papa johns ceo threatening lay offs

Onpoint12

Banned
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
177
Reputation
0
Daps
105
Reppin
NULL
CEO's getting on they best bull-sh1t ; I could understand business wise but this feel like it's done off butt-hurt reasoning

:pacspit:







The first crop of employers has begun to punish their workers in response to President Obama’s re-election last Tuesday. Sour grapes are the new “it” topping for one international pizza chain, as they plan on punishing employees for the result of the presidential election.

Papa Johns’ CEO John Schnatter made remarks to a small group at Edison State College's Collier County campus last Wednesday, the day after the election, that his employees might in fact face reduced work hours because President Obama defeated Mitt Romney in his bid to be re-elected.

Schnatter is doing this; because instead of see his profits dip a modicum, would rather penalize his employees and sacrifice their well-being. He of course is perfectly within his right to do so, but when he remarks about his care for their health and welfare…can he be believed?

Papa Johns has over 4000 stores across the globe. and in 2010 Papa Johns enjoyed a revenue of 1.1 billion dollars. So, we can obviously see why it would be financially cumbersome to offer healthcare to their hardworking employees.

John Schnatter stands in Times Square pointing to his image on the big

Under the Affordable Care Act it is mandated that any employee working more than 30 hours per week be covered by their employer’s health plan. By cutting workers’ Schnatter is avoiding the burdensome task of carrying them on his group health plan.

Earlier in the summer Schnatter told shareholders that me would need to increase the cost of his pizzas 11 to 14 cents to cover the cost of 'Obamacare.' But this quick change to now slashing hours to avoid covering healthcare, reeks of nothing more than a political stunt.

Schnatter is not the first CEO to intimidate employees over the re-election of the President. The Wednesday after Election Day, Robert E. Murray, CEO of Murray Energy read a prayer laced with anti-Obama rhetoric to employees and then announced that there would be layoffs.
Murray, earlier in the summer had been accused of forcing his company’s coal miners to attend a Mitt Romney rally, and blamed Obama’s “war on coal” for the more than 150 employees who were fired.

The old saying that it is “good to be the king” rings true in these situations. CEOs are using their cushy leather chairs as bully pulpits to send political messages, at the expense of those who keep them in those cushy leather chairs.







Papa Johns' CEO cutting worker's hours in response to Obama winning re-election - Cincinnati Health Care | Examiner.com
 

havoc00

Pro
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Messages
18,824
Reputation
-188
Daps
1,128
2 million free Pizzas



:rudy:




262870_10151415772479392_444560005_n.jpg
 

Rarely-Wrong Liggins

Name another Liggins hot I'm just honest.
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
36,180
Reputation
12,778
Daps
139,399
Reppin
Staff
These CEO's are putting their own lives in danger. You fire people because you don't like the outcome of an election? DO they not realize they are destroying peoples livelihood for this type of nonsense? You don't know who you're pissing off like that.

If they die, they die. :hmm:

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
 

NVME

Rookie
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
288
Reputation
0
Daps
219
Reppin
NULL
CEO's getting on they best bull-sh1t ; I could understand business wise but this feel like it's done off butt-hurt reasoning

:pacspit:







The first crop of employers has begun to punish their workers in response to President Obama’s re-election last Tuesday. Sour grapes are the new “it” topping for one international pizza chain, as they plan on punishing employees for the result of the presidential election.

Papa Johns’ CEO John Schnatter made remarks to a small group at Edison State College's Collier County campus last Wednesday, the day after the election, that his employees might in fact face reduced work hours because President Obama defeated Mitt Romney in his bid to be re-elected.

Schnatter is doing this; because instead of see his profits dip a modicum, would rather penalize his employees and sacrifice their well-being. He of course is perfectly within his right to do so, but when he remarks about his care for their health and welfare…can he be believed?

Papa Johns has over 4000 stores across the globe. and in 2010 Papa Johns enjoyed a revenue of 1.1 billion dollars. So, we can obviously see why it would be financially cumbersome to offer healthcare to their hardworking employees.

John Schnatter stands in Times Square pointing to his image on the big

Under the Affordable Care Act it is mandated that any employee working more than 30 hours per week be covered by their employer’s health plan. By cutting workers’ Schnatter is avoiding the burdensome task of carrying them on his group health plan.

Earlier in the summer Schnatter told shareholders that me would need to increase the cost of his pizzas 11 to 14 cents to cover the cost of 'Obamacare.' But this quick change to now slashing hours to avoid covering healthcare, reeks of nothing more than a political stunt.

Schnatter is not the first CEO to intimidate employees over the re-election of the President. The Wednesday after Election Day, Robert E. Murray, CEO of Murray Energy read a prayer laced with anti-Obama rhetoric to employees and then announced that there would be layoffs.
Murray, earlier in the summer had been accused of forcing his company’s coal miners to attend a Mitt Romney rally, and blamed Obama’s “war on coal” for the more than 150 employees who were fired.

The old saying that it is “good to be the king” rings true in these situations. CEOs are using their cushy leather chairs as bully pulpits to send political messages, at the expense of those who keep them in those cushy leather chairs.







Papa Johns' CEO cutting worker's hours in response to Obama winning re-election - Cincinnati Health Care | Examiner.com



This is an article written to provoke a reaction and not present a business decision. You guys can hate but this is clearly a one sided article...and I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with the CEO because the article didn't give me nearly enough information to evaluate his decision from a business perspective. Although I do think in business treating employees right is the key to success... so I'd go out of my way to fight new costs in a way that didn't hurt my employees.

I love when these article use revenue in a way that makes it sound like profit... If it is a decision made out of an emotional reaction to the election then I agree with you guys.
 

Sad Bunny

they/them
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
76,423
Reputation
3,086
Daps
170,148
This is an article written to provoke a reaction and not present a business decision. You guys can hate but this is clearly a one sided article...and I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with the CEO because the article didn't give me nearly enough information to evaluate his decision from a business perspective. Although I do think in business treating employees right is the key to success... so I'd go out of my way to fight new costs in a way that didn't hurt my employees.

I love when these article use revenue in a way that makes it sound like profit... If it is a decision made out of an emotional reaction to the election then I agree with you guys.
...
yup very one sided

if its a blog or editorial, thats cool

but not for a news article
 
Top