Putin just unleashed his super secret weapon to beat Ukraine

romeodunn

Pro
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
332
Reputation
143
Daps
1,666
full


xqGW4Qo.jpg
Fuuuuuuuck I spat out my drink all over my keyboard :mjlol::russ:
 

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
42,283
Reputation
19,348
Daps
156,933
Reppin
Humanity
The 3 dynamics that have me pausing & thinking about the endgame are:

1. It's kind of a race to the bottom in terms of the Russian regime collapsing and Western instability caused by the aftershocks of inflation, particularly energy
2. This recently-introduced notion that the West may be running out of weapons to send Ukraine
3. The prospect of Putin's regime collapsing only for him to be replaced by someone who's even more of a hardliner

I actually think the mobilization accelerated #1. #2 I'm not sure about. And #3 is only really a concern due to nukes because Russia's forces are so depleted anyway.
1. If it's a race to the bottom then Putin showed up early and roided up because he is winning that race. The west has dealt with inflation before and is nowhere near as existential a threat as what Putin is doing.

2. Where are you picking up this Kremlin babble? I won't live to see the day that the U.S. can't arm several other nations to fight proxy wars around the world simultaneously. It's what the U.S. does.

3. Keeping Putin in power just because we don't know who is behind him is stupid. He needs to be taken out of the paint, off the court and escorted out of the stadium.
 

Reality

Make your own luck.
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Messages
7,189
Reputation
4,235
Daps
38,388
Reppin
NULL
1. If it's a race to the bottom then Putin showed up early and roided up because he is winning that race. The west has dealt with inflation before and is nowhere near as existential a threat as what Putin is doing.

2. Where are you picking up this Kremlin babble? I won't live to see the day that the U.S. can't arm several other nations to fight proxy wars around the world simultaneously. It's what the U.S. does.

3. Keeping Putin in power just because we don't know who is behind him is stupid. He needs to be taken out of the paint, off the court and escorted out of the stadium.

1. I agree. I think Putin/Russia are going to reach the bottom faster than the West, w/ mobilization bringing that on more quickly.

2. For the US, it's less about actually running out and more about reaching levels that create training and/or war-on-multiple-fronts challenges: Is the United States Running out of Weapons to Send to Ukraine?

3. Yeah, he's gotta get out the paint. I'm just saying what's the next move if he's replaced by someone who's more of a hardliner.
 

Spence

Superstar
Joined
Jul 14, 2015
Messages
18,770
Reputation
3,203
Daps
48,564
The mere notion of us running out of weapons to send :mjlol:
Even if we sent 20% of our supplies we actually manufacture the shyt as well and it’s not some rare earth resource or some shyt so we can restock on a massive scale if we ever needed to.
 

Savvir

Veteran
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
22,473
Reputation
4,036
Daps
115,815
i agree with your overall point but you quoted the result of russian air superiority/bombing runs in the modern era
That photo is from Chechnya… they never had a modern military… Russia had air superiority by default…
:comeon:
 
Top