Nas didn’t succeed over Jay in business in any capacity. And standing 10 toes down on it sounds corny as a talking point - I truly hope you don’t do this in real life. You @L. Deezy co-sign each other’s weirdness about this ish. I don’t get it. You’re a Nas stan and it clouds your otherwise rational brain.
New York City is allowing three licenses for casino projects in New York. 6 or 7 different companies put up bids. A Brooklyn group (which Jay Z could’ve been a part of and chose not to), a Queens group (which Nad chose to be a part of), a Bronx group (which originally denied but was overridden by the mayor and is still competing) and three different Manhattan based groups. Jay Z chose to go with the most ambitious and potentially profitable but ultimately most difficult one to get approved - the Times Square project. It was rejected 4-2. Know what else? EVERY SINGLE OTHER MANHATTAN BID GOT REJECTED BY THE SAME MARGIN. So there will be no casino in Manhattan whatsoever.
It wasn’t a rejection of Jay Z - it was a rejection of the very idea of a casino in Manhattan. Theater groups protested arguing it would add congestion and takeaway attention from Broadway. Basically, the city sided with established groups that didn’t want a casino in the area - ANYWHERE. The Queens bid and other bids are in much less densely populated areas and did not have the same pushback or landscaping changing effect. In other words, Jay Z went for a home run when he could’ve hit a single. The Queens bid was never competing directly with Manhattan and had completely different arguments. A Nas “victory” over Jay would be if he was attached to one of the other Manhattan bid but they all got rejected. Salute to Nas on a successful business venture but leave all that other corny shyt at the door.
Nas was a background figure via his investing group - damn near a silent partner. He is being mentioned solely because Jay Z was the actual face along with Caesars of the other project.
Whoopty Doo...
.