone lead level. This implies that these individuals may have greater body burden of lead and may be at a higher risk of the longterm effects of lead.
https://www.lead.org.au/fs/Fact_sheet-Nutrients_that_reduce_lead_poisoning_June_2010.pdf
REDUCING LEAD ABSORPTION
For reducing lead absorption the key nutrients appear to be vitamin C, calcium, iron and, to a lesser degree, zinc and phosphorus. Dietary deficiencies in any of these can increase lead absorption, though supplementation of individuals with already high levels of these nutrients in their diet may not have much impact on lead absorption. Further, since these minerals compete with, or alter lead absorption during digestion, taking concentrated supplements at one point of time, unless you are deficient in that particular nutrient, may not affect continuing lead absorption, once the supplements have been processed through a particular stage of digestion. Vitamin D and folate (vitamin B9) can actually increase lead absorption, but have offsetting advantages: vitamin D can play a role in decreasing the quantity of lead stored in the bone, while folate seems to increase excretion more than it increases absorption.
INCREASING LEAD EXCRETION
For increasing lead excretion, two low toxicity B group vitamins have had widely demonstrated impacts in animal studies: B1 (thiamine or thiamin), which specifically increases excretion from the brain, and B9 (folate or folic acid); both are now compulsory additives in non–organic bread inside Australia. Vitamin B6 can increase lead excretion in animals, but there are few studies to draw conclusions from.
Vitamin C has chelating (metal binding) properties, and can increase lead excretion, but its impacts on excretion have not always been consistently demonstrated, particularly at higher lead levels. Pectin also has been linked to higher lead excretion, but questions have been raised as to its degree of effectiveness. For reducing blood lead levels, vitamin C, vitamin E, thiamine (B1), folate (B9) and iron have the strongest and most consistent blood lead links.