MLK’s famous criticism of Malcolm X was a ‘fraud,’ author finds

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
56,576
Reputation
21,919
Daps
308,418

MLK’s famous criticism of Malcolm X was a ‘fraud,’ author finds​


Jonathan Eig was deep in the Duke University archives researching his new biography of Martin Luther King Jr. when he made an alarming discovery: King’s harshest and most famous criticism of Malcolm X, in which he accused his fellow civil rights leader of “fiery, demagogic oratory,” appears to have been fabricated.

“I think its historic reverberations are huge,” Eig told The Washington Post. “We’ve been teaching people for decades, for generations, that King had this harsh criticism of Malcolm X, and it’s just not true.”

The quote came from a January 1965 Playboy interview with author Alex Haley, a then-43-year-old Black journalist, and was the longest published interview King ever did. Because of the severity of King’s criticism, it has been repeated countless times, cast as a dividing line between King and Malcolm X. The new revelation “shows that King was much more open-minded about Malcolm than we’ve tended to portray him,” Eig said.

Haley’s legacy has been tarnished by accusations of plagiarism and historical inaccuracy in his most famous book, “Roots,” but this latest finding could open up more of his work to criticism, especially “The Autobiography of Malcolm X: As Told to Alex Haley” — released nine months after Malcolm X’s assassination in 1965.



Archive link: https://archive.ph/bJikN



Wow. I'm not sure whether to chalk this up as another example of Haley lying, or whether the quotes were altered by someone else (government for instance). Either way it's a bombshell.
 

Canon

Veteran
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
23,371
Reputation
2,494
Daps
90,464
:ohhh:that's wild

I truly believe it was a gov't thing like some of the other rumors about them
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
56,576
Reputation
21,919
Daps
308,418
smells like COINTELPRO

Decades worth of high school children and college young adults were taught based on this premise. On the flip side it also fostered resentment against MLK from more militant people who viewed him as a push over compared to Malcolm. This feels like a perfect psyop. My only questionis how/why wasn't this disputed at the time. Or....maybe it was. It's not like we're talking about today, where a celebritity/public figure can respond to an inaccurate story the minute it's published on twitter. If King disputed it, it may be lost in time.
 

RedCloakBlackWraithe

.....
Supporter
Joined
Aug 30, 2015
Messages
19,843
Reputation
3,880
Daps
40,712
they were arming the movement quitely....salute to those brehs. may their spirits live on stronger in the hearts of the people. :blessed:
 
Top