NBA Draft Lottery could be changed for the 17-18 season

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
87,858
Reputation
10,222
Daps
218,552
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
I like it. I think it's more exciting when a team that just misses the playoffs gets the first pick rather then a lousy team

It was great imo when the MAgic won it the year after they got Shaq and you knew they were gonna be a team on the rise
They'd still have to win the lotto for that though.

By your logic the Magic woulda never got Shaq because by then you woulda got tired of seeing them in the lottery.

If a lousy team can't have that kind of talent infusion they'll be forever lousy
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,263
Daps
89,578
Two easy solutions
1) Top picks are given based on best record not in the playoffs, if you are a bad team you are more likely to finish at the bottom of the draft, you aren't rewarded for poor performance.
2) Removal of draft altogether, teams pick player who they want to draft and have 5 min auction for player services in the first 2 rounds and 2 minute auction periods per pick afterwards. (NBAPA should be behind this)
 

dh86

Superstar
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
25,365
Reputation
1,106
Daps
57,133
Reppin
Detroit
They'd still have to win the lotto for that though.

By your logic the Magic woulda never got Shaq because by then you woulda got tired of seeing them in the lottery.

If a lousy team can't have that kind of talent infusion they'll be forever lousy

We've had Mark Cuban admit Dallas tried to lose on purpose the last month of the season. The Suns sat 3 of their 4 best players the last month of the season. If a team tanked to get the worst record, only to end up with the 8th pick, that'd be a great thing for the NBA. The league is better off with all 30 teams making basketball moves to win.
 

nieman

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
18,084
Reputation
2,746
Daps
36,024
Reppin
Philly
My proposal was always to change the weighting scale. Do it in reverse, so the teams that just miss the playoffs have a greater shot at a high pick. Like the 6-8 best record, outside of the playoffs, are the ones in high contention of the Top 5 pick...worst record with the lowest shot.

4 teams with best rec outside of playoffs - 20% each at #1-8
4 next teams that missed playoffs - 2.5% each #1-8
4 next worst recs - 2% at #1 #1-8
2 worst records - 1% at #1 #1-8

So lottery would be Top 8, and then record best to worst outside of playoffs, worst to best playoff teams. Encourage competitiveness since everyone is competing for a spot, and reward treadmill teams, hopefully get them over hump. And just enough randomness.
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
87,858
Reputation
10,222
Daps
218,552
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
We've had Mark Cuban admit Dallas tried to lose on purpose the last month of the season. The Suns sat 3 of their 4 best players the last month of the season. If a team tanked to get the worst record, only to end up with the 8th pick, that'd be a great thing for the NBA. The league is better off with all 30 teams making basketball moves to win.
Cuban was never a proponent of tanking until his team got crappy. The 2 NY teams are where they are because instead of taking a long term pragmatic approach to rebuilding they felt their fans wouldn't stand for that kind of wait. The big loser in this could be a team that's bad because they didn't have a choice.

The league is in denial of 3 things:

1. Tanking pays.

2. Nobody really does it and you can be awful without intentionally doing so

3. Nobody really believes in any talent outside of the top 10, because teams will do anything to not have a build a team using picks outside of that area
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
87,858
Reputation
10,222
Daps
218,552
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
My proposal was always to change the weighting scale. Do it in reverse, so the teams that just miss the playoffs have a greater shot at a high pick. Like the 6-8 best record, outside of the playoffs, are the ones in high contention of the Top 5 pick...worst record with the lowest shot.

4 teams with best rec outside of playoffs - 20% each at #1-8
4 next teams that missed playoffs - 2.5% each #1-8
4 next worst recs - 2% at #1 #1-8
2 worst records - 1% at #1 #1-8

So lottery would be Top 8, and then record best to worst outside of playoffs, worst to best playoff teams. Encourage competitiveness since everyone is competing for a spot, and reward treadmill teams, hopefully get them over hump. And just enough randomness.
So if you're the worst team how can you sell anyone in your fanbase hope for the future, because the 14th pick every year isn't gonna do it?
 

Bilz

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,159
Reputation
1,355
Daps
37,338
Reppin
Los Angeles
I wouldn't call the Nuggets, Pistons, Hornets or Heat bad teams. It would be mightily discouraging for anyone to try the Sixers process ever again if that outcome is impossible.
Whether they are bad or not isn't the point. These new ideas don't eliminate the tanking incentive, they just pass it around.
 
Top