Official TLR Diddy trial thread….***THE VERDICT IS IN**** ***NOT GUILTY ON RICO***

[I'm Blackman]

Yeah it's like I'm living in an alternate reality. People actually think Puff is winning the case? The feds don't like losing and they know he had real resources to fight the case so they were going to make it iron clad before issuing an indictment. DHS raided his Miami home in March 2024, they didn't issue the indictment until September that year. He's completely fukking cooked.

It seems like some people don't even completely understand on what Puff is charged with.

Yeah i dont get it either.

I think people get caught up in the micro aspects of one persons testimony as a "gotcha" moment. Or they really dont understand the charges.

The case is a big case and prosecutors present it as a whole. When they do their closing arguments, theyre gonna say (i think) to be convicted of racketeering a person must do a, b, c and Mr Combs has done a, b, c.....therefore based upon the law hes guilty. Prostitution over state lines for example has been proven. Or this assistant paid for the prostitutes and then they were remibursed by combs. The threats, the coercion, the use of power to keep the criminal activity going.

I dont know if he's going to be convicted on all charges but some of these charges are "slam.dunks". Ive heard criminal attorneys say im not even sure how i would defend this and then a coli poster will be like Puff walking free on every charge.


I think people who dont follow court cases where expecting kilos of cocaine or proof he killed Pac or some obvious shyt. In peoples mind hes just "a partying freaky gay nikka who was doing freaky shyt"....but he again he wasnt charged with that. He was charged with doing specific things that constitute Rico crimes.

Then besides the charges and the law.....the climate of culture affects every case. Me Too shadow still looms and while some people joke about Cassie and see her as a gold digger...I would venture to say most of that jury sees a now pregant woman who was abused and when she tried to leave was abused. So i think a lot of the jury are against him just on gp.

We'll see...but i think its a wrap.

 

[Grifter]

Photos of the skrippers/escorts have been released

No diddy

13 they were sampling dudes like a box of chocolates

 

[O.T.I.S.]

Distribute? C’mon, he was obtaining drugs for recreation use.

Exactly

he’s not selling drugs, he’s using the drugs he bought through a 3rd party and so was everyone with him.

Same shyt nikkas do daily



Dude was a drug addict not a distributor for profit

 

[RubioTheCruel]

Yeah i dont get it either.

I think people get caught up in the micro aspects of one persons testimony as a "gotcha" moment. Or they really dont understand the charges.

The case is a big case and prosecutors present it as a whole. When they do their closing arguments, theyre gonna say (i think) to be convicted of racketeering a person must do a, b, c and Mr Combs has done a, b, c.....therefore based upon the law hes guilty. Prostitution over state lines for example has been proven. Or this assistant paid for the prostitutes and then they were remibursed by combs. The threats, the coercion, the use of power to keep the criminal activity going.

I dont know if he's going to be convicted on all charges but some of these charges are "slam.dunks". Ive heard criminal attorneys say im not even sure how i would defend this and then a coli poster will be like Puff walking free on every charge.


I think people who dont follow court cases where expecting kilos of cocaine or proof he killed Pac or some obvious shyt. In peoples mind hes just "a partying freaky gay nikka who was doing freaky shyt"....but he again he wasnt charged with that. He was charged with doing specific things that constitute Rico crimes.

Then besides the charges and the law.....the climate of culture affects every case. Me Too shadow still looms and while some people joke about Cassie and see her as a gold digger...I would venture to say most of that jury sees a now pregant woman who was abused and when she tried to leave was abused. So i think a lot of the jury are against him just on gp.

We'll see...but i think its a wrap.

One of Puff's original defense attorneys represented bin Laden in the WTC bombing and even he was like 'nah I'm good' on this one

 

[RubioTheCruel]

Exactly

he’s not selling drugs, he’s using the drugs he bought through a 3rd party and so was everyone with him.

Same shyt nikkas do daily



Dude was a drug addict not a distributor for profit

You do know that's illegal right? There's no federal distinction between social and commercial distribution of drugs? That's what Puff's being accused of. Y'all really need to go read the indictment. It's only 14 pages. Here. I'll even help you.

At all times relevant to this Indictment, SEAN COMBS, a/k/a "Puff Daddy," a/k/a
"P. Diddy," a/k/a "Diddy," a/k/a "PD," a/k/a "Love," the defendant, engaged in a persistent and
pervasive pattern of abuse toward women and other individuals. This abuse was, at times, verbal,
emotional, physical, and sexual. As part of his pattern of abuse, COMBS manipulated women to
participate in highly orchestrated performances of sexual activity with male commercial sex
workers. At times, COMBS, and others acting at his direction, made arrangements for women and
commercial sex workers to fly to COMBS' location. COMBS ensured participation from the
women by, among other things, obtaining and distributing narcotics to them, controlling their
careers, leveraging his financial support and threatening to cut off the same, and using intimidation
and violence

 

[Swirv]

The punisher speaks

 

[Standing on business]

I dont know if he's going to be convicted on all charges but some of these charges are "slam.dunks". Ive heard criminal attorneys say im not even sure how i would defend this and then a coli poster will be like Puff walking free on every charge.


I think people who dont follow court cases where expecting kilos of cocaine or proof he killed Pac or some obvious shyt. In peoples mind hes just "a partying freaky gay nikka who was doing freaky shyt"....but he again he wasnt charged with that. He was charged with doing specific things that constitute Rico crimes.

Then besides the charges and the law.....the climate of culture affects every case. Me Too shadow still looms and while some people joke about Cassie and see her as a gold digger...I would venture to say most of that jury sees a now pregant woman who was abused and when she tried to leave was abused. So i think a lot of the jury are against him just on gp.

We'll see...but i think its a wrap.

Quote the post that says this

 

[Malcolmxxx_23]

Ppl defending Diddy like he a family member lol

 

[King Poetic]

U have all these people testifying and if u think all of them are lying on every key question u need to have a seat with puffy..

This nikka is reynolds wrap

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

You're not smart enough to have this conversation.

I was providing an real example, something you can not do, of how when a drug qualifies for distribution.

But sense you want federal law let's do that too.

Federal law, primarily through the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), addresses both drug possession and drug distribution. The CSA classifies substances into five schedules based on their potential for abuse and medical use.

Drug Possession Federal law (21 U.S.C. § 844) prohibits unauthorized possession of controlled substances. The penalties for simple possession can vary depending on the type and amount of the drug, as well as the individual's prior criminal history.

First offense:

• Up to one year of imprisonment and a fine of at least $1,000
• Can lead to harsher penalties, including increased jail time and fines.

Drug Distribution (including Possession with Intent to Distribute):

Federal law prohibits the manufacture, distribution, and possession of controlled substances with the intent to distribute (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)). This often refers to drug trafficking activities.

Federal involvement in drug cases often arises in the following situations:

• Crossing state lines:
• Transporting drugs across state borders.
• Using phones, internet, or mail to facilitate drug trafficking.
• Large quantities of drugs: Possession of quantities exceeding certain thresholds set by federal law can indicate intent to distribute.
• Federal property: Offenses occurring on federal property, such as national parks
• If agencies like the DEA or FBI are involved in the investigation.
• Organized crime connections:
• If the drug trafficking is linked to organized crime networks.
• Use of violence or firearms: Involvement of weapons in drug trafficking activities.

I have always talked about distribution not legality.

You said buying drugs for personal use wasn't illegal. That was you. My point was about distribution. Again, you can't keep up.

I didn’t say this. Quote me. It should be easy to find.

 

[BiggWebb79]

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

From my review, the defense is trying to have the search omitted because the agent admitted they knew where Diddy, the target, was the entire time. I guess the argument could be illegal search, planted evidence, etcétera. It seems the defense is taking this personally now. Kid Cudi isn’t testifying today and may not be permitted because his testimony may be considered hearsay.

 

[Mank1nd]

Long as he stay his ass in the corner I wouldnt GAF

"What's up playboy?"

 

[BiggWebb79]

 

[O.T.I.S.]

Gotdamn, I literally busted out laughing at this