Nearly half of Obamacare exchanges are struggling over their future

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
27,797
Reputation
2,728
Daps
67,120
Reppin
NYC
http://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...42717d8afa_story.html?tid=HP_more?tid=HP_more

Nearly half of the 17 insurance marketplaces set up by the states and the District under President Obama’s health law are struggling financially, presenting state officials with an unexpected and serious challenge five years after the passage of the landmark Affordable Care Act.

Many of the online exchanges are wrestling with surging costs, especially for balky technology and expensive customer-call centers — and tepid enrollment numbers. To ease the fiscal distress, officials are considering raising fees on insurers, sharing costs with other states and pressing state lawmakers for cash infusions. Some are weighing turning over part or all of their troubled marketplaces to the federal exchange, HealthCare.gov, which is now working smoothly.

The latest challenges come at a critical time. With two enrollment periods completed, the law has sharply reduced the number of uninsured and is starting to force change in the nation’s sprawling health-care system. But the law remains highly controversial and faces another threat: The Supreme Court will decide by the end of June whether consumers in the 34 states using the federal exchange will be barred from receiving subsidies to buy insurance.

If the court strikes down subsidies in the federal exchange, the states that are struggling financially might be less likely to turn over all operations to the federal marketplace because they want to make sure their residents don’t lose subsidies to help them buy insurance. If the court upholds subsidies for the federal exchange, some states may step up efforts to transfer operations to HealthCare.gov.

State health insurance marketplaces View Graphic
[Millions at risk of losing coverage as Supreme Court weighs Obamacare]

“Everyone is looking at all the options,” said Jim Wadleigh, executive director of Connecticut’s exchange, considered one of the most successful of the state marketplaces. While states are “trying to find ways to become self-sustaining,” he added, it is an open question whether they will succeed.
 

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
27,797
Reputation
2,728
Daps
67,120
Reppin
NYC
States have received nearly $5 billion in federal grants to establish the online marketplaces used by consumers to enroll in health plans under the ACA. The federal funding ended at the beginning of the year, and exchanges now are required to cover their operating costs.

Most exchanges are independent or quasi-independent entities. For most of them, the main source of income is fees imposed on insurers, which typically are passed on to consumers. Because those fees are based on how many people have signed up, strong enrollment is critical to an exchange’s fiscal success.

But for the recently completed open enrollment period, signups for the state marketplaces rose a disappointing 12 percent, to 2.8 million people. That compared with a 61 percent increase for the federal exchange, to 8.8 million people, according to Avalere Health, a consulting firm. States with the smallest enrollment growth are among those facing the most daunting financial problems.

Most exchanges have operating budgets of $28 million to $32 million. One of the biggest cost drivers is call centers, where operators answer questions and can sign people up. Enrollment can be a lengthy process — and in several states, contractors are paid by the minute. An even bigger cost involves IT work to correct defective software that might, for example, make mistakes in calculating subsidies.

These 4 states ditched their faulty enrollment Web sites]

In Rhode Island, the legislature is considering a fee on health plans that would go up or down based on the exchange’s operating costs.

In Hawaii, which has one of the most problem-plagued marketplaces, the exchange needs $28 million to fund operations until 2022, when it is projected to become self-sustaining, officials say. Without the money, “it’s going to be very difficult to keep the doors open,” said Jeff Kissel, executive director of Hawaii Health Connector.
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
56,785
Reputation
22,102
Daps
309,523
That's the only part that matters

The US has a lot of catching up to do

yea but if it's not sustainable to run.

A lot of states played with that fed money, doled out contracts to buddies, and are now facing high costs. Oregon really fukked up for instance, paying for a site that didn't work. I think it'll work in the long run but states are going to have to treat this realistically.
 

Brosef

I respect O.G. knowledge
Supporter
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
7,457
Reputation
2,760
Daps
36,823
Reppin
T-Dot
yea but if it's not sustainable to run.

A lot of states played with that fed money, doled out contracts to buddies, and are now facing high costs. Oregon really fukked up for instance, paying for a site that didn't work. I think it'll work in the long run but states are going to have to treat this realistically.

Corruption will of course ruin things

There will be growing pains
 
Top