Nikka swole af

I think the team owners are looking into this as a mascot.
![]()
'![]()
![]()
Thunder is no longer with us
Both for OKC reasons and he doesn't fit the "new" throwback look of the dubs
Oddly enough, the LA Lakers are originally from Minneapolis where there are the lakes as there are no lakes in LA.
LA has no original basketball team. Think about that.
that's him in a throwback, nothing to do with the decision they made when moving forward
SMH @ "THERE ARE NO LAKES IN L.A."
PASS THAT SHIIT HOMIE
BTW...LAKERS ARE ORIGINALLY FROM DETROIT, NOT MINNEAPOLIS.
But they were called the Gems in Detroit. It was in Minneapolis that they got the Lakers name.SMH @ "THERE ARE NO LAKES IN L.A."
PASS THAT SHIIT HOMIE
BTW...LAKERS ARE ORIGINALLY FROM DETROIT, NOT MINNEAPOLIS.
that's him in a throwback, nothing to do with the decision they made when moving forward
No the lakers originated in minnepolis. The team in detroit was called the gems.
NO DOUBT, BUT THE REASON HE GOT REMOVED WAS BECAUSE OF HIS NAME, NOT CUZ HE DINT FIT THE THEME
Thunder Enlightening – Whatever happened to the Golden State Warriors’ mascot? « Culture & Features « Peninsula Press ARCHIVE (2010 – Sept. 2014)Walker also pointed out the Warriors’ decision to revert back to its old-school logo and colors. The emblem and uniforms prior to the 2008 season actually carried Thunder’s likeness, and until this season the same color scheme had been used. In Walker’s opinion, the team had already planned this change when it decided to leave Thunder’s position vacant.
“I don’t necessarily think the mascot didn’t work for the market, I just think they had a character they didn’t feel was the best fit for the organization,” Walker said. “And the timing was probably good with the Oklahoma City Thunder adopting another name. From a PR standpoint, I think it was good timing.”