Patrick Mahomes: “I’m not a big fan” of 18 games

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,539
Reputation
2,451
Daps
63,961
Reppin
NYC
Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes is the face of the NFL. He’s not the face of the NFL’s push for an inevitable 18th regular-season game.

In an interview with CNBC Sport, Mahomes addressed the topic of another game that counts.

“I think that you’d have to find a way to have more bye weeks, more time spread out,” Mahomes told Alex Sherman of CNBC. “Because, I mean, you’ve seen the amount of injuries that have kind of piled up there at the end of seasons, and you want to have the best players playing in the biggest games. And so if there were a way to get to 18 games, I’m not — I’m not a big fan of it. But if there were a way, I think you got to add some bye weeks in there to give more time for guys’ bodies.”

Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow previously has argued that, if there’s another regular-season game, there should be a second bye.

A second bye makes a ton of sense. Yes, the network hated the two-bye season of 1993, because it diluted the number of week-in and week-out games. But there are six more franchises now than there were then.

The other problem is scheduling. The league justifies an 18th game in part by pointing to the reality of a Super Bowl on President’s Day Weekend. Adding an extra bye will result in the Super Bowl overshooting President’s Day — unless the NFL is willing to revert to the days of Week 1 on Labor Day Weekend. (And maybe it should.)

However it plays out, an 18th game is coming. The only question left is whether the NFL Players Association agrees to it before the 2030 season, or whether the NFL has to lock them out until they inevitably take the best deal on the table before missing game checks in 2031.

 

jwonder

Superstar
Joined
Aug 30, 2014
Messages
25,827
Reputation
-1,269
Daps
38,815
Reppin
DADE County
I actually agree with this fakkit ass pale face. How about expanding the damn playoffs more than having extra meaningless games?
 

Harry B

Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
32,609
Reputation
-917
Daps
65,798
If only he was more vocal about fully guaranteed contracts and doing his part to make it happen :sas2:
Who does that help if the hard cap is the same? That just means that one player who is not playing will be stealing money from another player who is playing. With 53 guys, a hard cap and frequent injuries you need flexibility. I’d rather see them have a policy like the nba where they must pay out say 90-95% of the cap.

Other than that, I don’t even know why I care about labor policies for one the richest group of workers in the world, when I can get fired tomorrow :mjlol:
 

DaMos Supreme

All Star
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
1,058
Reputation
360
Daps
3,176
Reppin
NULL
Take off thursday games. Them shyts should only be played on thanksgiving.
The only other game on a Thursday that would be tolerable is the season opener IMO. Maybe I’m in the minority on the idea of the NFL going back to just 16 games with the top two teams in NFC and AFC having byes. But NFL is in bed with too many business partners and sees nothing but the money. They feel that they can do anything in the world of sports because of the damn near monopoly they have.
 
Top