New law forces Sperm Donors to pay child support

[Kings County]

Sperm donor ordered to pay child support to lesbian couple despite him giving up rights to the child | Mail Online

 

[Rockstar Mom]

Ladies!

A new hustle is upon us

 

[Mr. Somebody]

You pay when you give your sperm to demons, friends.

Did he donate via sperm bank or donate manually? O he answered a demonic ad in the newspaper. Sounds like he made a deal with the devil if you ask me friends. What are you gonna do?

 

[Rockstar Mom]

And for the nikkas who won't/can't read.

"Ms Bauer and Ms Schreiner, who separated in 2010, plan to help Mr Marotta fight the state's decision, saying they are 'forever grateful' for the child he gave their family. Ms Bauer, from Topeka, told cjonline.com this week: 'We’re kind of at a loss. We are going to support him in whatever action he wants to go forward with.'"

The women are AGAINST the states ruling.

 

[Binary]

 

[Jesus]

You pay when you give your sperm to demons, friends.

Did he donate via sperm bank or donate manually? O he answered a demonic ad in the newspaper. Sounds like he made a deal with the devil if you ask me friends. What are you gonna do?

:wow2:

 

[Stoop Kid]

 

[concise]

there is no new law

Less confusing article:

Kansas Wants Sperm Donor to Pay Child Support - ABC News

Marotta donated and Schreiner gave birth to a little girl through artificial insemination, according to court documents. The issue that would later become a legal factor, however, is that the artificial insemination was not performed by a licensed physician, which Swinnen said Marotta did not know at the time.

"He sporadically heard that the child was born, but that was about it," Swinnen said. "He had no contact with the child."

"Three years forward, the couple sought state assistance for the child and the Kansas Department of Children and Families sought out of them the name of the father and said they would not provide assistance unless they provide the name," Swinnen said.

The women gave the state Marotta's name and on Oct. 3, attorney Mark McMillan filed a petition on behalf of the Department of Children and Families that claimed that Marotta was the baby's father and needed to support her.

The filing said that the state had spent $189 on the baby from July 2012 to September 2012 and nearly $6,000 in medical assistance, which Marotta had a duty to pay.

Swinnen said Marotta was "absolutely floored" by the petition, especially after signing the agreement.

Marotta's attorneys claimed that as the sperm donor, he had no responsibility to pay. But the state shot back saying that the agreement signed was invalid because the artificial insemination was not performed by a licensed physician, according to legal documents.

You pay when you give your sperm to demons, friends.

What more can be said?

 

[Takerstani]

They're going to make it harder for couples (gay and straight) to find a donor in the future. The attorney was doing too much. While I can't blame them for trying to find a source to provide for the kids, they did take in 8 kids that the system likely would've been supporting and they seem to have legitimately fallen on hard times (illness).

Ms Bauer and Ms Schreiner had been together for eight years and adopted eight children. They ended their relationship in 2010 but continue to co-parent their sons and daughters who range from three months to 25 years old.

 

[Mr. Somebody]

there is no new law

Less confusing article:

Kansas Wants Sperm Donor to Pay Child Support - ABC News




What more can be said?

This man saw an opportunity for a cheap thrill not realizing how much it would cost him in the end. This is why as men, you dont make deals with the devil. The money you save, may be your own, friend.

 

[Metta World Movement]

The legal agreement that the three made in 2009 was deemed invalid by Kansas state because they did not use a certified doctor for the insemination.

Ms Bauer and Ms Schreiner, who separated in 2010, plan to help Mr Marotta fight the state's decision, saying they are 'forever grateful' for the child he gave their family.

Ms Bauer, from Topeka, told cjonline.com this week: 'We’re kind of at a loss. We are going to support him in whatever action he wants to go forward with.'

Hannah Schroller, Mr Marotta's attorney, argued that the case was consistent with a 2007 case in which the Kansas Supreme Court denied parental rights to a man who sought them after providing a sperm donation under similar circumstances.

A licensed physician performed the insemination in the 2007 case.

Schroller wrote that Marotta took the same actions as the man in the 2007 case did, and he - like that man - should be considered a sperm donor, not a father.

She stressed that sperm banks regularly ship donations for the intended purpose of artificial insemination within the United States and abroad to both residential and medical facility addresses.

Schroller argued in court documents that if a donor is free of parental responsibility only when a doctor performs an insemination, 'then any woman in Kansas could have sperm donations shipped to her house, inseminate herself without a licensed physician and seek out the donor for financial support because her actions made him a father, not a sperm donor.

 

[eastside313]

If you on welfare they going after the pops period. They don't respect no Craigslist sperm donor shyt

 

[Fillerguy]

OP is an idiot

 

[Kings County]

Ladies!

A new hustle is upon us

 

[shylittlekitten]

wtf this is the most redonk shyt.... this makes it less likely dudes with donate sperm.