Phil Jackson's coaching tree vs. Red Auerbach's

madness

Taking my talents to South Beach
Bushed
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
19,374
Reputation
4,376
Daps
106,027
Reppin
City of Zoes
Phil-Jackson-Coaching-Tree.png






1162136687_6049.gif
 
  • Dap
Reactions: Ill

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,331
Reputation
5,935
Daps
94,017
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
thibodeau not being under van gundy thus under riley is a fail. they shoulda just done don nelson, riley and phil for timeliness. plus they left out bill russell for red and steve kerr (phil/pop combined?). just sucks all around.
 

intruder

SOHH Class of 2003 and CASUAL sports fan
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
30,412
Reputation
4,506
Daps
58,133
Reppin
Love
Phil produces, period.
Cant say the same about is assistants. :francis:
Meanwhile Riley produces and his assistants produce too. You are supposed to be a reflection of those who raides/trained you. Phil's assistants letting him down
 

Jesus Shuttlesworth

I Got Game
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
11,987
Reputation
1,835
Daps
20,228
Reppin
Sovereignty
If you think about it, doesn't a successful coaching tree actually take away from the patriarch?

Like if anybody can do it, doesn't that mean your system is responsible for your own success? I could see if said coach was the architect of the system he coached, which Phil Jackson was not. But not just with Phil and Red. I'm looking at it like if the next man can step right in and replace you, then doesn't that mean you're replaceable?

You're supposed to coach players, not coaches. As long as my teams were successful, I couldn't care less about those trying to emulate me. In fact, low key I would probably hope they fail just to show my own greatness. :yeshrug: :pachaha:
 
Top