Nightcrawler wasnt born through the graces of harlem
- Thread starter CouldntBeMeTho
- Start date
Nkrumah Was Right
Superstar
Comic book writers are perverts
Solomon Lurke
My Boys Dey Be Lurkin...
Originally it was said to be Mystique and AzazelWas it always the case or this some new weirdo pandering bs?
Formerly Black Trash
Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Mystique and Destiny having Nightcrawler as their child was Claremont’s original intent
Editors were like
Formerly Black Trash
Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
I wanted to make it but I was like nah too easyI knew this thread was coming. Apparently this was always Claremont idea, but the they way they retconned this shyt after 40 years was retarded.
Solomon Lurke
My Boys Dey Be Lurkin...
It makes no sense though. Azazel is the reason he has the demon like look and the tail. How do they explain that now.
Hell naw. This some gen z pandering.Was it always the case or this some new weirdo pandering bs?
Fillerguy
Veteran
A pointless recon. The could haven't invented a new sibling for breh. Mystique is a hoe so its believable.
Last edited:
General Mills
More often than not I tend to take that L.
This is correct. How is he part demon now? This makes no sense
Zoomer propaganda
Formerly Black Trash
Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Because he's a mutant was the original reason,Azazel came later
But the new explanation is Mystique stole DNA with his powers
Also Austin's run was trash but still better than Bendis
Seems pretty demonic to me
