They go harder on Kellz than any white male rapist ever did.
That might be true. But at least in Kellz's case there was a lot of evidence before you get to these documentary series. That's why someone like Avenatti gets to talk so sure. It's a layup.
Weinstein finally got some heat on him comparable to Kellz. The difference is that for the most part, the documentaries get obfuscated and aren't made to be a cable TV event, when they could easily do so.
I've no problem with this follow up other than it could potentially taint a jury pool.
Where my beef is, is how transparently, guilty or not, the accused who are black, are quickly made the face of whatever "problem" exists.
Weinstein is out here on his

but it won't get the same energy, despite the stack of receipts against him. At best, they'll use him as a "look at what X did! It's the same!"