yeah it’s not looking like I assumed it was. I think I can admit I was wrong. It doesn’t seem like none of this will stick.
a 3 min video from a conspiracy YouTuber made in windows media maker swayed you? You were already riding for Kelly before that.. Did you even look at the rest of those videos the guy who posting probably made himself? Especially the last one he posted. A picture out of context with text and conjecture...Or even funnier the Tasha k one. Believe r Kelly stanleys brehsyeah it’s not looking like I assumed it was. I think I can admit I was wrong. It doesn’t seem like none of this will stick.
a 3 min video from a conspiracy YouTuber made in windows media maker swayed you? You were already riding for Kelly before that.. Did you even look at the rest of those videos the guy who posting probably made himself? Especially the last one he posted. A picture out of context with text and conjecture...Or even funnier the Tasha k one. Believe r Kelly stanleys brehs
yea which is the whole point of the trial. nobody knows shyt me you or some random nobody youtubers who use windows movie maker to make bullshyt videos with shyt people made up.We will see when the jury comes to a decision. You chose what to believe but I’m almost certain the facts are in the middle somewhere.
yea which is the whole point of the trial. nobody knows shyt me you or some random nobody youtubers who use windows movie maker to make bullshyt videos with shyt people made up.
The person in that video is splitting hairs at the tiniest shyt to make it seem like rkelly is being railroaded. they took a quote a witness said and said rkelly himself never ever said that even going as far to say even headlines said he said it... even tho witnesses said he did. even in the video when she shows three headline that said rkelly himself said that...none of them are phrased that way its clearly a quote from the witness and even shows her name in one headlines. They took a misquote from a youtube video channel I, YOU or anybody else ever heard from called law and crime daily and ran with that shyt. These are the kind of people posting shyt in his defense. Im not saying no witnesses arent lying im saying dont believe these grifters trying to make money over night with these bullshyt videosOne of the guys is actually at the trial reporting it and has been there the whole time. I can admit that if I owned a large media company I also wouldn’t advertise if the case wasn’t going well for the prosecution also. Just imagine the hate mail and issues a news network would run into if they discussed how upon cross examination it was determined that a person lied or that they were just jealous or they were trying to get money.
it’s as if they are only releasing one side of the case. Maybe I’m a conspiracy theorist also I guess.
The person in that video is splitting hairs at the tiniest shyt to make it seem like rkelly is being railroaded. they took a quote a witness said and said rkelly himself never ever said that even going as far to say even headlines said he said it... even tho witnesses said he did. even in the video when she shows three headline that said rkelly himself said that...none of them are phrased that way it clearly is a quote from the witness and even shows her name in one headline They took a misquote from a youtube video channel I, YOU or anybody else ever heard from called law and crime daily and ran with that shyt. these are the kind of people posting shyt in his defense. Im not saying no witnesses isnt lying im saying dont believe these griters trying to make money over night with these bullshyt videos
Hopefully they are better because that last one was transparent af using the fox news playbook . EDIT NVM its same youtube page.Yes but go back and look at some of the other videos and also some of the other people who are reporting on the case.
From who exactly? did you also hear from the same people he was about to buy nbc too thats why they lied about him marrying a 15 year old and fukking a 13 year old on tape?What I'm hearing is media ain't reporting the facts. But they gonna eat if he's found guilty but definitely will eat more if he's found not guilty with people thinking what media was telling them was true.![]()


post your source not from a youtube conspiracy page..From who exactly? did you also hear from the same people he was about to buy nbc too thats why they lied about him marrying a 15 year old and fukking a 13 year old on tape?post your source not from a youtube conspiracy page..
that's not what I asked you. Who told you the quote you heard. Where is your source?
This still doesn't show all the defense has done cross examining the witnesses.