Meet the Filthy Rich War Hawks that Make up Biden’s New Foreign Policy Team

[loyola llothta]

The source you posted is Mint Press, and they absolutely have an agenda.

The source to the information is in the hyper link in the article. Do you want me to post the hyperlink from the source for you to see again? Or do you want me to post more site thats not mint press that repeat the same main points.Do you want me to post that as well?

you clearly didn’t read the article but go ahead and tell me how you feel about mint press “agenda”

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

The source to the information is in the hyper link in the article. Do you want me to post the hyperlink from the source for you to see again? Or do you want me to post more site thats not mint press that repeat the same main points.Do you want me to post that as well?

you clearly didn’t read the article but go ahead and tell me how you feel about mint press “agenda”

You don't have to get defensive. Some of the facts are from other places, but MP is a left wing site with a heavy "anti-interventionism at all costs" editorial slant. At the end of the article, they insinuate that Obama was responsible for Bolsonaro, ffs.

 

[keond]

The source is from Forbes and Biden site you dummy. If you don’t know anything about politics jus say it.... you don’t have to lie to kick it

You fukking ignoramus. You dont even know the difference between sources and articles being cited. Most of the citations come from Joe Bidens net worth. This is mostly a opinion based article by a looney far right wing website with citations.

Meet the Filthy Rich War Hawks That Make up the Joe Biden Foreign Policy Team

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

You fukking ignoramus. You dont even know the difference between sources and articles being cited. Most of the citations come from Joe Bidens net worth. This is mostly a opinion based article by a looney far right wing website with citations.

Meet the Filthy Rich War Hawks That Make up the Joe Biden Foreign Policy Team

I wouldn't call MP right wing, even though they sometimes cite stuff from paleocons like Buchanan and Ron Paul. They are anti-war above all.

 

[loyola llothta]

You fukking ignoramus. You dont even know the difference between sources and articles being cited. Most of the citations come from Joe Bidens net worth. This is mostly a opinion based article by a looney far right wing website with citations.

Meet the Filthy Rich War Hawks That Make up the Joe Biden Foreign Policy Team

Sit down you idiot

 

[HarlemHottie]

The source you posted is Mint Press, and they absolutely have an agenda.

And so does every other news outlet.

The better question is, where is the lie???

 

[Savvir]

The better question is, where is the lie???

the first lie is that they're even "filthy rich" in the first place

 

[loyola llothta]

You don't have to get defensive. Some of the facts are from other places, but MP is a left wing site with a heavy "anti-interventionism at all costs" editorial slant. At the end of the article, they insinuate that Obama was responsible for Bolsonaro, ffs.

you was the one pressing the issue passive aggressively... I just replied. If it’s no issue why bring it up?Also I haven’t seen any news site that doesn’t have they own agenda...I rather pick the real left wing anti-war ones

Yes Americans should take the US foreign policy serious at this time with the US steady declining (on the world stage) and the COVID-19 Pandemic going on.


Where is the lie?

Meanwhile, for Latin America, his foreign policy team intends to revive the so-called “anti-corruption drives” of the Obama era, which ultimately overthrew an elected government in Brazil and paved the way for the ascendency of far-right figure Jair Bolsonaro.

 

[HarlemHottie]

the first lie is that they're even "filthy rich" in the first place

That was editorializing but the figure is right there in black and white for you to decide for yourself. Are you unable to isolate and engage objective facts?

To your point, i could very easily make the argument that $134k for a speech IS, in fact, "filthy rich" for a politician considering the president makes $400k per yr.

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

you was the one pressing the issue passive aggressively... I just replied. If it’s no issue why bring it up?Also I haven’t seen any news site that doesn’t have they own agenda...I rather pick the real left wing anti-war ones

Yes Americans should take the US foreign policy serious at this time with the US steady declining (on the world stage) and the COVID-19 Pandemic going on.


Where is the lie?

From what I have read, and what my Brazilian friends have told me, Lula, Dilma, and their associates are to blame for Bolsonaro more than anything else. Say what you want about the good things Lula did, he pulled some strings to get them, and did it illegally. While he was going down for corruption, his party backed Dilma, his former associate for president that was herself mired in corruption and she got impeached. Her running mate then succeeded her, and was super unpopular. Along came a Trump like populist nationalist who promised change, and there we have it.

How did Obama "overthrow an elected government"?

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

And so does every other news outlet.

The better question is, where is the lie???

MP wears its agenda on its sleeve. That's all I was pointing out.
I didn't even say it was wrong, save the "Obama was responsible for Bolsonaro" part.

 

[HarlemHottie]

MP wears its agenda on its sleeve. That's all I was pointing out.
I didn't even say it was wrong, save the "Obama was responsible for Bolsonaro" part.

A good thing, imo.

Im gonna look into the bolsonaro claim, but looking at their work, i wouldn't be esp surprised if Obama's team had a hand.

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

A good thing, imo.

Im gonna look into the bolsonaro claim, but looking at their work, i wouldn't be esp surprised if Obama's team had a hand.

The Intercept says that the anti corruption folks had help from the US. That would be unsurprising. But even if they did, I'm not going to say that the US was responsible for Bolsonaro. The prosecution were b*stards, but Lula and his people were doing dirt as well.

 

[the bossman]

From what I have read, and what my Brazilian friends have told me, Lula, Dilma, and their associates are to blame for Bolsonaro more than anything else. Say what you want about the good things Lula did, he pulled some strings to get them, and did it illegally. While he was going down for corruption, his party backed Dilma, his former associate for president that was herself mired in corruption and she got impeached. Her running mate then succeeded her, and was super unpopular. Along came a Trump like populist nationalist who promised change, and there we have it.

How did Obama "overthrow an elected government"?

Blaming Lula & Dilma is laughable. Lulas policies helped an entire generation of disenfranchised afro-brasilians gain access to education and resources to help them come out of decades of poverty and into becoming middle class.

The white Brasilians elites did not like that at all. Difference here is US is a developed country with a solid democratic foundation. Brasil is a developing country with a shaky at best democracy

 

[Chronic]

The Intercept says that the anti corruption folks had help from the US. That would be unsurprising. But even if they did, I'm not going to say that the US was responsible for Bolsonaro. The prosecution were b*stards, but Lula and his people were doing dirt as well.