Native Americans have Middle Eastern Oigins? :dahell:

Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis

googling gay porn :ahh:
Joined
Oct 28, 2013
Messages
325
Reputation
-245
Daps
11,006
Reppin
gaygangbangs.com
Now im waiting for more valid sources because this shyt sounds a lil iffy. Haplotype T is not common among most natives Amerindians but prevelant in Cherokee natives. shyt sounds mad sketchy.

Native Americans are conventionally held to fit into a handful of haplogroups. The term haplogroup refers to a genetic population group stemming from a common ancestor. Haplogroup T is not among the haplogroups most geneticists recognize as Native American. Yates, however, said that it is prevalent among the Cherokee and has been for a very long time.

He wrote in his report, released earlier this month: “T is the leading haplogroup (23.1 percent), with a frequency on a par with modern-day Egyptians (23.4 percent) and Arabs (24.4 percent). T is thus a defining mark of Cherokee ancestry. … We can safely rule out recent European admixture. As we have discussed again and again, there was no available source for a huge, sudden influx of female-mediated Middle Eastern DNA on the American frontier. Even Sephardic Jews (11 to 14 percent), many of whom were also Indian traders, could hardly have accounted for such admixture.

“Moreover, had it occurred in the colonial period or more recently, the diversity, age, and unique characteristics of the T haplotypes would not have yielded the patterns noticed in this paper. Most T’s would have matched people in the Old World and we would simply be looking at an effect of migration. Instead, we have a North American branch of T with peculiar SNPs [Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, a DNA sequence variation] which is evidently a cross-section of a very old population originating in the Old World.”

In a different part of the report, he explained one way to tell if the genetic characteristics are ancient in origin, or if they could be attributed to recent admixture: “Generally, the more mutations, the more ancient the type.”

While the level of the T-haplotype found across Yates’s 67 Cherokee test subjects is comparable to those found in Iraqi and Iranian Jews (about 24 percent), it is far higher than that found in nearby regions where one would expect admixture. In neighboring countries in the Middle East, as well as among Jews from other regions, the frequency of T is only 4–14 percent.
http://dnaconsultants.com/
announcements/phase-ii-of-cherokee-study-concludes



@KidStranglehold what's your take on this shyt?
 

Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis

googling gay porn :ahh:
Joined
Oct 28, 2013
Messages
325
Reputation
-245
Daps
11,006
Reppin
gaygangbangs.com
If this study is saying is true (which seems sketchy), it only means Natives(Cherokee) and Middle Easterners probably share a common ancestor. Or it can mean Cherokee are highly admixed and absorbed some admixture from non-natives. Which to me looks like what happened.

It states on the article that the admixture is not recent, so that's the part I'm like..:patrice:
 
Top