Deaf people are extremely rude. The Mexican was not putting up with that shyt 5 bucks an hour.
He was probably a killer in Mexico so he wasn’t gonna let a disabled bytch talk to him like that.

Deaf people are extremely rude. The Mexican was not putting up with that shyt 5 bucks an hour.
He was probably a killer in Mexico so he wasn’t gonna let a disabled bytch talk to him like that.

Okay..
After reading this..
I still have several questions..
It’s obvious you have an impairment..
So why the hell would you go to a drive thru speaker..
Was the restaurant closed..
If so..
Why didn’t the passenger just order for her at the speaker..
If you felt so discriminated against..
Why would you sit your ass in a drive thru for 2 hours..
How about getting the information off the window of the drive thru..
That usually has the district managers information..
And hit all social platforms..
Like other people do in this day and age...
Not trying to victim blame..
And it’s obvious brehito was in the wrong and didn’t use professionalism..
But common sense is missing out of this entire situation..
Both parties share culpability![]()
the passenger coulda just used his ears and nudged her to say "Number 8 please."She needed to SEE the persons' lips to COMMUNICATE



never will forget when i had a group of 'hispanics' clean my house and i walked by one of the bathrooms and seen one of these dudes kneeling in front of the toilet splashing the water on his face like the shyt was a sink. this is what they are teaching these mufukkas in mexico. scust brehs.

This would've never happened at chik fil a

never will forget when i had a group of 'hispanics' clean my house and i walked by one of the bathrooms and seen one of these dudes kneeling in front of the toilet splashing the water on his face like the shyt was a sink. this is what they are teaching these mufukkas in mexico. scust brehs.

Her son was not deathI'm sure that wasn't the first time she's ever gone through a drive-thru which means others were able to accommodate her and I assume without much fuss.
You're assuming the passenger isn't Deaf also.
change to discriminatory practices were never achieved by letting bygones be bygones.
dude refused to do his job which was to take orders, if he couldn't adapt and accommodate a deaf person who is unable to use the standard method than how is it reasonable that both parties are culpable?


