Predatory behavior of women isn't discussed as much.

Unbothered

ELEVATING to HIGHER LEVELS with POSITIVE VIBES ✨
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
3,341
Reputation
935
Daps
8,565
Reppin
'Cuse, New York
Well, for one, as I've explained so many times on here is that...

It's not that people don't believe women aren't capable of being sexual predators towards young boys and men, but rather it's hard to legally prove due to numerous factors such as many instances stated below in my previous post in a thread with a similar context.

A man just out of the bloom saying that he was violated as a young boy by an older adult woman doesn't cut it, hypothetically, not that anyone's saying the man in such a scenario is a liar, but when serious claims are made proof has got to be established, assuming justice is desired.

It's hard to prove a woman has raped a boy because of the lack of physical evidence (penetration, fluids, etc) and the only other way would be that she sodomized him with an object, which is rare. See, when a little girl is raped, there's evidence due to the physical trauma (bruising, tears, etc.) to her vaginal area after she's been treated with a rape kit that proves she recently engaged in traumatic forcible sex; in other words, raped/sexually abused.

With a boy, you can't examine his penis to tell if he's been forcibly raped, unless there are bodily fluids/a woman's pubic hairs are present but even then it's hard to prove it's rape since he could've recently finished having sex casually, so the only way to prove a woman raped or sexually abused a boy would have to be her sodomizing him anally, with an object, or there's proof such as scares and bruises near his penis, and parts of his body that would suggest abuse, but not necessarily sexual abuse, rather child abuse.

That's why in regards to the law when a boy is raped by a man, it's easier to prove because of the physical trauma he has done to the boy's rectum area that suggests he's been raped/sexually abused.

It's not that people don't believe it; it's just hard to prove it because of the aforementioned; historically, women who have been found guilty of sexually abusing children, boys in particular, were usually tied to pedophile rings, child pornography, etc. Women go down for sexual abuse cases, but it's usually tied to something bigger, as mentioned above.
 

Piffery

All Star
Joined
Nov 17, 2013
Messages
1,499
Reputation
-1,340
Daps
2,695
This is a post I had in the thread on YG's song discussing his abuse suffered.

There's a big thread I want to make on the abuse of boys within rap and it's relevance to wider society (with receipts) but I have a hard time pulling it all together.

It's a shame that no journalist has tried to make an expose on this issue despite how blaring it is:

Well.

Black boys have the youngest sexual debut of any race in America and our primary abusers are older women and girls, but try and inform people of that and all you get is adherence to orthodoxy in response to credible stats, researchers, and sound reasoning.






Abuse isn't a game of one-upmanship across identities but the truth is that feminists frequently make broad statements about male sexual and physical victimhood without anything empirical backing.



No credible researcher into female sexual predators would agree enough research has been done to make the sort of broad statements about female pedophilia that you'll see.

Instead they'd detail the road blocks such research faces.



I.e Michelle Elliot of Kidscape, a former chair of the World Health Organization and a deeply credible woman, victim advocate, and non-"MRA" strawman.

She's been awarded by the Queen and written one of if not the seminal book on female sexual abuse of children; and her biggest opps were other feminists.







This isn't a new issue with black boys and men of men of any race, or women for that matter.

Just try bringing up the greater access Catholic nuns have to children and the litany of credible accusations of sexual abuse they've faced this past century, as if nuns aren't already culturally understood to (in part) he ruler welding warriors when it comes to trauma infliction.



Watch people downplay the efforts of survivors to get an inch of recognition nd the low/near null prosecution rates relative to the proven/credible accusations and what can be extrapolated from that.






When I looked into the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Canada on abuse in indigenous residential schools it was far from uncommon to see a single nun or multiple nuns with no priest involved in the molestation/rape of a child.



There are also a lot of myths about female sex offending that are still perpatrated; like women mostly offending as a lesser accomplice to a man rather than as primary actors.



That and more is cited here.






I don't know.



My reputation here speaks for itself on how much my takes and insistence at arguing with what I saw as misogyny, anti-white racism, anti-lgbt sentiments, or whatever else drove my participation and inspired dislike.



For whoever remembers my posting at all, that said, even way back when my views on male suffering/female abusers was never lockstep with the worst strawman of "woke feminist" thought so nothing I'm saying ATM is a pivot in thought application or fundemental beliefs.



I'm only saying the above to emphasize how that when in these progressive spaces or talking with feminists, no one has any charity offered to them if you in any way poke at their accepted truths, your past and present doesn't matter.



You're instantly cast as an uneducated or indoctrinated/at risk of falling down the "alt-right" pipeline man or pick-me, who's only agenda is to distract from female suffering rather than correct the claims that tacticly erase and cut off research into the abuse of boys, because it's inherent to them that boys don't suffer at a meaningful rate from anyone other than other men.



And I'm someone who spent my formative Internet years doing the exact opposite of what they claim I am, for people that have never sought as much perspective on the male experience as I have towards them (and that's in spite of the far more patriarchal/abusive women that raised and toxic peers that were around me) who basically just walk with the presumption of empathy.



It's all very doomer.



But everyone here should follow DrTJC as he's the premier researcher into this subject.



 

Vandelay

Life is absurd. Lean into it.
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
25,445
Reputation
7,049
Daps
91,631
Reppin
Phi Chi Connection
I was 12 and some of the moms in my neighborhood used to catcall me frequently...I was friends with their sons in some cases. I DID NOT even look 12 because I was short as shyt. Also 12, I remember these 2 ugly chicks used to chase me around the school and try grab my dikk, like no shame about the shyt in hallway no less. I was 17, and I remember one of my 30 year old coworkers talked about showing me the ropes because she liked my voice.

I'm not scarred or no shyt by none of this, but it definitely happens and isn't talked about nearly enough. And the thing I've learned is women are definitely freakier or more deviant than your average dude by a long shot.

There's a reason all these female teachers are fukking their students.

And that's just me. The amount of dudes i knew who lost their virginity at 8 years old is ridiculous.
 

ThrobbingHood

“I’m Sorry for 2025”
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Messages
34,020
Reputation
17,321
Daps
239,801
I swear I was literally just having this conversation a few hours ago. The amount of stories I and others have about women sexually assaulting us as young teenagers is crazy.

And yet it’s never taken seriously, especially by other women. But if a woman talks about the same scenario, they’re given sympathy. :yeshrug: :francis:
 

AAKing23

92' til Infinity....
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
42,604
Reputation
7,145
Daps
156,224
Reppin
NJ-PA
Women are financial and sexual predators but never receive flack on a collective scale because our patriarchal society doesn’t take them seriously as the dangerous threats that they are. That’s why they get lenient sentences and punishments. It’s also why child custody and divorce laws still haven’t changed
 

Hoodoo Child

The Urban Legend
Joined
Jul 22, 2017
Messages
22,668
Reputation
9,661
Daps
94,107
Reppin
The Crossroads
Well, for one, as I've explained so many times on here is that...

It's not that people don't believe women aren't capable of being sexual predators towards young boys and men, but rather it's hard to legally prove due to numerous factors such as many instances stated below in my previous post in a thread with a similar context.

A man just out of the bloom saying that he was violated as a young boy by an older adult woman doesn't cut it, hypothetically, not that anyone's saying the man in such a scenario is a liar, but when serious claims are made proof has got to be established, assuming justice is desired.
The bolded is bullshyt, because proof isn't necessarily needed when a young girl makes a accusation. A statement is considered evidence, and if that evidence is believed by a judge or jury, a conviction will ensue without any further physical/biological evidence being required.
 

Xyrax

Superstar
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
4,718
Reputation
2,224
Daps
26,691
As a black man, if you get sexually abused by another man. That's cause for ridicule. #terrycrews"why didn't you whoop his ass then?"
if you get sexually abused by a women, thats cause for being told to stfu. "tf are complaining about? Wish that was me" #Every thread in here about school teachers slamming ass with students.
Nobody cares about black men's mental health very much.
This.
 

bl2k8

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
29,407
Reputation
3,876
Daps
104,179
Reppin
Northern California
It’s only taken serious if it’s an age like 10 or below :francis: . Once them teen or even pre teen years hits most people assume they were fine with it
 
Top