No 10 considers 50-year mortgages that could pass down generations

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
69,462
Reputation
10,652
Daps
187,747

Cautious welcome for idea to tackle housing crisis but experts warn of risks to those inheriting
For sale and sold signs

In England, people in full-time work need to spend an average of 9.1 times their annual earnings to buy a home. Photograph: Andrew Matthews/PA

Peter Walker and Robert Booth
Fri 1 Jul 2022 17.30 EDT


Downing Street is exploring the idea of trying to tackle the housing crisis with ultra-long mortgages of up to 50 years that could pass between generations, allowing more people to build up equity rather than pay rent.

Mortgage experts said the idea could bring some benefits but flagged problems, including the potential to saddle children with debt, and the fact it would not tackle the fundamental issue of housing supply.

Under the plan being examined by No 10, a longer mortgage period would allow people to borrow larger sums, with the possibility of passing the debt on, although it remains unclear what government action would make this happen.

Other housing ideas being considered by Downing Street include trying to free up government-owned land for rapid homebuilding, and exploring whether institutions such as schools could build homes for key workers priced out of local areas.

Boris Johnson, speaking to reporters during his trip to the Nato summit in Madrid this week, confirmed that the idea of 50-year mortgages was being looked at, saying the government “wants to find all sorts of creative ways to help people into ownership”.

He said: “Last year we had 400,000 first-time buyers. That’s a great number, we’re starting to turn the tide, but it is crucial for this government and for our overall economic story if those numbers continue to be strong.

“We need young people to have the confidence, to have the deposits, the mortgage packages to be able to get into ownership. If you’re good enough to pay a lot in rent, we should find ways to help you to convert that into a mortgage.”

Asked if he was considering ultra-long mortgages, he replied: “Yes, certainly.”

The idea of multi-decade mortgages being transferred between generations is not new and has been pioneered in Japan, where 100-year family mortgages have been offered for some time.

In the UK, relatively long mortgages are already the most common. According to the Building Societies Association, 37% of first-time buyers took out mortgages of between 30 and 35 years, with only 10% opting for less than 20 years.

The key challenge is the decades-long acceleration of home prices beyond growth in pay. In England, people in full-time work now need to spend an average of 9.1 times their annual earnings to buy a home.

Longer-term mortgages would mean people could borrow greater sums with the same monthly mortgage repayment, potentially opening up many more homes to those currently unable to buy, who might end up spending less money on repayments than they do currently on rent.

What these mortgages would not do, however, is solve the long-term shortfall in housebuilding.

Graham Taylor, the managing director of the mortgage firm Hudson Rose, said the idea had complexities. “On the face of it, it seems like a great idea,” he said. “But the problem remains that the loan would need to be affordable for all the original applicants and also the children who inherit it. Otherwise, the children could risk inheriting a liability they are unable to manage, which, when secured against your home, has catastrophic consequences.”

Other potential complications include that when a property is passed on to children, inheritance tax could be liable, and the prospect of people having to maintain payments into retirement.

Rob Gill, the managing director of Altura Mortgage Finance, said that if the plan did open up the market to more first-time buyers, this would have the effect of keeping property prices artificially high. “It seems governments the world over will do anything to avoid the alternative of property prices actually falling,” he said.
 

sportscribe

Superstar
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
7,545
Reputation
1,836
Daps
33,072
They would be super expensive to obtain and probably even more pricier than you'd expect as they'd likely have to be backed by insurance companies.

Will probably only end up being accessible to a select few people who can actually afford it

Imagine paying for an under water mortgage for decades if the housing market were ever to crash.
 

O³ (O cubed)

No more PAWGs, PLEASE??!!!??
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Messages
20,210
Reputation
6,576
Daps
74,569
Reppin
Hackney, London
so theoretically it would possible for a single child of divorced parents to inherent two mortgages. :huhldup:

The law is that whoever gets the house gets the mortgage either that or one party will have to buy out the other person's share of the house. If the house is sold they have to split the equity.
 

Carl Tethers

@NotAnFBIagent a pedo
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
11,036
Reputation
9,840
Daps
47,544
They would be super expensive to obtain and probably even more pricier than you'd expect as they'd likely have to be backed by insurance companies.

Will probably only end up being accessible to a select few people who can actually afford it

Imagine paying for an under water mortgage for decades if the housing market were ever to crash.

Ending up with negative equity on a 50 year mortgage :damn::russ:
 

jj23

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
26,775
Reputation
6,298
Daps
119,875
Jeez.

So instead of stopping foreigners buying up all our land and build £400k 1 bedroom flats, Boris instead wants to lumber our debt onto our kids.

What a prat.
Chinese and Russian outchea wildin' .
Boris' solution is to pass on debt to generations.

Sleight of hand is glorious.
 

EA

A Pound & A Prayer
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
11,324
Reputation
2,895
Daps
42,647
Reppin
London, UK
We’re fukked here in the UK. Somehow, this government‘s solution to tackling inflation and the CoL crisis is to encourage more borrowing by people that are getting progressively more cash poor. People with mortgages they can’t really afford is one of the main factors that caused the crash in ‘08 and it feels like these dikkheads are determined to expedite another crash.

The property value here in London is already unsustainably inflated due to unregulated foreign investment in properties that don’t even get occupied. You literally can live in a house worth £500k and have 2-3 food banks within a 20 minute drive from you :snoop:
 

gho3st

plata or plomo
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
36,081
Reputation
3,310
Daps
88,100
Reppin
2016
Why dont Britons buy house in rural area instead? Are they expensive there as well?


Lowkey big dogs wanted to sanction russia but they people suffering for it lol
 
Top