Quote of the night

KnowledgeIsQueen

Duality Duel
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,428
Reputation
290
Daps
2,082
Reppin
Brooknam
6-7-2012

"In all ages the peoples of the world, equally with individuals, have accepted words for deeds, for they are content with a show and rarely pause to note, in the public arena, whether promises are followed by performance. Therefore we shall establish show institutions which will give eloquent proof of their benefit to progress.

We shall assume to ourselves the liberal physiognomy of all parties, of all directions, and we shall give that physiognomy a voice in orators who will speak so much that they will exhaust the patience of their hearers and produce an abhorrence or oratory.

In order to put public opinion in our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides to so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the goyim lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political, which it is not given to the public to understand, because they are understood only by him who guides the public. This is the first secret.

The second secret requisite for the success of our government is comprised in the following. To multiply to such an extent national failings, habits, passions, conditions of civil life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he is in the resulting chaos, so that the people in consequence will fail to understand one another. This measure will also serve us in another way, namely, to sow discord in all parties, to dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to submit to us, and to discourage any kind of personal initiative which might in any degree hinder our affair. There is nothing more dangerous than personal initiative; if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord. We must so direct the education of the goyim communities that whenever they come upon a matter requiring initiative they may drop their hands in despairing impotence. The strain which results from freedom of action saps the forces when it meets with the freedom of another. From this collision arise grave moral shocks, disenchantments, failures.

The word "freedom," which can be interpreted in various ways, is defined by us as follows:

Freedom is the right to do that which the law allows. This interpretation of the word will at the proper time be of service to us because all freedom will thus be in our hands, since the laws will abolish or create only that which is desirable for us according to the aforesaid program.

We shall deal with the press in the following way: What is the part played by the press to-day? It serves to excite and inflame those passions which are needed for our purpose or else it serves selfish ends of parties. It is often vapid, unjust, mendacious, and the majority of the public have not the slightest idea what ends the press really serves. We shall saddle and bridle it with a tight curb: we shall do the same also with all productions of the printing press, for where would be the sense of getting rid of the attacks of the press if we remain targets for pamphlets and books? The produce of publicity, which nowadays is a source of heavy expense owing to the necessity of censoring it, will be turned by us into a very lucrative source of income to our State: we shall lay on it a special stamp tax and require deposits of caution-money before permitting the establishment of any organ of the press or of printing offices; these will then have to guarantee our government against any kind of attack on the part of the press. For any attempt to attack us, if such still be possible, we shall inflict fines without mercy.

Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.

Literature and journalism are two of the most important educative forces, and therefore our government will become proprietor of the majority of the journals. This will neutralize the injurious influence of the privately owned press and will put us in possession of a tremendous influence upon the public mind... If we give permits for ten journals, we shall ourselves found thirty, and so on in the same proportion. This, however, must in nowise be suspected by the public. For which reason all journals published by us will be of the most opposite, in appearance, tendencies and opinions, thereby creating confidence in us and bringing over to us our quite unsuspicious opponents, who will thus fall into our trap and be rendered harmless.

All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions—aristocratic, republican, revolutionary, even anarchical—for so long, of course, as the constitution exists.... Like the Indian idol Vishnu they will have a hundred hands and every one of them will have a finger on any one of the public opinions as required. When a pulse quickens these hands will lead opinion in the direction of our aims, for an excited patient loses all power of judgment and easily yields to suggestion. Those fools who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will be repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for us. In the vain belief that they are following the organ of their party they will in fact follow the flag which we hang out for them."

Behold A Pale Horse

~*William Cooper

"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress"~*Mark Twain
 

havoc00

Pro
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Messages
18,824
Reputation
-188
Daps
1,128
biAFd.png
 

KnowledgeIsQueen

Duality Duel
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,428
Reputation
290
Daps
2,082
Reppin
Brooknam
"It is not what I am saying that is hurting you; it is that you have wounds that I touch by what I have said.

You are hurting yourself.....

There is no way that I can take this personally, because I know that you see the world with different eyes, with your eyes. You create an entire picture or movie in your mind, and in that picture you are the director, you are the producer, you are the main actor or actress. Everyone else is a secondary actor or actress. It is your movie.

The way you see that movie is according to the agreements that you made with life. Your point of view is something personal to you. It is no one’s truth but yours.

When you take things personally, then you feel offended, and your reaction is to defend your beliefs and create conflicts. You make something big out of something so little, because you have the need to be right and make everybody else wrong. You also try hard to be right by giving them your own opinions. In the same way, whatever you feel and do is just a projection of your own personal dream, a reflection of your own agreements. What you say, what you do, and the opinions you have are according to the agreements you have made.

Nothing other people do is because of you. It is because of themselves. All people live in their own dream, in their own mind; they are in a completely different world from the one we live in. When we take something personally, we make the assumption that they know what is in our world, and we try to impose our world on their world.

Others are going to have their own opinion according to their belief system, so nothing they think about me is really about me, but it is about them. Whatever you think, whatever you feel, I know is your problem. It is the way you see the world. It is nothing personal, because you are dealing with yourself, not with me.

You are never responsible for the actions of others; you are only responsible for you. When you truly understand this, and refuse to take things personally, you can hardly be hurt by the careless comments or actions of others."

The Four Agreements

~*Don Miguel Ruiz
 

KnowledgeIsQueen

Duality Duel
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,428
Reputation
290
Daps
2,082
Reppin
Brooknam
"Internal woman – External man"

Many relationships start off as booty calls. The man and woman willingly consent to having sex with no attachments. No one tricked or manipulated anyone into doing anything they didn’t want to do. Both parties agreed to just get their freak on every now and then. And many women are cool with this – at first.

Women are external creatures. The female sexual organ is on the inside of her body. Men are external creatures. And the male sexual organ is on the outside of his body. Women are more sexually intrigued by things they hear or feel, or things that touch them emotionally, such as a whispered sweet-nothings. Men are more sexually aroused by things they can physically see, such as a cute face, big breasts, or a nice booty.

When a man engages in sex, many times it’s just a physical form of recreation, and that’s it. It’s no different from playing football or throwing darts. It’s just a way to achieve an orgasm.

Men mostly don’t develop an emotional attachment through sexual intercourse. But for women it is inevitable that they’ll become emotionally attached to someone who is literally going up in her body. When a man is having sex with a woman, he has physical molecules, DNA, and other bodily fluids intertwining with hers. So he literally leaves a part of himself inside that woman.

It’s very difficult to detach yourself, emotionally, from a person who is physically going into your body (especially on a constant basis). This is why woman seem more emotional about relationships, especially ones that involve sex.

When a woman is having a casual sex relationship with a man over a period of time she will think the man is feeling the same way she is beginning to feel about the relationship. And because she is becoming more emotionally involved, she expects him to want to make a deeper commitment to the relationship……


But to the man, it’s still just sex.




Men aren’t good liars, they’re good actors

The reason why so many women tend to ignore the signs of a man’s true personality when they meet him is because they are too preoccupied with projecting their own expectations of what they want a man to be. Females will write their own chick flicks in their minds, and then go out looking for men to cast in their “movie”.

So instead of acknowledging these men for who they are, many women will try to find a way to work him into the script, and when it comes to getting some poon-tang, men are great actors. Notice I said that mean are great actors, not to be mistaken with being great liars. A liar generally makes up stuff on his own. But an actor recites the lines that are given to him. And women in this situation are feeding the men their lines to use for running game on them.

When a woman is out with a new man, and she says things like “The problem with my last boyfriend is that he never opened doors, or pulled out my chair for me,” the nonverbal message or “script” she is replaying to the new man is, “If you want to earn points with me, you need to open doors, and pull out my chair.”

And if the new man wants to win the "part" in the movie, he will act accordingly.

Men can only act or play the role for so long. Just like any actor, a man will play the role required of him very convincingly until he wins his Academy Award (which is, in most cases, some ass). After he wins his Oscar, he can get out of character, and go back to being himself.



Your mate doesn’t owe you the truth; you owe it to yourself to learn the truth.

One common reason why men cheat is that they encounter no negative repercussions. People will do what you allow them to do. And if a man sees that you are the type of woman who will look the other way when he is doing his dirt, he will push the envelope as far as he can.

We’ve all seen those lie detector shows on daytime TV where the man was caught cheating, and the woman stayed with him anyway. These men have no problem with being dishonest, because they know they can get away with it. And if a woman is at the point where she has to give her man lie detector tests, send private investigators to follow him, or snoop through his things because she doesn’t trust him, she should not be in a relationship with him.

Usually, when you suspect your mate is cheating on you, he is. A woman can have concrete evidence that her man is cheating, and she will still stick around, and say things like "Before I leave him, I need to confront him with evidence." Or "I need to bring closure to this situation.” What she is really saying is: "I’m going to give him an opportunity to tell me a better lie."

When women try to use rationalizations like "He owes me the truth," and "I deserve to know if he’s lying or not," they are simply not being realistic about how relationships work, and how life works.

In life and relationships, nobody owes you anything. And if you are in a relationship, and your mate is being dishonest, should he be more truthful? Yes. Should he be upfront about everything? Yes. But we don’t live in a world of what should be. We live in a worth that is.

In a relationship, there should be no infidelity. But unfortunately there often is. Your mate doesn’t owe you the truth; you owe it to yourself to learn the truth. And if you are in a relationship, and you know your man is cheating and you continue to allow him to tell you lie after lie and excuse after excuse, that’s your fault.

You owe it to yourself to deal with reality."

Play or be Played

~*Tariq Nasheed
 

KnowledgeIsQueen

Duality Duel
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,428
Reputation
290
Daps
2,082
Reppin
Brooknam
"In all things, uncertainty exists because of not knowing. Things stick in your mind because of being in doubt. When the principle is clarified, nothing sticks in your mind. This is called consummating knowledge and perfecting things. Since there is no longer anything sticking in your mind, all your tasks become easy to do.

For this reason, the practice of all the arts is for the purpose of clearing away what is on your mind. in the beginning, you do not know anything, so paradoxically you do not have any questions on your mind and you are obstructed by that. This makes everything difficult to do.

When what you have studied leaves your mind entirely, and practice also disappears, then, when you perform whatever art you are engaged in, you accomplish the techniques easily without being inhibited by concern over what you have learned, and yet without deviating from what you have learned. This is spontaneously confirming to learning without being consciously aware of doing so. The science of the art of war can be understood through this.

To learn all the sword strokes, the physical postures, the focus of the eyes, to thoroughly learn all there is to learn and practice it, is the spirit of consummating knowledge. Then, when you have succeeded in learning, when everything you have learned disappears from your conscious mind and you become innocent, this is the spirit of perfecting things.

When you have built up achievement in cultivation of learning and practice, even as your hands, feet, and body act, this does not hang on your mind. You are detached from your learning yet do not deviate from your learning. Whatever you do, your action is free.

At this time, you do not even know where your own mind is; neither the celestial devil nor outsiders can spy into your heart. The learning is for the purpose of reaching this state. Once you have learned this successfully, learning disappears."

The Book of Five Rings

~*Miyamoto Musashi
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
658
Reputation
63
Daps
1,560
Reppin
NULL
"It is not what I am saying that is hurting you; it is that you have wounds that I touch by what I have said.

You are hurting yourself.....

There is no way that I can take this personally, because I know that you see the world with different eyes, with your eyes. You create an entire picture or movie in your mind, and in that picture you are the director, you are the producer, you are the main actor or actress. Everyone else is a secondary actor or actress. It is your movie.

The way you see that movie is according to the agreements that you made with life. Your point of view is something personal to you. It is no one’s truth but yours.

When you take things personally, then you feel offended, and your reaction is to defend your beliefs and create conflicts. You make something big out of something so little, because you have the need to be right and make everybody else wrong. You also try hard to be right by giving them your own opinions. In the same way, whatever you feel and do is just a projection of your own personal dream, a reflection of your own agreements. What you say, what you do, and the opinions you have are according to the agreements you have made.

Nothing other people do is because of you. It is because of themselves. All people live in their own dream, in their own mind; they are in a completely different world from the one we live in. When we take something personally, we make the assumption that they know what is in our world, and we try to impose our world on their world.

Others are going to have their own opinion according to their belief system, so nothing they think about me is really about me, but it is about them. Whatever you think, whatever you feel, I know is your problem. It is the way you see the world. It is nothing personal, because you are dealing with yourself, not with me.

You are never responsible for the actions of others; you are only responsible for you. When you truly understand this, and refuse to take things personally, you can hardly be hurt by the careless comments or actions of others."

The Four Agreements

~*Don Miguel Ruiz

I have the audio book for this.For those of you that are interested in bettering yourself...Get This.It's definitely a mind changer.
 

KnowledgeIsQueen

Duality Duel
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,428
Reputation
290
Daps
2,082
Reppin
Brooknam
"Black Separatists - Who are they?

The simple truth is that the African people in the United States and throughout the world are not, and never have been, separatists in fact. Perhaps this has been their weakness. They have never really hated the whites, and they do not really hate whites now. What is taken for "hatred" when applied to Blacks, is their reaction against being hated, rejected and oppressed. And the thinking whites know this very well .

When they cry, "racism in reverse!" or "reverse discrimination" and "reverse segregation," they are saying, in effect "Only we whites may discriminate or segregate - but not you Blacks!" All-white organizations that exclude Blacks everywhere are normal and proper from the white perspective, but an all-Black organization excluding the whites? Perish the thought! Whites flee en masse from cities throughout the nation to avoid integrated schools and fair housing laws. These are the real separatists, not the Blacks who never fled from the whites at all. Yet those Blacks who said, "Let them go! Let us not pursue them. Let us stay where we are, stand on our own feet as men and women, and begin to build and improve our own schools and communities." These, not the whites, are denounced as "separatists" or "Black Nationalists."

The question which Blacks must answer and act on, or remain forever exactly where they are, is how can a minority group in a situation so distinctly different from that of any other minority group, successfully live and develop happily in an overwhelmingly white society? This is the question that faces us squarely in the critical times at the Crossroads. And the decision must be take as a race, and by the race, rather than by self-appointed leaders.

The term "crossroads" here must be taken more seriously than a mere metaphor. For a people may reach that intersection in life where the routes cross, leading in different directions. We only know the road over which we have come. So at the crossroads we must pause, uncertain. Which way now? Which way should we go? The numerous movements, led by charismatic leaders with catchy slogans to shout, are roads many will take. The biggest crowd-drawing route will always be baited with some kind of "religion", let by some prophet or mystic. For religion, any kind of religion, has been the means by which hope was maintained by a people without any basis for hope. And the search for real leaders has always been so desperate that the people flock to this or that promoter's movement, hoping that a true leader has been found at last.

The personal wealth amassed by these leaders is a matter of pride for many of their followers - to the poor and ignorant who are being fleeced, even the palatial mansion with colorfully uniformed servants reflect the power and glory of their leader. Criticism is silenced. For these leaders are shrewd, "natural" psychologists. They know exactly what appeals to the deprived masses, what will give them a feeling of being "somebody" and uplifted. Thousands will continue to be exploited by the smarter ones who know all the tricks that stir the emotion and emotions and empty pockets. And, apparently, these countless thousands of faithful followers like it. There are several big organizations, each concerned with different aspects of the racial situation, which carry on successful and much needed work on their respective fields. Some were on battlefront for the race when no one else was there. Without them, the situation of Blacks in America would be far worse than it is. If we henceforth advance at all, no matter in what direction or how different, it will be for the foundations the best of these organizations already laid.

How long the black race will stand at the crossroads, uncertain what to do, confused, and in fact actually afraid, how long, only future history will tell. But one thing is certain: There is a way out; there is an open, UNTRIED road. That untried road to actual unity and the actual improvement of the lives of the black masses everywhere is exactly what is proposed in these pages in clear, concrete, and specific terms."

The Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Race from 4500 B.C to 2000 A.D.

~*Chancellor Williams
 

KnowledgeIsQueen

Duality Duel
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,428
Reputation
290
Daps
2,082
Reppin
Brooknam
6-9-2012

Standing Alone

"In the life of blessedness self-reliance is of the utmost importance. If there is no peace there must be strength; if there is to be security there must be stability; if there is to be lasting joy there must be no leaning upon things which at any moment may be snatched away forever.

A man does not commence to truly live until he finds an immovable center within himself on which to stand, by which to regulate his life, and from which to draw his peace. If he trusts to that which fluctuates he also will fluctuate; if he leans upon that which may be withdrawn he will fall and be bruised; if he looks for satisfaction in perishable accumulations he will starve for happiness in the midst of plenty.

Let a man learn to stand alone, looking to no one for support; expecting no favors, craving no personal advantages; not begging, nor complaining, not craving, nor regretting, but relying upon the truth within himself, deriving his satisfaction and comfort from the integrity of his own heart.

If a man can find no peace within himself where shall he find it? If he dreads to be alone with himself what steadfastness shall he find in company? If he can find no joy in communion with his own thoughts how shall he escape misery in his contact with others? The man who has yet found nothing within himself upon which to stand will nowhere find a place of constant rest.

Men everywhere are deluded by the superstition that their happiness rests with other people and with outward things, and, as a result, they live in continual disappointments, regrets, and lamentations. The man who does not look for happiness to any others or to external things, but finds within himself its inexhaustible source, will be self-contained and serene under all circumstances, and will never become the helpless victim of misery and grief. The man who looks to others for support, who measures his happiness by the conduct of others and not by his own, who depends upon their co-operation for his peace of mind - such a man has no spiritual foothold, his mind is tossed hither and thither with the continual changes going on around him, and he lives in that ceaseless ebb and flow of the spirits which is wretchedness and unrest. He is a spiritual cripple, and has yet to learn how to maintain his mental center of gravity, and so go without the aid of crutches.

As a child learns to walk in order to go about from place to place of itself strong and unaided, so should a man learn to stand alone, to judge and think and act for himself, and to choose, in the strength of his own mind, the oath-way which he shall walk.

Without is change and decay and insecurity, within is all surety and blessedness. The soul is sufficient of itself. Where the need is there is the abundant supply. Your eternal dwelling-place is within; go there and take possession of your mansion; there you are a king, elsewhere you are a vassal. Be contended that others shall manage or mismanage their own little kingdom, and see to it that you reign strongly over your own. Your entire well-being and the well-being of the whole world lies there. You have a conscience, follow it; you have a mind, clarify it; you have a judgment, use and improve it; you have a will, employ and strengthen it; you have knowledge, increase it; there is a light within your soul, watch it, tend it, encourage it, shield it from the winds of passion, and help it to burn with a steadier and ever steadier radiance. Leave the world and come back to yourself. Think as a man, act as a man, live as a man. Be rich in yourself, be complete in yourself. Find the abiding center within you and obey it. The earth is maintaining its orbit by its obedience to its center the sun. Obey the center of light that is within you; let others call it darkness if they will. You are responsible for yourself, are accountable to yourself, therefore rely upon yourself. If you fear yourself who will place confidence in you? If you are untrue to yourself where shall you find the sweet satisfaction of Truth?

The great man stands alone in the simple dignity of independent manhood; he pursues his own path fearlessly, and does not apologize or "beg leave." Criticism and applause are no more to him than the dust upon his coat, of which he shakes himself free. He is not guided by the changing opinions of men but guides himself by the light of his own mind. Other men barter away their manhood for messes of flattery or fashion.

Until you can stand alone, looking for guidance neither to spirits nor mortals, gods nor men, but guiding yourself by the light of the truth within you, you are not unfettered and free, not altogether blessed. But do not mistake pride for self-reliance. To attempt to stand upon the crumbling foundation of pride is to be already fallen. No man depends upon others more than the proud man. He drinks in their approbation and resents their censure. He mistakes flattery for sound judgment, and is most easily hurt or pleased by the opinions of others. His happiness is entirely in the hands of others. But the self-reliant man stands, not upon personal pride, but on an abiding law, principle, ideal, reality within himself. Upon this he poises himself, refusing to be swept from his strong foothold either by the waves of passion within or the storms of opinion without, but should he at any time lose his balance he quickly regains himself, and is fully restored. His happiness is entirely in his own hands.

Find your center of balance and succeed in standing alone, and, whatever your work in life may be, you will succeed; you will accomplish what you set your mind upon , for the truly self-reliant man is the invincible man. But though you do not rely upon others, learn of them. Never cease to increase in knowledge, and be ever ready to receive that which is good and useful. You can not have too much humility; the most self-reliant men are the most humble. "No aristocrat, no prince born to the purple, can begin to compare with the self-respect of the saint. Why is he lowly, but that he knows that he can well afford it, resting on the largeness of God in him." Learn of all men, and especially of the masters of Truth, but do not lose your hold upon the truth that the ultimate guidance is in yourself. A master can say : "Here is the path," but he can neither compel you to walk it nor walk it for you. You must put forth your own efforts , must achieve by your own strength, must make his truth your truth by your own unaided exertions; you must implicitly trust yourself.

You are to be master of yourself, lord over yourself, not fawning and imitating, but doing your work as a living, vital portion of the universe; giving love but not expecting it; giving sympathy but not craving for it; giving aid but not depending upon it. If men should censure your work, heed them not. It suffices that your work be true: rest you in this sufficiency. Do not ask : "Will my work please?" but : "Is it real?" If your work be true the criticism of men cannot touch it; if it be false their disapproval will not slay it quicker than it will die of itself. The words and acts of Truth cannot pass away until their work is fully accomplished; the words and acts of error cannot remain, for they have no work to do. Criticism and resentment are alike superfluous.

Free yourself from the self-imposed tyranny of slavish dependence, and stand alone, not as an isolated unit, but as a sympathetic portion of the whole. Find the Joy that results from well -earned freedom, the peace that flows from wise self-possession, the blessedness that inheres in native strength."

Byways Of Blessedness

~*James Allen
 

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
40,937
Reputation
3,966
Daps
101,690
" Our contempt for "egoists" begins very early in life. Children who fulfill their parents' conscious or unconscious wishes are "good," but if they ever refuse to do so or express wishes of their own that go against those of their parents, they are called egoistic and inconsiderate. It usually does not occur to the parents that they might need and use the child to fulfill their own egoistic wishes. They often are convinced that they must teach their child how to behave because it is their duty to help him along on the road to socialization. If a child brought up this way does not wish to lose his parents' love (And what child can risk that?), he must learn very early to share, to give, to make sacrifices, and to be willing to "do without" and forgo gratification—long before he is capable of true sharing or of the real willingness to "do without."

A child who has been breast-fed for nine months and no longer wants to drink from the breast does not have to be taught to give it up. And a child who has been allowed to be egoistic, greedy, and asocial long enough will develop spontaneous pleasure in sharing and giving. But a child trained in accordance with his parents' needs may never experience this pleasure, even while he gives and shares in a dutiful and exemplary way, and suffers because others are not as "good" as he is. Adults who were so brought up will try to teach their children this same altruism as early as possible. With gifted children this is an easy task; but at what cost!

Taking a closer look, we no longer find the meaning of the word "egoism" so clear-cut and unequivocal. It will be much the same when we examine "respect for others," which is often said to be missing in self-centered people. If a mother respects both herself and her child from his very first day onward, she will never need to teach him respect for others. He will, of course, take both himself and others seriously—he couldn't do otherwise. But a mother who, as a child, was herself not taken seriously by her mother as the person she really was will crave this respect from her child as a substitute; and she will try to get it by training him to give it to her. The tragic fate that is the result of such training and such "respect" is described in this book.

As soon as we look more closely and examine their origins, we shall see that other moralizing, derogatory words also will lose their popular clear-cut character.

The usually accepted judgmental contrast between self-love and object-love, and their portrayal as opposites, springs from naive and uncritical usage in our everyday language. Yet, a little reflection soon shows how inconceivable it is really to love others (not merely to need them), if one cannot love oneself as one really is. And how could a person do that if, from the very beginning, he has had no chance to experience his true feelings and to learn to know himself?

For the majority of sensitive people, the true self remains deeply and thoroughly hidden. But how can you love something you do not know, something that has never been loved? So it is that many a gifted person lives without any notion of his or her true self. Such people are enamored of an idealized, conforming, false self. They will shun their hidden and lost true self, unless depression makes them aware of its loss or psychosis confronts them harshly with that true self, whom they now have to face and to whom they are delivered up, helplessly, as to a threatening stranger. "


Prisoners of Childhood

Alice Miller
 
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
16,276
Reputation
2,260
Daps
53,052
Reppin
Continental U.S.
You know damn well nikkas ain't gone read all that. Or to be more grammatically correct, we here at the coli have the attention span of a toddler, hence forth refuse to subjugate ourselves to the profundity of your quotes of wisdom.
 

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
40,937
Reputation
3,966
Daps
101,690
You know damn well nikkas ain't gone read all that. Or to be more grammatically correct, we here at the coli have the attention span of a toddler, hence forth refuse to subjugate ourselves to the profundity of your quotes of wisdom.



:aicmon:
So skip it and move on the next thread, thanks.
 
Top