Photos of 19th Century Arab Slave Trade of East Africans

cole phelps

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2013
Messages
6,412
Reputation
5,121
Daps
28,517
Livingstone-Pt2-2.jpg

Arab captors and Zanzibar workers

f6973393807f1ddec9e232fa46013b97.jpg

Archival image of the slave trade depicting East African slaves taken aboard HMS Daphne.


Slavezanzibar2.JPG


Photograph of a slave boy in Zanzibar. 'An Arab master's punishment for a slight offence. ' c. 1890.


b56463baa744c252b90e161c570ba35e.jpg



Servant_or_slave_woman_in_Mogadishu.jpg


A female Bantu slave in Mogadishu (1882–1883).


Egyptian_Slavemaster_and_Slave.jpg


Egyptian slavemaster and Waswahili slave

res-boy01s.jpg



e9081.jpg

'Slaves captured from a dhow' (Arab sailing vessel)
EDIT- New pics



Africans sold into slavery by Arab merchants. This photo was taken in the 1890s
 
Last edited:

Entrapta310

:umad?:
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Messages
5,622
Reputation
-1,241
Daps
5,791
This is where the Europeans got their idea of slavery... frm the Arabs.
shyt has been going on in northern egypt since the time of the pyramids being built.
They were too powerful for the Kushytes.
In turn, they made slaves out of some of them.
You had dark skin? You were a slave in Northern Egypt.
 

KravenMorehead™

Barrel Brothers.®
Joined
Nov 4, 2014
Messages
33,272
Reputation
9,860
Daps
95,508
Reppin
NoVA
quotes i've read around the net:

I don't know why people try to make some type of significant distinction between the people who invaded Africa forcing Islam on African people and the people who invaded Africa forcing Christianity on African people. Those people that we COMMONLY see over in the "middle east" are descendants of Aryan invaders from the north. They did the same thing in the "middle east" to the original African population that they've done to the original African population in North Africa, wiped them out through warfare including rape. It's the same damn people we're dealing with. Same fundamental pattern of behavior.

Dahia-Al Kahina

Dahia al-Kahina became leader of the African resistance. She fought against the Arab incursion in North Africa where under her leadership Africans fought back fiercely and drove the Arab army northward into Tripolitania. Her opposition to the Arab incursion was purely nationalistic, since she favored neither Christians nor Moslems. She is generally held to have been a Jewess but we believe that she could just as well have followed the old Carthaginian religion. This differs from Judaism but also shares some affinities with it. There are, of course, Black Jews in many parts of Africa such as the Falasha of Ethiopia and the Lemba of South Africa. Arab records describe her as having "dark skin, a mass of hair and huge eyes" - the comment referring to her hair may refer to an afro or perhaps locks.
Dr. John Clarke describes her as a nationalist who favored no particular religion. This may explain her effectiveness in bringing together a united front against the invaders. She counterattacked the invaders and drove them into Tripolitania. This was so effective that some Arabs doubted whether Africa could be taken. *MESSAGE*

As one African army was beaten another replaced them. The Arabs seized Carthage in 698 AD. Dahia defeated them and instituted a scorched earth policy to prevent the Arabs from being able to find crops to feed on in the region. That desolation can be seen even today in southern Tunisia. Eventually, however, the Arabs returned. Dahia was finally defeated in battle in 705 AD.

After her death the Arabs began to change their strategy in advancing their faith and their power in Africa. The resistance to the southward spread of Islam was so great in some areas that some of the wives of African kings committed suicide to avoid falling into the hands of the Berbers and Arabs who showed no mercy to the people who would not be converted to Islam. She prevented Islam's southward spread into the Western Sudan but North Africa was overrun. Today Black people are a minority in North Africa. Furthermore, Africans in Mauretania and Sudan continue to face enslavement.

Sure there were Black People in Arabia. We were the first EVERYWHERE on the planet. No doubt about that. And we are the ones that came up with the culture and religion that was there in Arabia PRIOR to islam. Just like we were the ones that came up with the culture and religion in Canaan PRIOR to judaism and just like we were the ones that came up with the culture and religion in Kemet PRIOR to christianity.

WE BY OURSELVES didn't come up with those 3 pseudo-religions, however. Those 3 b*stardizations were born AFTER mass invasions of our countries by foreign peoples e.g. the Habiru/ Apiru and other peoples from the aryan invasions into Canaan prior to judaism, the greeks and more importantly the romans into Kemet prior to christianity and christianized Axum and later Persia into Arabia prior to islam. I kid you not. Check the record. In each case you will find African People practicing their own traditional religions for thousands of years and ONLY IMMEDIATELY AFTER some major invasion where power changes hands do you see a religion pop up that is inherently hostile to the religion that had always been practiced in the region in question. How long had the Black People in Arabia been there practicing their traditional religion? But then we have Aksum, which became christianized around 333 a.d. They've always had contact with Arabia, often times setting up strongholds there for brief periods of time. Then in the 6th century, they occupied Arabia for almost 100 years until they were chased out by the invading persians. That's TWO major invasions, the most important being the one that lasted longer and where the power structure of the invading force was CHRISTIAN. All of a sudden, in the 7th century, tadaaaaaaaa, islam is born.

This is what they always do. African religions have certain commonalities, one of the main ones being that they are NOT based on evangelism or proselytism. Why? Because the traditional African understanding is that everybody has their own personal access to the spirit or NOT. Simple as that. We practice ancestral religions and you can't change your ancestors.


From the book "La Grande Geste Du Mali, Volume 1: Des Origines a la Fondation de L'Empire, Karthala-Arsan, Paris, 2000 (second edition) we have the following from the griot Wa Kamissoko:

"When Islam overcame the traditional religion, each clan was ordered to select an ancestor from among the personalities mentioned in the "four books that came down from heaven, " that is to say, the four books God revealed to the prophets. That is how Djon Bilali, or Bilal, bondsman to the prophet Mahomet, came to be the ancestor of the Manding. But in fact, as everyone knows, the ancestors of the Keitas and the Konates lived a long time in Wagadou before migrating to Mali, where their descendants have lived for over 2, 700 years. (Vol. 1, p.26)."



Select an ancestor? The only time BULLshyt like that ^^^ is done is when we're dealing with one of these conversion based religions. And white folk have been trying to do the same thing with African religions on the West Coast, most notably the Yoruba religion. Whenever they come into things, they try to make it universal somehow so that they get accepted into it. This is how they infiltrate and become our rulers. So when they(white folk) come in, they start talking about how Eshu is the devil, Obatala is a white man and Oshun & Yemaya are homosexual and are the matron saints of lesbians. Since ancient times, white people's main thing has been finding ways to make THEM and their PERVERTED CULTURES a part of "the divine whole" or a part of nature. So in making Eshu the devil, evil has become sanctioned now as a part of divinity rather than what we have traditionally put forth that it comes from individuals' choices rather than by divine design. Obatala has always been known as the Lord of the White (Oosala). The color associated with him is white. There are colors associated with all Orisas, Arusi, Vodu, Nommo, Nkisi, Abosom, Neteru etc. And there are spiritual/ metaphysical reasons for it, but they went with RACE
laughing.gif
and said Obatala was an actual WHITE MAN aka caucasian. Now, this is BULLshyt according to the traditional religion that's there, but for various reasons having to do with us being a conquered people some African priests have gone along with this bullshyt. Brings more white folk with money into it too. I doubt I'll have to explain the homosexual thing, but as we can see this is the last great barrier that they're trying to break through with us.

You can take it all the way back to the greek invasion of Kemet and find this kind of thing going down. Some of us wouldn't accept them as our rulers so they had to "marry" into the power structure. Often times what we're dealing with as it concerns the Ptolemies or greek rule in Kemet in general are mulattoes i.e. Barrack Obamas. Most of us still said fukk that and went back further into Africa. Soter I creates Serapis which is a fusion of Ausar and Apis with HIS appearance. He then closes down all other temples to other Neteru and makes it so that only Serapis in HIS IMAGE is to be worshiped. This is all jedi-mind trick bullshyt meant to make being conquered(and thus acceptance of whites and their ways) palatable to us so that we put up less and less resistance.

I love learning about my people's history everywhere, but OF COURSE there needs to be emphasis placed on where we actually come from and that ain't Arabia or India or Malaysia or any of them other places. It's the place that so many of us are embarrassed about because it has suffered so much denigration. And when we DO tell of the history of those of our people in those other places, I'm a lot more receptive to it when we leave OUT the CONTENT of the pseudo-religions created by white people/ arabs WITH Black People whose countries have been invaded and taken over. Those books i.e. the bible, quran, talmud etc. are NOT history books. And they need to tell the truth about the FACT that the creation of these religions are ALWAYS a matter of the collaborative efforts of invading whites/ arabs into the countries of Black People.

This is like the one-drop rule being applied historically to religions and that is inherently a distortion of reality i.e. disinformation.

Why would Black People left to their own devices create religions that forbid their own traditional religions? We know of ONE AFRICAN who ever tried to do that-banning our traditional religions, closing and/ or defacing our temples, banning images of anything but symbols of his personal "religion", erasing certain names and only putting the one he wanted for his own personal "religion" and of course the "religion" placed emphasis on him as the intermediary between humans and the "one and only, true god". After his death, our people promptly banned HIM
laughing.gif
from the face of history.

Aside from that incident in history, the PATTERN that we always see is that whenever our culture and religions are banned or made illegal, it's ALWAYS because of a foreign element involved. And if there is one thing religions like judaism, christianity and islam do, it's denigrate and ban our religions even to the point of making the practice of them a capital offense.

They aren't the only ones who wrote seemingly fondly of our people or even other people that they've conquered. That chasm between their words and their actions is traditional. I've always told folks that when we look at the history, we see that the ACTION/ BEHAVIOR of racism came BEFORE the doctrine. The doctrine was created and refined by certain people later in order to clarify a collective vision and direction. So you're not really going to find a bunch of negative stuff written about Africans prior to being conquered. It's hard to write about us as being beneath them when at the time we had the most advanced civilizations and everyone knew it. But you'll find a mixture of sentiment in the commentaries AFTER they've conquered this and that nation, made some segue into it or at the very least the point at which they've decided to attempt to conquer a nation. It helps to minimize cognitive dissonance.

I always consider their actions first and they began wiping us out in Asia-the "middle east" and India and so on waaaaaay before that 8th century ce time period. What some of that represents is merely the old tactic of flattery-the lubricant of social infiltration. And different groups of them advance at different rates due to many factors including different tactics-the main ones being to this day total annihilation, segregation or miscegenation/ assimilation. The writing (if any) has subtle differences in each case.
 
Last edited:

Entrapta310

:umad?:
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Messages
5,622
Reputation
-1,241
Daps
5,791
The slavemasters in the first picture look like they could be East African.


I don't think they are the masters. The last pic has slaves in those same clothes.

Plus look in the doorway of the first pic.. the guy looks european/arab
 

A1aaa

Respectful Fade Runner & Card Puller
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
7,012
Reputation
3,110
Daps
45,409
zanzibar is :ohlawd:... spent a lot of time there a few years ago.



but it has an ugly past people refuse to confront. many zanzibaris and coastal swahili people there are proud of their supposed shirazi (persian) / omani / yemeni heritage despite the history :mjpls:. people believe swahili was an arab culture exclusively when it was more so an primarily african culture with arab infleunces
 
Last edited:
Top