NFL: No evidence of Rudolph using racial slur
This is why you have to read between the lines. The NFL isn't objective here. They are trying to protect their product. Look at this headline. It could have easily read, the NFL found no proof to disprove Garret's claims. If they knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that Garrett was lying they would have said so. If they knew that Rudolph was innocent, they would have said though. Instead, their search was inconclusive, so they create a headline where Rudolph is innocent and Garrett is a liar. This is why a 3rd party needs to investigate. Even if the NFL found evidence, they would probably table it.
This is why you have to read between the lines. The NFL isn't objective here. They are trying to protect their product. Look at this headline. It could have easily read, the NFL found no proof to disprove Garret's claims. If they knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that Garrett was lying they would have said so. If they knew that Rudolph was innocent, they would have said though. Instead, their search was inconclusive, so they create a headline where Rudolph is innocent and Garrett is a liar. This is why a 3rd party needs to investigate. Even if the NFL found evidence, they would probably table it.



