Posters w/a certain number of negs should get banned

[TLR Is Mental Poison]

Its not hard to stay in the green here. If you are deep in the red

Dropping below a certain number should be an automatic ban. Not even rep wars can get people down as low as I'm seeing some of the worst posters.

 

[ScoopNScore]

We had a thread on this before, n not many people were feeling the idea, but if the number was like -800 before someone gets banned, that would be pretty fair for everyone n more people would like it.

 

[TLR Is Mental Poison]

We had a thread on this before, n not many people were feeling the idea, but if the number was like -800 before someone gets banned, that would be pretty fair for everyone n more people would like it.

People not feeling it were prob deep in the red

 

[61 Corpses]

No.
It's not happening. If this happened all people would have to do is clique up and neg a certain poster until he gets banned status.
Rep is way too easily manipulated for all of that.

 

[cook]

Rep is not an accurate way to judge a poster despite it being correct in some cases

 

[TLR Is Mental Poison]

No.
It's not happening. If this happened all people would have to do is clique up and neg a certain poster until he gets banned status.
Rep is way too easily manipulated for all of that.

Do nikkas really have time for that

I feel like u cant neg someone more than once a week

Which means if someone is down at like -2000 they pretty much pissed off everyone on the board

I wish we could see a list of posters sorted by rep... all the posters deep in the red are people everyone else would want to

 

[Illeye buckmatic]

Do nikkas really have time for that

I feel like u cant neg someone more than once a week

Which means if someone is down at like -2000 they pretty much pissed off everyone on the board

I wish we could see a list of posters sorted by rep... all the posters deep in the red are people everyone else would want to

I kinda feel you on this particular post. Sometimes it takes me almost a month to rep certain posters
I guess I'll just start using my ten reps a day














































I've been saying that for months

 

[Bender Rodriguez]

Can they possibly be put on ballot and then a 2 to 3 vote being all the posters count as 1 votes and @cook and @Brooklynzson get the other 2 votes?

 

[Brooklynzson]

Can they possibly be put on ballot and then a 2 to 3 vote being all the posters count as 1 votes and @cook and @Brooklynzson get the other 2 votes?

Na, see below. Can always ban them yourself w/ that ignore button

No.
It's not happening. If this happened all people would have to do is clique up and neg a certain poster until he gets banned status.
Rep is way too easily manipulated for all of that.

Rep is not an accurate way to judge a poster despite it being correct in some cases

 

[TLR Is Mental Poison]

Na, see below. Can always ban them yourself w/ that ignore button

True true

 

[concise]

Do nikkas really have time for that

Yes.

 

[61 Corpses]

Do nikkas really have time for that

Yep...diss a certain basketball player and watch how low your rep drops

TSC cliqued up and negged @Wcthesecret to Bolivia within two days

If your idea became a rule...all it would take is for rep groups and a Coli lynch mob to get someone deep in the red within days to have them banned...It sets a bad precedent and also promotes cyber bullying

@cook and @Brooklynzson don't want any bad press on their hands friend

 

[TLR Is Mental Poison]

cyber bullying

Naw but you make a lot of good points... that ignore feature is a beautiful thing as well

Im just trying to discourage trolling

 

[Capo Dei Capi]

Yep...diss a certain basketball player and watch how low your rep drops

TSC cliqued up and negged @Wcthesecret to Bolivia within two days

If your idea became a rule...all it would take is for rep groups and a Coli lynch mob to get someone deep in the red within days to have them banned...It sets a bad precedent and also promotes cyber bullying

@cook and @Brooklynzson don't want any bad press on their hands friend

So you saying wcthesecret and anyone who hates on Kobe shouldn't be banned?

 

[61 Corpses]

So you saying wcthesecret and anyone who hates on Kobe shouldn't be banned?

I'm not saying anything friend, i'm just pointing examples of how OP's idea would set a bad precedent