NY Times Admits "17 Intelligence Agencies” Russia Story Untrue

[Prince.Skeletor]

So basically here is an article fully bashing Trump, but scroll down all the way at the bottom LMAOOO

Trump’s Deflections and Denials on Russia Frustrate Even His Allies
Correction: June 29, 2017

A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.

But as you can see here, the correction is also wrong.
It's not 4 agencies, its' 3. See here director of the NSA explain it's just 3 agencies.


This is not a debunk Russia thread, just letting ya'll know it's not 27 or even 4. It's 3.
That's all, that's the only purpose of this thread.

Anyhow, with that said Trump is still a racist and a complete idiot
but just so ya'll know

the worst thing about this country is partisanship and because of this thread that partisan idiot adevilyoumayknow will be negging me shortly HAHAHHAHA...
What a fukkin idiot!



Fukk Trump... but ya

 

[Tony D'Amato]

This has already been discussed. The Intel agencies that matter on this topic, were in agreement

 

[AndroidHero]

So basically here is an article fully bashing Trump, but scroll down all the way at the bottom LMAOOO

Trump’s Deflections and Denials on Russia Frustrate Even His Allies
Correction: June 29, 2017

A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.

But as you can see here, the correction is also wrong.
It's not 4 agencies, its' 3. See here director of the NSA explain it's just 3 agencies.


This is not a debunk Russia thread, just letting ya'll know it's not 27 or even 4. It's 3.
That's all, that's the only purpose of this thread.

Anyhow, with that said Trump is still a racist and a complete idiot
but just so ya'll know

the worst thing about this country is partisanship and because of this thread that partisan idiot adevilyoumayknow will be negging me shortly HAHAHHAHA...
What a fukkin idiot!



Fukk Trump... but ya

wasn't a thread like this posted before?

Anyways there is a new bombshell report from NY times that might be the first direct proof of collusion between members of Trump’s circle and the Russians when it comes to election interference.

Bombshell! Trump Jr. Was Reportedly Promised Dirt on Hillary Clinton Before Russian Lawyer Meeting

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

This has already been discussed. The Intel agencies that matter on this topic, were in agreement

It's really agency not agencies
it's 3 agencies yes but they all got the same data from the NSA
so the FBI and CIA got all their information from the NSA

So it's really one, but I won't convince everyone on that so keep saying 3
I mean wtv

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

wasn't a thread like this posted before?

Anyways there is a new bombshell report from NY times that might be the first direct proof of collusion between members of Trump’s circle and the Russians when it comes to election interference.

Bombshell! Trump Jr. Was Reportedly Promised Dirt on Hillary Clinton Before Russian Lawyer Meeting

Yes, but this thread is about the NYTimes correcting an error and doing it incorrectly
This bombshell you speak of is also from the NYTimes...

Anyhow... developing story...
For the record, I'm in no way pro-trump, I just want this Russia nonsense to go away
Have you noticed nobody is talking about issues or policies?

 

[Pressure]

Yes, but this thread is about the NYTimes correcting an error and doing it incorrectly
This bombshell you speak of is also from the NYTimes...

Anyhow... developing story...
For the record, I'm in no way pro-trump, I just want this Russia nonsense to go away
Have you noticed nobody is talking about issues or policies?

Who are you blaming?

The republicans control the house, senate and the oval.

The lack of policy discussions is a result of a lack of governance.

 

[DEAD7]

The damage is done...

 

[ORDER_66]

can't even find dirt on the dirtiest president in history...

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

Who are you blaming?

The republicans control the house, senate and the oval.

The lack of policy discussions is a result of a lack of governance.

I mean the media breh

 

[Pressure]

I mean the media breh

OK. Regarding policy, what aren't they reporting?

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Why does it matter how many?

Point is, all the people with access to the info agree that Russia meddled in the election.

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

Why does it matter how many?

Point is, all the people with access to the info agree that Russia meddled in the election.

There is no proof yet.
Mainly because the DNC refused to let the FBI have access to the hacked servers.

Think about it, nothing but Russia Russia Russia on the news for months but still no proof.
You dont find that odd?

Im not saying dont cover it, but the level of coverage while not having proof is suspect.

Why does that matter?
What % of america would you guess knows that there is still no proof?
What % of america still thinks its 17 agencies?

Thats why, they are shaping public opinion.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

There is no proof yet.
Mainly because the DNC refused to let the FBI have access to the hacked servers.

This is absolutely untrue. FBI/CIA etc don't make public statements about things that have no proof. People don't resign from their jobs or retroactively register as foreign agents over "no proof" Furthermore according to Comey the FBI was able to access the servers in a way that satisfied their needs, with or without the DNC handing over access.

hink about it, nothing but Russia Russia Russia on the news for months but still no proof.
You dont find that odd?

First off, there's been plenty on the news other than Russia. Second if this goes as deep as it seems, it should be the number one story. This would be a act of war, and the biggest direct threat to America that we've seen in a long time.

Im not saying dont cover it, but the level of coverage while not having proof is suspect.

Would be no coverage if there was no proof. This isn't just some guy speculating. This is American intelligence telling you our democracy was atacked by a foreign enemy.

Why does that matter?
What % of america would you guess knows that there is still no proof?
What % of america still thinks its 17 agencies?

Thats why, they are shaping public opinion.

Only ones still running with the "still no proof" talking point are trump supporters and/or dummies.

Which one are you

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

This is absolutely untrue. FBI/CIA etc don't make public statements about things that have no proof. People don't resign from their jobs or retroactively register as foreign agents over "no proof" Furthermore according to Comey the FBI was able to access the servers in a way that satisfied their needs, with or without the DNC handing over access.


First off, there's been plenty on the news other than Russia. Second if this goes as deep as it seems, it should be the number one story. This would be a act of war, and the biggest direct threat to America that we've seen in a long time.


Would be no coverage if there was no proof. This isn't just some guy speculating. This is American intelligence telling you our democracy was atacked by a foreign enemy.


Only ones still running with the "still no proof" talking point are trump supporters and/or dummies.

Which one are you

If there is proof tell me what is it?
Simple, you tell me what the proof is.
But you won't because there is none.

Secondly you saying it should be the #1 major story? With no proof? Oh there is proof.. Oh ok then tell me what is it?

Secondly Clinton/al gore took campaign money from the chinese, there was no coverage on that.

Thirdly where is the nees headline on this?

 

[MeachTheMonster]

If there is proof tell me what is it?
Simple, you tell me what the proof is.
But you won't because there is none.

Secondly you saying it should be the #1 major story? With no proof? Oh there is proof.. Oh ok then tell me what is it?

Secondly Clinton/al gore took campaign money from the chinese, there was no coverage on that.

Thirdly where is the nees headline on this?

Not even jumping down the dummy rabbit whole with you.

You say it's been all over the news, so you should have seen the proof by now.

We have a big ass thread with all the info you need.

I'm not in the business of educating the willfully ignorant