Mr. Gun on dresser @stillbenefited, come in here for a sec

[Vandelay]

Surely you jest, sir...

 

[Mowgli]

We did this demonstation with clothes on over here.

We both know what we got

 

[LordDeathwatch]

And here this autistic water color “artist” running defense for suspect shyt again

And you nikkas better not act like y’all don’t be dapping that rapist piece of shyt
And keekeeing with that fake feminist, protector of black women
If y’all really cared about black women like that
That nikka would be ostracized everytime he posted
The real from the fake are very easy to tell on here

That part

MFs still go around dapping this bozo like it's all good. Ol' "Yeah he's a whole rapist but I agree with him on this" head ass nikkas can't even stand on principle on the internet, wouldn't trust them to take out my trash in real life.

 

[Still Benefited]

There's no context where this is not rape, homes...

There is a comma,the gun is seperate from the pressure. Peer pressuring a woman into sex wasnt a crime back in the day. Althought i think it is now.

The gun is seperate and not invovled,hence the comma. Its there because I carry a gun and took out for comfort.


But 10 years later,a woman could say you were pressuring her AND you had a gun on the dresser. Combining the two together to paint a sinister story.

 

[The Intergalactic Koala]

Bruhs be having the same humor as white people these days.

It's not even funny CAC ha ha shock humor, it's more mean spirited, frat boy, goofy CAC nonsense. I love a good shock joke, but

 

[Vic Damone. Jr]

What the fukk is happening in here

 

[ChatGPT-5]

I've fukked drunk women.
I've pressured women into fukking,with my gun on the nightstand.
I've had women say no,and continued the foreplay,they reciprocated but could still tell a court they said "no". And there really is no "Bu bu but...." to counter that because no supposedly means no,and has always meant no,and will always mean no"

ChatGPT-4:

The statement you've shared is concerning and indicates behaviors that are deeply troubling and potentially criminal. The actions described – having sexual encounters with intoxicated individuals and pressuring women into sex, particularly with the presence of a gun – raise serious ethical and legal issues.

1. Sex with Intoxicated Individuals: Engaging in sexual activity with someone who is drunk can be legally and morally problematic. In many jurisdictions, a person who is intoxicated cannot give valid consent. This means that having sex with someone who is drunk could be considered sexual assault or rape.
2. Pressuring Someone into Sex: Coercing someone into sexual activity is a form of sexual assault. Consent must be given freely and willingly for any sexual activity to be considered lawful and ethical.
3. Presence of a Gun: The mention of a gun adds an element of intimidation and threat to the situation. Using the presence of a weapon to coerce someone into sex is a serious crime and a form of aggravated sexual assault in many places.

It's important to understand that these actions are not only morally reprehensible but also likely to be criminal offenses. If this statement is a confession or a depiction of real events, it's crucial to report it to the appropriate authorities for investigation. If it's a fictional or hypothetical statement, it's still promoting dangerous and illegal behavior that should be condemned.

 

[DrexlersFade]

Your father pulling his dikk out for you is WILD

Wtf

 

[Paper Boi]

Yall are just slow or havent lived life.


If a woman you fukked plenty of times,calls you drunk from the club saying shes pulling up becauase she wants dikk. How is that "not right?" Unless she decided ten years later to take the situation out of context and tell the world she was drunk,and i took advantage. Even though in real time we fukked countless times afterwards.


If i put my gun on the dresser because it was in my waistband,and thats just where normal people put it. How is that wrong? Unless 10 years later she wanted to tell people i brandished a gun and she was scared. Like that actress tried with Steven Segal. Even though we fukked countless times afterwards,it still could be made to sound sinister when it wasnt. 10 years after the fact.


If your having foreplay and a woman says "no we shouldnt do this(on period,has boyfriend etc)". But you continue the foreplay,and she reciprocates. If yall procceed to fukk with no issues afterwards. How is that wrong? Unless 10 years later she wanted to tell the world "I said no"



In all of these scenarios the women arent lying but they arent telling the truth and are purposely leaving out context,to paint a sinister narrative. This is what can happen to men who actually have a name or wealth. It could happen to anybody really just less likely..And there really isnt a defense for something that happened a decade ago. This has been a beautiful experiment as the bitter bytches on here have done exactly what a scorned woman would do.



Take me out of context,a twist the truth in orde4lr to villianize me. Message to the youth#WeCanAllBeCosby

how do you have all these hypothetical rape scenarios that you’ve committed in your mental rolodex

 

[Black Panther]

Real talk, there’s some untapped talent on this site. Some of these dudes are FUNNY

There are times on this site where I have legit laughed so hard I was crying. And it's usually so highly contextual that I can't explain the joke.

 

[ChatGPT-5]

There is a comma,the gun is seperate from the pressure. Peer pressuring a woman into sex wasnt a crime back in the day. Althought i think it is now.

The gun is seperate and not invovled,hence the comma. Its there because I carry a gun and took out for comfort.


But 10 years later,a woman could say you were pressuring her AND you had a gun on the dresser. Combining the two together to paint a sinister story.

The additional context provided does clarify the statement somewhat, but it still raises significant ethical and legal concerns:

1. Presence of a Gun for Comfort: Separating the gun from the act of pressuring someone into sex might mitigate the legal implications, but the presence of a firearm in such a context can still be seen as intimidating, regardless of the intent. Even if the gun is not used to coerce, its mere presence can create an environment of fear or intimidation, which can impact a person's ability to freely give consent.
2. Overall Implications: It's important to understand that consent is a key element in any sexual activity. Consent must be clear, enthusiastic, and ongoing. Any form of pressure, coercion, or intimidation that compromises the ability to give or withhold consent is ethically and legally problematic.

 

[staticshock]

I'm not implying anything...but how you know by having a gun on a dresser was him intimidating a woman to have sex?

Like if I wore a ski mask during sex would that be me trying to be rapey or is that me becoming my alter ego: Rufus Ruffcutt ?

Is this what got him bushed, or him agreeing with the lady who let her child wax adults?

 

[King_Kamala61]

Is this what got him bushed, or him agreeing with the lady who let her child wax adults?

I was bushed for something totally else...and I gotta be on my best behavior. I can't geaux into details cause they watchin

 

[King_Kamala61]

@Thick_Necc_Jenkins You're gonna fukk around and find yourself doing another bid on Cell Block B at The Coli State Penitentiary if you don't chill, breh.

1st day out...I done gave up the debauchery...I'm saved

 

[King_Kamala61]

And here this autistic water color “artist” running defense for suspect shyt again

And you nikkas better not act like y’all don’t be dapping that rapist piece of shyt
And keekeeing with that fake feminist, protector of black women
If y’all really cared about black women like that
That nikka would be ostracized everytime he posted
The real from the fake are very easy to tell on here

Aight...see this the shyt I'm talking bout...jealous ass Negroes. Just so hateful and jealous it's in they eyes and seeping out they pores