Official TLR Diddy trial thread….***THE VERDICT IS IN**** ***NOT GUILTY ON RICO***

Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
45,445
Reputation
3,196
Daps
111,454
Reppin
NULL
I must have missed something because all his drugs to use were in an LV bag. He didn’t sell drugs and had them as party favors.

Yeah. I’m guessing somebody was an informant or undercover. He wasn’t redistributing the drugs for profit so I don’t know where the racketeering comes into play…. Getting charged with just possession is different, and I do think he’s charged with that
 

skylove4

Veteran
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
19,400
Reputation
3,962
Daps
92,575
Two words for you: Keith Richards.
I can top that.
ozzy-bat.gif

I heard he snorted fire ants like cocaine before:gucci::mjlol:
 

JamesJabdi

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
4,521
Reputation
1,362
Daps
26,729
"Coli guys dont Know about the law"
"Breh and breh associates"

Meanwhile.....

David Seltzer, a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor for the Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office Cyber Crimes Unit, said he believes both sides made key points toward their case during the first five days of testimony.

"One thing is clear, this is a case about domestic violence, and Mr. Combs is no saint," Seltzer told Newsweek. "But one thing he is not, in my opinion, is a racketeer based on the evidence presented to date. The government is not meeting its burden of proof, and the defense is doing a great job at eliciting necessary and damaging testimony from the government's witnesses, including their key witness, Ms. Ventura."

Lonnie Hart Jr., a New York-based defense attorney and former assistant district attorney in Brooklyn, said Ventura's often-graphic depiction of Combs' sexual proclivities revealed the Bad Boy Records founder as an "extremely paranoid, insecure and violent" man who subjected her to unspeakable abuse and psychological torture during their 11-year relationship.

"However, the testimony as disturbing as it was, has done little so far to prove allegations of racketeering and sex trafficking against Mr. Combs," Hart told Newsweek, adding that the government does have time to right its ship.

"Cassie organized some and hired 'staff,'" said Ronald Chapman II, a defense attorney with extensive experience in racketeering cases. "Her texts were lurid and enthusiastic. This is direct evidence of consent. The only way to rebut that is to erode the concept of agency — that is a dangerous proposition."
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
38,720
Reputation
3,630
Daps
106,159
"Coli guys dont Know about the law"
"Breh and breh associates"

Meanwhile.....

David Seltzer, a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor for the Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office Cyber Crimes Unit, said he believes both sides made key points toward their case during the first five days of testimony.

"One thing is clear, this is a case about domestic violence, and Mr. Combs is no saint," Seltzer told Newsweek. "But one thing he is not, in my opinion, is a racketeer based on the evidence presented to date. The government is not meeting its burden of proof, and the defense is doing a great job at eliciting necessary and damaging testimony from the government's witnesses, including their key witness, Ms. Ventura."

Lonnie Hart Jr., a New York-based defense attorney and former assistant district attorney in Brooklyn, said Ventura's often-graphic depiction of Combs' sexual proclivities revealed the Bad Boy Records founder as an "extremely paranoid, insecure and violent" man who subjected her to unspeakable abuse and psychological torture during their 11-year relationship.

"However, the testimony as disturbing as it was, has done little so far to prove allegations of racketeering and sex trafficking against Mr. Combs," Hart told Newsweek, adding that the government does have time to right its ship.

"Cassie organized some and hired 'staff,'" said Ronald Chapman II, a defense attorney with extensive experience in racketeering cases. "Her texts were lurid and enthusiastic. This is direct evidence of consent. The only way to rebut that is to erode the concept of agency — that is a dangerous proposition."
He is wrong let these folks tell it. :troll:

It can only be one way.
 
Top