PSA: Stop building up Resolutions/FPS as if they mean something and dry season/thirsty for next gen

N*E*R*D

In Search Of...
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
2,724
Reputation
915
Daps
5,553
Never in the history of gaming can I remember a time when people were so concerned with the technical aspect of gaming. Something that was really reserved for PC gamers has slithered its way into console gaming. The whole 900p/720p BS is just that BS. Those things really don't determine fun factor nor does it create great gaming experiences. What creates fun factor is the game actually being...well fun to play. Great gameplay, characters, story, are what really makes games fun to me.

Think back when you played certain games on arcade like Killer Instinct/ Street Fighter/ Mortal Kombat. When those games came to consoles we didn't complain @ all we were grateful because they were great games even downgraded as they were.

The whole thing about people being thirsty for games and its dry on next-gen consoles is BS too. They have only been out for 6 months and people expect there to be 10 AAA+ title at their fingertips. Expand your horizons and go check out some of these other games that you're too chicken shyt to take a chance on. Each console should be given at least 2 years and by then they should both contain at least 5 if not more must own games.

-End Rant-
 

Chill

carti stan
Supporter
Joined
Mar 25, 2013
Messages
8,277
Reputation
4,790
Daps
19,294
Reppin
San Junipero
I agree with you to an extent but back when Genesis and Super Nintendo was out they was arguing about 16-bit vs 32-bit and all that extra shyt.

Also we not expecting (at least I'm not) so many AAA titles in the next gen selection. But there could at least be something out for the next gen wave that makes you want to buy it. At least for xbox every game that comes out is out for 360 as well.
 

PS5 Pro

DC looking a 1/2 seed right about nuh
Joined
Feb 28, 2013
Messages
32,387
Reputation
-10,611
Daps
22,231
Reppin
The Original Rec Room Gang
I agree with you to an extent but back when Genesis and Super Nintendo was out they was arguing about 16-bit vs 32-bit and all that extra shyt.

Also we not expecting (at least I'm not) so many AAA titles in the next gen selection. But there could at least be something out for the next gen wave that makes you want to buy it. At least for xbox every game that comes out is out for 360 as well.
Bruh, nobody was "arguing" about 16bit vs 32bit. That don't even make sense :what:
So ppl was like "Yo, SNES looks better than N64 cuz"
If you seen a nikka say that, here, borrow my time machine, go back in time, and slap his mama :hula:

And while there will be titles that go to all systems, there are a lot of titles that are XB1 only
 

Chill

carti stan
Supporter
Joined
Mar 25, 2013
Messages
8,277
Reputation
4,790
Daps
19,294
Reppin
San Junipero
Bruh, nobody was "arguing" about 16bit vs 32bit. That don't even make sense :what:
So ppl was like "Yo, SNES looks better than N64 cuz"
If you seen a nikka say that, here, borrow my time machine, go back in time, and slap his mama :hula:

And while there will be titles that go to all systems, there are a lot of titles that are XB1 only

Wasn't that a majority of Sega's ad campaign was that it had better graphics than Nintendo 8-bit? "genesis does what nintendon't"?



"Genesis has blast processing while snes don't"?



I'm sure people gave a damn about that if they centered an ad campaign around it to attract people.

But the titles ain't shyt right now :why:, titanfall :flabbynsick:
 

T-K-G

Veteran
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
41,706
Reputation
7,008
Daps
124,722
Reppin
LWO/Starkset
Never in the history of gaming can I remember a time when people were so concerned with the technical aspect of gaming. Something that was really reserved for PC gamers has slithered its way into console gaming. The whole 900p/720p BS is just that BS. Those things really don't determine fun factor nor does it create great gaming experiences. What creates fun factor is the game actually being...well fun to play. Great gameplay, characters, story, are what really makes games fun to me.

Think back when you played certain games on arcade like Killer Instinct/ Street Fighter/ Mortal Kombat. When those games came to consoles we didn't complain @ all we were grateful because they were great games even downgraded as they were.

The whole thing about people being thirsty for games and its dry on next-gen consoles is BS too. They have only been out for 6 months and people expect there to be 10 AAA+ title at their fingertips. Expand your horizons and go check out some of these other games that you're too chicken shyt to take a chance on. Each console should be given at least 2 years and by then they should both contain at least 5 if not more must own games.

-End Rant-
people argue about shyt like that cuz majority of games that's droppin are either wack, have extremely short stories, or just dont have any type of replayability outside of online play

im with you breh, i honestly dont give a shyt about graphics/fps as long as the game is dope :yeshrug: last time i checked shyt like that is only supposed to matter to PC dudes and guys who play games on the professional/tournament level
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
36,250
Reputation
8,050
Daps
100,256
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
Never in the history of gaming can I remember a time when people were so concerned with the technical aspect of gaming. Something that was really reserved for PC gamers has slithered its way into console gaming. The whole 900p/720p BS is just that BS. Those things really don't determine fun factor nor does it create great gaming experiences. What creates fun factor is the game actually being...well fun to play. Great gameplay, characters, story, are what really makes games fun to me.

Think back when you played certain games on arcade like Killer Instinct/ Street Fighter/ Mortal Kombat. When those games came to consoles we didn't complain @ all we were grateful because they were great games even downgraded as they were.

The whole thing about people being thirsty for games and its dry on next-gen consoles is BS too. They have only been out for 6 months and people expect there to be 10 AAA+ title at their fingertips. Expand your horizons and go check out some of these other games that you're too chicken shyt to take a chance on. Each console should be given at least 2 years and by then they should both contain at least 5 if not more must own games.

-End Rant-
You'd be right except most arguments come against multiplats

So you have two identical games but it looks better on one system. You can't really argue anything else cause everything else is the same

Now if we gonna say game a is better than game b cause 1080p then you are dead right. But ps4 game a vs xb1 game a is gonna be the same in every category except looks
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
73,767
Reputation
4,259
Daps
116,792
Reppin
Tha Land
You'd be right except most arguments come against multiplats

So you have two identical games but it looks better on one system. You can't really argue anything else cause everything else is the same

Now if we gonna say game a is better than game b cause 1080p then you are dead right. But ps4 game a vs xb1 game a is gonna be the same in every category except looks

Nah doesn't matter if its multiplatvor not. The first question people are asking is what resolution/fps is it?

And even if it is multiplat, unless you have multiple systems the resolution/fps shouldn't really mater
 

PS5 Pro

DC looking a 1/2 seed right about nuh
Joined
Feb 28, 2013
Messages
32,387
Reputation
-10,611
Daps
22,231
Reppin
The Original Rec Room Gang
Wasn't that a majority of Sega's ad campaign was that it had better graphics than Nintendo 8-bit? "genesis does what nintendon't"?



"Genesis has blast processing while snes don't"?



I'm sure people gave a damn about that if they centered an ad campaign around it to attract people.

But the titles ain't shyt right now :why:, titanfall :flabbynsick:

That is a commercial bruh. The Genesis dropped a year before the SNES dropped
There wasn't a "debate" on which was better. Maybe you didn't know how these things started?
Sega had the 8bit Sega Master System which competed against but lost to the NES
th

Then just like how the Xbox 360 came out a year before the PS3 dropped, thats what happened with Genesis vs Nintendo

Are you gonna now say that people "debated" over if the 360 was more powerful than the PS2 :sas2:

You then going on about Blast Processing... that's not 16bit vs 8bit :ufdup:
And while all that is just marketing ploy's.. Nintendo then countered with the FX chip which is what gave us Star Fox

/Lesson over
 

Chill

carti stan
Supporter
Joined
Mar 25, 2013
Messages
8,277
Reputation
4,790
Daps
19,294
Reppin
San Junipero
That is a commercial bruh. The Genesis dropped a year before the SNES dropped
There wasn't a "debate" on which was better. Maybe you didn't know how these things started?
Sega had the 8bit Sega Master System which competed against but lost to the NES
th

Then just like how the Xbox 360 came out a year before the PS3 dropped, thats what happened with Genesis vs Nintendo

Are you gonna now say that people "debated" over if the 360 was more powerful than the PS2 :sas2:

You then going on about Blast Processing... that's not 16bit vs 8bit :ufdup:
And while all that is just marketing ploy's.. Nintendo then countered with the FX chip which is what gave us Star Fox

/Lesson over

That's still means that at one point in gaming history people cared about the hardware in their system :mindblown:

I never said people debated ps2 to xbox 360 :mindblown: people didn't care then

They still used blast processing as an angle to attract people into buying the genesis over the snes which had something to do with the hardware.

The whole point of commercials was to attract people into buying their console, if they felt focusing on how many bits it had to put it in a commercial just shows that people cared about that stuff back then, same goes for blast processing
 

PS5 Pro

DC looking a 1/2 seed right about nuh
Joined
Feb 28, 2013
Messages
32,387
Reputation
-10,611
Daps
22,231
Reppin
The Original Rec Room Gang
That's still means that at one point in gaming history people cared about the hardware in their system :mindblown:

I never said people debated ps2 to xbox 360 :mindblown: people didn't care then

They still used blast processing as an angle to attract people into buying the genesis over the snes which had something to do with the hardware.

The whole point of commercials was to attract people into buying their console, if they felt focusing on how many bits it had to put it in a commercial just shows that people cared about that stuff back then, same goes for blast processing
Thank you bruh for explaining that. But the whole :mindblown: comes from you moving goalpost cuz you can't admit you was wrong :snoop:

See bruh, the ONLY thing you said, and then I replied to was you saying people were debating 8bit vs 16bit
Nobody anywhere in any point of time was debating 8bit vs 16bit

You then countered with the Sega ad going Genesis does what Nintendon't, thinking because sega made that ad, that proves ppl debated 8bit vs 16bit :stop:

Now its clear that isn't the case. I point out how the 360 dropped a year before the PS3.. was ppl debating if next gen 360 was better than last gen ps2?
Of course not. Just like they wasn't debating if 8bit was better than 16bit

Everything else you talking about is 16bit vs 16bit, which everyone and there mama debated.. BACK THEN.
Some rode with Genesis, other with SNES. I had both, Genesis had sports and shumps on lock, nintendo had everything else.
/Lesson Over
 

Chill

carti stan
Supporter
Joined
Mar 25, 2013
Messages
8,277
Reputation
4,790
Daps
19,294
Reppin
San Junipero
Thank you bruh for explaining that. But the whole :mindblown: comes from you moving goalpost cuz you can't admit you was wrong :snoop:

See bruh, the ONLY thing you said, and then I replied to was you saying people were debating 8bit vs 16bit
Nobody anywhere in any point of time was debating 8bit vs 16bit

You then countered with the Sega ad going Genesis does what Nintendon't, thinking because sega made that ad, that proves ppl debated 8bit vs 16bit :stop:

Now its clear that isn't the case. I point out how the 360 dropped a year before the PS3.. was ppl debating if next gen 360 was better than last gen ps2?
Of course not. Just like they wasn't debating if 8bit was better than 16bit

Everything else you talking about is 16bit vs 16bit, which everyone and there mama debated.. BACK THEN.
Some rode with Genesis, other with SNES. I had both, Genesis had sports and shumps on lock, nintendo had everything else.
/Lesson Over

Okay, I understand where you're coming from. If me considering the blast processing argument as part of the whole point of people arguing about technical standpoints instead of the quality of games as moving goal posts then I guess I am wrong :yeshrug:.

My whole point with this was that this current gen was not the only time people cared about what was in their console more so than the games themselves. I brought up the blast processing because I feel it fits in that argument since sega used it to counter the fact it wasn't 32-bit.
 

PS5 Pro

DC looking a 1/2 seed right about nuh
Joined
Feb 28, 2013
Messages
32,387
Reputation
-10,611
Daps
22,231
Reppin
The Original Rec Room Gang
Okay, I understand where you're coming from. If me considering the blast processing argument as part of the whole point of people arguing about technical standpoints instead of the quality of games as moving goal posts then I guess I am wrong :yeshrug:.

My whole point with this was that this current gen was not the only time people cared about what was in their console more so than the games themselves. I brought up the blast processing because I feel it fits in that argument since sega used it to counter the fact it wasn't 32-bit.
It would, but that wasn't what I quoted YOU saying. I only was referring to 8bit vs 16bit
Everything else you saying, Yeah, 100% agree.

And even then, it wasn't something the gamer would talk about. It was the companies marketing
Now, they just flat out lie to the consumer and that consumer repeats the lie as fact

The Playstation 3 was always weaker than the Xbox 360, but sony said "You can't get TruHD without sony"
They made the claim back then, games would be 1080p
So the entire gen, the gamers, and even the gaming websites repeated the lie that the PS3 was more powerful
Now that we at the next gen, its established that the PS3 was weaker. But sony fanboys would never admit this until PS4 dropped. So yes, I'm very aware of what we talking about. Its reached unbelievable levels now
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
62,510
Reputation
8,270
Daps
114,512
Yo, were dudes really trying to downplay TR being 60fps on PS4 as opposed to 30fps on XB1?? I'm looking at my brother play TR on his PS4 and that shyt smooth as butter. The naysayers saying the game has frame drops must be exaggerating because it's been smooth as hell for hours.
 

Camile.Bidan

Banned
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
1,973
Reputation
-1,756
Daps
2,325
Frame rate and resolution matter to me. They enhance the gaming experience.

When I used to play on the PC with limited funds, I would sacrifice texture, Shading, Shadows, and Aliasing in order to have a 60 FPS and high resolution. I can't stand 30fps.

I am Xbot stan, but the low frame rate and low Resolutions issues have me not wanting to buy and Xbox and just passing on Console Gaming completely. Buying a Sony product is completely out of the question. Fukk Sony. I would rather die than spend one penny on their bullshyt products.
 
Top