Doobie Doo
Veteran
Lena Dunham: The Word 'Alleged' Is 'Sickening'
Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP
BY:
AMANDA PRESTIGIACOMO
FEBRUARY 23, 2016
12 Comments1190
On Tuesday, Girls star and self-described “sexual predator” Lena Dunham wrote a piece concerning pop star Kesha in her Lenny newsletter, in which she declared that the word “alleged,” although unfortunately necessary, is “sickening.”
To Dunham, if someone simply states that they have been a victim of the crime, the one accused—without as much as a shred of evidence against them—would preferably be punished, no questions asked. Apparently, being innocent until proven guilty, in the eyes of this insufferable Republican-bashing feminist, is a blemish on the American legal system.
“When I saw the outcome of Kesha’s court case last Friday, I felt sick. Actually sick — I wanted to ask my Uber to pull over so I could throw up in a New York City trash can,” started Dunham. “The photos of her beautiful face crumpled with tears, the legally necessary but sickening use of the word ‘alleged’ over and over in reference to the assault she says she remembers so vividly — it all created a special brand of nausea that comes when public events intersect with your most private triggers.”
Dunham was referring to Kesha’s recent court battle with Sony; the pop star wanted out of her contract and claimed that she was sexually abused by her producer, who goes by the name Dr. Luke, and thus could no longer work with the company. The judge cited that there was “no evidence” to Kesha’s claim of assault and Sony promised that the singer would never have contact with the producer even though no such evidence criminalizing the man accused existed.
The man Kesha accused of sexual abuse responded via Twitter:
Again, the whole “no evidence” thing was not good enough for Dunham; in her far-removed from reality world, a simple accusation from a woman against a man is preferably reason enough to legally punish.
Here, Dunham is pushing the supremely exaggerated leftist “rape-culture” narrative. This false narrative has helped lead countless men to be branded and victimized by women who falsely accuse of them of rape or sexual assault. For instance, Rolling Stone published a made-up story about a “gang rape” on a college campus, later proven false, in effort to perpetuate the “rape-culture” myth. The well-publicized Duke Lacrosse rape case was also another falsehood pushed by those in Dunham’s crowd, a crowd so hell-bent on their male-hating-female-victimizing narrative that real justice falls by the wayside.
Of course, Dunham is full of it for another reason, too. Ms. Female Empowerment is stumping for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Yes, that would be the woman who has “allegedly” threatened, in efforts to silence, her own husband’s sexual assault victims. One wonders if Ms. Dunham carries over her same “sickening” feeling when it comes to those women’s “alleged” claims.
Last but not least, adding more irony to Dunham’s anti-American notion: Dunham herself is a self-described “sexual predator.”
The feminist explained in her memoir Not That Kind of Girlthat she would experiment sexually with her six-year-younger sister, writing that she would use “anything a sexual predator might do” to try to get her sister to kiss her. Dunham also disturbingly recalled spreading open her sister’s vagina and looking “inside.”
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
So, according to sexual-deviant Dunham, preferably, any woman who so much as claims that she is a victim of a crime should be believed, and the one accused should be legally punished and branded a guilty man without even a shred of evidence. Unless, of course, Bill Clinton “allegedly” raped you. Then you can go to hell.
Lena Dunham: The Word 'Alleged' Is 'Sickening'
Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP
BY:
AMANDA PRESTIGIACOMO
FEBRUARY 23, 2016
12 Comments1190
On Tuesday, Girls star and self-described “sexual predator” Lena Dunham wrote a piece concerning pop star Kesha in her Lenny newsletter, in which she declared that the word “alleged,” although unfortunately necessary, is “sickening.”
To Dunham, if someone simply states that they have been a victim of the crime, the one accused—without as much as a shred of evidence against them—would preferably be punished, no questions asked. Apparently, being innocent until proven guilty, in the eyes of this insufferable Republican-bashing feminist, is a blemish on the American legal system.
“When I saw the outcome of Kesha’s court case last Friday, I felt sick. Actually sick — I wanted to ask my Uber to pull over so I could throw up in a New York City trash can,” started Dunham. “The photos of her beautiful face crumpled with tears, the legally necessary but sickening use of the word ‘alleged’ over and over in reference to the assault she says she remembers so vividly — it all created a special brand of nausea that comes when public events intersect with your most private triggers.”
Dunham was referring to Kesha’s recent court battle with Sony; the pop star wanted out of her contract and claimed that she was sexually abused by her producer, who goes by the name Dr. Luke, and thus could no longer work with the company. The judge cited that there was “no evidence” to Kesha’s claim of assault and Sony promised that the singer would never have contact with the producer even though no such evidence criminalizing the man accused existed.
The man Kesha accused of sexual abuse responded via Twitter:
Again, the whole “no evidence” thing was not good enough for Dunham; in her far-removed from reality world, a simple accusation from a woman against a man is preferably reason enough to legally punish.
Here, Dunham is pushing the supremely exaggerated leftist “rape-culture” narrative. This false narrative has helped lead countless men to be branded and victimized by women who falsely accuse of them of rape or sexual assault. For instance, Rolling Stone published a made-up story about a “gang rape” on a college campus, later proven false, in effort to perpetuate the “rape-culture” myth. The well-publicized Duke Lacrosse rape case was also another falsehood pushed by those in Dunham’s crowd, a crowd so hell-bent on their male-hating-female-victimizing narrative that real justice falls by the wayside.
Of course, Dunham is full of it for another reason, too. Ms. Female Empowerment is stumping for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Yes, that would be the woman who has “allegedly” threatened, in efforts to silence, her own husband’s sexual assault victims. One wonders if Ms. Dunham carries over her same “sickening” feeling when it comes to those women’s “alleged” claims.
Last but not least, adding more irony to Dunham’s anti-American notion: Dunham herself is a self-described “sexual predator.”
The feminist explained in her memoir Not That Kind of Girlthat she would experiment sexually with her six-year-younger sister, writing that she would use “anything a sexual predator might do” to try to get her sister to kiss her. Dunham also disturbingly recalled spreading open her sister’s vagina and looking “inside.”
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
-
- Lena Dunham: Woman Who Allegedly Silenced Victims of Sexual Abuse Has ‘Impressive’ Record ‘Protecting Women’
AMANDA PRESTIGIACOMO -
Wanda Sykes Calls The Republican Party A Terrorist Group On Canadian TV
CHASE STEPHENS
So, according to sexual-deviant Dunham, preferably, any woman who so much as claims that she is a victim of a crime should be believed, and the one accused should be legally punished and branded a guilty man without even a shred of evidence. Unless, of course, Bill Clinton “allegedly” raped you. Then you can go to hell.
Lena Dunham: The Word 'Alleged' Is 'Sickening'
I see what u did there
