Minnesota man may get new trial after jurors admit they thought he must be guilty because he’s black

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,489
Reputation
6,942
Daps
91,286
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI


michael-smith-800x430.jpg


A Minneapolis man may get a new trial after two jurors came forward and admitted that racism was a major reason why they chose to convict him.

Local news station Fox 9 reports that two jurors are now saying that they were influenced by racist arguments made by another juror during deliberations when they decided to convict Michael Smith, who has been in jail for the past five years for illegally possession a firearm as a convicted felon.

Smith was accused by police of illegally possessing a firearm just months after he was released after serving a ten-year prison sentence for a third-degree murder charge. The police never produced any concrete evidence linking Smith to the firearm in question, so the trial came down to whose word jurors chose to believe.

The jury foreman said this week that a major reason they chose to believe the police was because of racism — and they said that one juror told his peers that Smith must be guilty because “he is a black person with a previous criminal record living in North Minneapolis… you know he’s just a banger from the hood.”

Smith has maintained his innocence the entire time and has insisted that his conviction was completely unfounded. According to Fox 9, the new revelations of racism on the part of jurors are “enough to get a new hearing early next year and a possible new trial.”

Minnesota man may get new trial after jurors admit they thought he must be guilty because he’s black
 

Yapdatfool

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
8,615
Reputation
1,266
Daps
22,695
Reppin
NULL
The prosecutor (and defense attorney probably) knew exactly what kind of jurors they needed to get a conviction. No wonder why half of all ex-cons go back to jail. He should be pardoned and have his record expunged immediately.

But but bu states rights...
 

Geek Nasty

Brain Knowledgeably Whizzy
Supporter
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
31,987
Reputation
5,700
Daps
121,335
Reppin
South Kakalaka
The prosecutor (and defense attorney probably) knew exactly what kind of jurors they needed to get a conviction. No wonder why half of all ex-cons go back to jail. He should be pardoned and have his record expunged immediately.

But but bu states rights...

White ones :ohhh:
 

wire28

Blade said what up
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
55,839
Reputation
12,977
Daps
205,341
Reppin
#ByrdGang #TheColi
The prosecutor (and defense attorney probably) knew exactly what kind of jurors they needed to get a conviction. No wonder why half of all ex-cons go back to jail. He should be pardoned and have his record expunged immediately.

But but bu states rights...
A jury of his peers? :troll:
 

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,495
Daps
37,713
Just outright convicted on a cops word with NO evidence... fukking cacs man... :stopitslime:
I try to serve on many juries as possible. I have a little algorithm that I use to help me through the case.

If the defendant is non-white: not guilty. If the defendant is white: guilty.

I don’t have any prejudices or biases that will hinder me making a fair decision.

I once had a police from the 35th district lie under oath. That’s my police district. Nothing happened to that officer.

That’s the justice system.
 

Nikki_04

All Star
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
1,731
Reputation
-690
Daps
8,484
Surprised they are even considering a retrial...isn't this the case with most cases where the defendant is black.

If he actually gets a new trial, hopefully it starts a trend.
 
Top