Those stats are flawed because it does not measure pace, overall impact on the game, efficiency, level of competition, and what not. I can compare Wilt stats to MJ and make MJ look like some shyt.Has anyone brought in any numbers as to why one would be better than the other?!?
Because that seems like a logical starting off point, for some of you ignant ass nikkas:
Career stats:
MJ: 30.1 ppg, 6.2 rpg, 5.3 apg, 50% shooting, 33% three-point shooting. 6 championships, 5 MVPs, 10 scoring titles
LeBron: 27.6 ppg, 7.3 rpg, 6.9 apg, 49% shooting, 33% three-point shooting. 1 championship, 4 MVPs, 1 scoring title
Make your own conclusions using the figures above...
![]()

Da god wasn't lookin' and you know this. He ain't catch him slippin' again tho 


Breh, Jordans last year as a Bull and Bron's rookie season are only seperated by 5 years. If anything, the game has become much more lenient toward scorers, thus benefiting and inflating Bron's (and many others) numbers.
him 
flawed!!! dude those are cold hard stats. how are you going to measure impact of the game and level of competition??



