New Jersey man, 21, dies after car started remotely by owner rolls forward, crushing him

Sonic Boom of the South

Louisiana, Army 2 War Vet, Jackson State Univ Alum
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
84,414
Reputation
25,336
Daps
306,090
Reppin
Rosenbreg's, Rosenberg's...1825, Tulane
New Jersey man, 21, dies after car started remotely by owner rolls forward, crushing him
35925253_10156401755146530_5216436582143229952_n.jpg

Fox News Flash top headlines for Dec. 12

Fox News Flash top headlines for Dec. 12 are here. Check out what's clicking on Foxnews.com

A New Jersey man was killed last weekend after he was pinned between two cars — one of which was started remotely by its owner, officials said.

Michael Kosanovich, 21, was in the Queens borough of New York City on Friday when he died around 10 p.m. He was standing between two parked 2002 Lexus IS300s when one of them turned on, after it was "accidentally started" by a remote control system.

A Message from Wells Fargo

The turned-on car somehow rolled forward, trapping Kosanovich between the two vehicles, local news outlet the Gothamist reported. Bystanders attempted to move the car backward, but "in the course of doing so, the vehicle rolled forward once again and pinned the pedestrian between the two vehicles once more," police said.

Michael-Kosanovich-FB.jpg

Michael Kosanovich, 21, was crushed between two cars in the Queens borough of New York City on Friday night, officials said. (Facebook)

Kosanovich was rushed to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead on Saturday.

His obituary describes the 21-year-old as a high school graduate who loved to skateboard and ride ATVs and dirt bikes. Kosanovich was an employee of Barclay Environmental in Edison, N.J.

No arrests have been made in Kosanovich's death, according to Streetsblog, which reported that he was looking at one of the cars to determine if he should buy it.

It's unclear how the Lexus rolled forward, as the remote system isn't supposed to work unless the vehicle is placed in park. A spokesperson for Lexus told Streetsblog that the remote start feature was not offered in their vehicles in 2002, and therefore someone added it to the vehicle after it was purchased.
 

Doobie Doo

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
64,172
Reputation
25,570
Daps
411,868
Reppin
Raleigh, NC
A Message from Wells Fargo

The turned-on car somehow rolled forward, trapping Kosanovich between the two vehicles, local news outlet the Gothamist reported. Bystanders attempted to move the car backward, but "in the course of doing so, the vehicle rolled

Sounds like a LAWSUIT for the car manufacturer. I assume there was a malfunction where the transmission may have shifted in gear from the car engine starting. I start my car remotely all the time, it should not be moving when it's remotely started
 

Eddie_1100

All Star
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
3,321
Reputation
790
Daps
10,788
Sounds like a LAWSUIT for the car manufacturer. I assume there was a malfunction where the transmission may have shifted in gear from the car engine starting. I start my car remotely all the time, it should not be moving when it's remotely started
Did the remote start option come with that car from factory?:patrice: So many questions..
:jbhmm:
 

Steel

Superstar
Joined
Oct 19, 2017
Messages
3,498
Reputation
305
Daps
15,978
Reppin
NYC - ATL-MIA
Sounds like a LAWSUIT for the car manufacturer. I assume there was a malfunction where the transmission may have shifted in gear from the car engine starting. I start my car remotely all the time, it should not be moving when it's remotely started

The car was a 2002 model. The remote start was an aftermarket addition. That malfunction is 100% on the owner who added the remote start.
 
Top