Pilots, Doctors & Scientists Tell Truth about Chemtrails
- Thread starter thekingsmen
- Start date
Man fukk I don't really have time to watch this whole thing so I just skipped to one of the docs that was quoting a paper and looked into it:
10:45
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a446266.pdf
First off the dude doesn't know how to pronounce "alveolar"
Then neglecting the fact that this was an in vitro experiment not an in vivo experiment IN HUMANS, he says "your lungs" instead of a rat's lung
Then he makes the largest most unscientific leap ever
"What they found was... these particles when YOU'RE exposed to them long enough, it suppresses the ability of your white blood cells to defend you from airborne infections coming into YOUR lungs... so it suppresses your immune system"
Motherfukker, there's no way YOU OR ANYONE can assume that from the study that was done.
Because:
1) This was done in fukking rats in a lab, not on humans.
2) Macrophages are one type of nonspecific white blood cell. He just conveniently forgot that the whole complement system and that neutrophils, NK cells, eosinophils can all combat infection too.
3) Nothing in the paper showed that this shyt was suppressing your immune system. It's actually the opposite:
"a positive control and 59 demonstrated these cells do produce these inflammatory products at expected levels. Exposure to each size of aluminum nanoparticles produced no statistical difference between the amount of cytokine or nitric oxide produced from cells exposed compared to cells not exposed."
4) There was no correlation made between atmospheric concentrations vs pulmonary/ intraalveolar concentrations
Then he says:
"these particles can actually suppress the ability of mitochondria, which are in the cells that help to gobble up toxins and things that are harmful to the nucleus in the reproduction process of the cells of your body. These processes are suppressed.... And therefore by breathing your particles your immune system is dramatically suppressed"
The main effect theoretical mitochondrial suppression would have would be on the metabolic processes (e.g. respiration, energy conversion etc.), not fukking macrophage reproduction
This guy is a quack and can't be trusted. You talk about conspiracies but this guy can't get basic facts straight. No doubt this guy has an ulterior motive, you can see right through it.
Anyway @thekingsmen, this is probably the last time I'm replying to you about this topic and probably most others. Waste of fukking time.
10:45
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a446266.pdf
First off the dude doesn't know how to pronounce "alveolar"
Then neglecting the fact that this was an in vitro experiment not an in vivo experiment IN HUMANS, he says "your lungs" instead of a rat's lung
Then he makes the largest most unscientific leap ever
"What they found was... these particles when YOU'RE exposed to them long enough, it suppresses the ability of your white blood cells to defend you from airborne infections coming into YOUR lungs... so it suppresses your immune system"
Motherfukker, there's no way YOU OR ANYONE can assume that from the study that was done.
Because:
1) This was done in fukking rats in a lab, not on humans.
2) Macrophages are one type of nonspecific white blood cell. He just conveniently forgot that the whole complement system and that neutrophils, NK cells, eosinophils can all combat infection too.
3) Nothing in the paper showed that this shyt was suppressing your immune system. It's actually the opposite:
"a positive control and 59 demonstrated these cells do produce these inflammatory products at expected levels. Exposure to each size of aluminum nanoparticles produced no statistical difference between the amount of cytokine or nitric oxide produced from cells exposed compared to cells not exposed."
4) There was no correlation made between atmospheric concentrations vs pulmonary/ intraalveolar concentrations
Then he says:
"these particles can actually suppress the ability of mitochondria, which are in the cells that help to gobble up toxins and things that are harmful to the nucleus in the reproduction process of the cells of your body. These processes are suppressed.... And therefore by breathing your particles your immune system is dramatically suppressed"
The main effect theoretical mitochondrial suppression would have would be on the metabolic processes (e.g. respiration, energy conversion etc.), not fukking macrophage reproduction
This guy is a quack and can't be trusted. You talk about conspiracies but this guy can't get basic facts straight. No doubt this guy has an ulterior motive, you can see right through it.
Anyway @thekingsmen, this is probably the last time I'm replying to you about this topic and probably most others. Waste of fukking time.
Man fukk I don't really have time to watch this shyt so I just skipped to one of the docs that was quoting a paper and looked into it:
10:45
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a446266.pdf
First off the dude doesn't know how to pronounce "alveolar"
Then neglecting the fact that this was an in vitro experiment not an in vivo experiment IN HUMANS, he says "your lungs" instead of a rat's lung
Then he makes the largest most unscientific leap ever
"What they found was... these particles when YOU'RE exposed to them long enough, it suppresses the ability of your white blood cells to defend you from airborne infections coming into YOUR lungs... so it suppresses your immune system"
Motherfukker, there's no way YOU OR ANYONE can assume that from the study that was done.
Because:
1) This was done in fukking rats in a lab, not on humans.
2) Macrophages are one type of nonspecific white blood cell. He just conveniently forgot that the whole complement system and that neutrophils, NK cells, eosinophils can all combat infection too.
3) Nothing in the paper showed that this shyt was suppressing your immune system. It's actually the opposite:
"a positive control and 59 demonstrated these cells do produce these inflammatory products at expected levels. Exposure to each size of aluminum nanoparticles produced no statistical difference between the amount of cytokine or nitric oxide produced from cells exposed compared to cells not exposed."
4) There was no correlation made between atmospheric concentrations vs pulmonary/ intraalveolar concentrations
Then he says:
"these particles can actually suppress the ability of mitochondria, which are in the cells that help to gobble up toxins and things that are harmful to the nucleus in the reproduction process of the cells of your body. These processes are suppressed.... And therefore by breathing your particles your immune system is dramatically suppressed"
The main effect theoretical mitochondrial suppression would have would be on the metabolic processes (e.g. respiration, energy conversion etc.), not fukking macrophage reproduction
This guy is a quack and can't be trusted. You talk about conspiracies but this guy can't get basic facts straight. No doubt this guy has an ulterior motive, you can see right through it.
Anyway @thekingsmen, this is probably the last time I'm replying to you about this topic and probably most others. Waste of fukking time.
i'm not reading all that.
Wow you got some serious issues here. There is like 30 presenters or more in this video and yet how does this change any of the video's credibility?
dap/rep comboMan fukk I don't really have time to watch this whole thing so I just skipped to one of the docs that was quoting a paper and looked into it:
10:45
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a446266.pdf
First off the dude doesn't know how to pronounce "alveolar"
Then neglecting the fact that this was an in vitro experiment not an in vivo experiment IN HUMANS, he says "your lungs" instead of a rat's lung
Then he makes the largest most unscientific leap ever
"What they found was... these particles when YOU'RE exposed to them long enough, it suppresses the ability of your white blood cells to defend you from airborne infections coming into YOUR lungs... so it suppresses your immune system"
Motherfukker, there's no way YOU OR ANYONE can assume that from the study that was done.
Because:
1) This was done in fukking rats in a lab, not on humans.
2) Macrophages are one type of nonspecific white blood cell. He just conveniently forgot that the whole complement system and that neutrophils, NK cells, eosinophils can all combat infection too.
3) Nothing in the paper showed that this shyt was suppressing your immune system. It's actually the opposite:
"a positive control and 59 demonstrated these cells do produce these inflammatory products at expected levels. Exposure to each size of aluminum nanoparticles produced no statistical difference between the amount of cytokine or nitric oxide produced from cells exposed compared to cells not exposed."
4) There was no correlation made between atmospheric concentrations vs pulmonary/ intraalveolar concentrations
Then he says:
"these particles can actually suppress the ability of mitochondria, which are in the cells that help to gobble up toxins and things that are harmful to the nucleus in the reproduction process of the cells of your body. These processes are suppressed.... And therefore by breathing your particles your immune system is dramatically suppressed"
The main effect theoretical mitochondrial suppression would have would be on the metabolic processes (e.g. respiration, energy conversion etc.), not fukking macrophage reproduction
This guy is a quack and can't be trusted. You talk about conspiracies but this guy can't get basic facts straight. No doubt this guy has an ulterior motive, you can see right through it.
Anyway @thekingsmen, this is probably the last time I'm replying to you about this topic and probably most others. Waste of fukking time.
/end thread
So he researched the paper which took time instead of watching the video. He most likely didn't read the whole paper ( time consuming) but somehow this changes the testimonies.