nWo 2000 vs. nWo WWE: Which was worse?

?

  • 2000

    Votes: 37 71.2%
  • WWE

    Votes: 15 28.8%

  • Total voters
    52

Fenian

Superstar
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
9,364
Reputation
3,190
Daps
32,863
Reppin
Govan
Frh6B4m.gif


:flabbynsick:
 

Hostile

All Star
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
3,494
Reputation
985
Daps
6,690
nWo Poison. They seemed like your typical WWF stable and were :flabbynsick:. Hall didn't stick around long. Waltman was as annoying as ever. HBK did nothing. Big Show didn't fit in. Austin using politics to go over Hall at WM18 resulting in nWo looking weak as they all were getting mudholes stomped in them by that has-been.

They were supposed to be this dangerous group but Lesnar (who wasn't even there for two months) looked like he could hold his own with them when they had that confrontation.
Brock even made one of their biggest rivals think twice
oNJZPDV.gif
 

CM_Burns

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
23,135
Reputation
40
Daps
35,588
Reppin
NULL
NWO WWE, from arrival to Wrestlemania 18, was a good angle. Yea, NWO wasn't booked quite like NWO WCW, but the story they told with Rock/Austin and leading to Hogan's face turn (which worked perfectly) was pretty good. After that it got really bad, but they had at least a solid month or so of decent NWO use.

NWO 2000 had Bret and Jeff Jarrett in front, two of the least NWO-ish guys ever.
 

The Intergalactic Koala

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2017
Messages
67,579
Reputation
27,352
Daps
276,969
Reppin
Extinct
NWO WWE was trash due to the fact that the storyline revolved around Rock/Hogan. The poison wasn't injected at all:beli:, it was just meh when Hall got shytted on, Nash was just there, and Hogan was Hogan. Lets not forget HBKKK's involvement into the KKKliq:mjpls:.
 
Top