Rape case against Trey Songz dropped

[8WON6]

Jane Doe Drops $20 Million Rape Lawsuit Against Trey Songz

Anonymous woman, who accused the singer of anally raping her at a 2016 party, requested that her suit be dismissed without prejudice

www.rollingstone.com

An unnamed woman who accused Trey Songs of raping her in a $20 million lawsuit earlier this year has had her case dismissed at her request.

In court documents obtained by Rolling Stone, Jane Doe asked a judge in late June for the case to be dismissed without prejudice. On Wednesday, July 6, the judge overseeing the case granted the request.

No other details were given, like whether Songz — real name Tremaine Neverson — reached a settlement with Doe. Doe’s lawyer, George Vrabeck, did not immediately return Rolling Stone’s request for comment, nor did a rep for Neverson.

Doe sued Neverson back in February, claiming that he anally raped her at a party in March 2016. In the suit, the woman claimed Neverson threw her to the ground, tore her clothes off, and raped her, even as she repeatedly told him, “No,” and “begged” him to stop. Doe says after the alleged incident, she left the party and had an Uber driver take her to a nearby hospital, where doctors told her she had “severe anal tearing that could require surgery.”





In her filing, Doe noted that she did have a casual and “occasionally sexual” relationship with Neverson prior to the alleged attack. She also said she did not initially identify him as her attacker to the police because she was “fearing for her life.” She went on to claim that, since the alleged attack, she had suffered from “fear, anxiety, humiliation, depression, and other physical and emotional injuries, and damages.”

Doe is one of four women who have accused Neverson of sexual assault or harassment; Neverson has denied the allegations against him. Most recently, in April, a woman named Megan Johnson demanded a $5 million settlement related to an incident where Neverson allegedly pulled down her bathing suit top, exposing her breast, at a party (TMZ obtained footage of the incident). In January, former college basketball player Dylan Gonzalez accused Neverson of raping her nine years ago; an investigation into Gonzalez’s claims wrapped in April, with police deciding not to press charges unless new evidence emerges. And in December 2021, Jauhara Jeffries refiled a lawsuit in Miami, claiming Neverson assaulted her at a nightclub at a New Year’s party in 2018.

 

[Geek Nasty]

No more hiding names of accusers

 

[Max Power]

This is why the conviction rates for this particular crime are so low, the majority of these harlots are lying. It dawns on them that upon closer scrutiny from a lawyer, a judge and a jury their ducktales would be ripped to shreds.

 

[Unknown Poster]

If I'm correct this is the 2nd person that dropped a lawsuit against Trey songz for sexual deviancy.

which makes me think that people are trying to take him down.

 

[Doobie Doo]

eeeeehhhhhYUUUHHH!

 

[Thavoiceofthevoiceless]

People obviously don't understand what the term "without prejudice" means legally. It doesn't mean that he completely beat the case considering that it can be reopened at any point and time.

 

[Kiyoshi-Dono]

“It's a lot of real G's doing time
Cause a groupy bit the truth and told a lie”

 

[Neo. The Only. The One.]

2nd case against him to be thrown out but watch these damn simps still talk about "bu bu bu where there's smoke there must be fire"

 

[CopiousX]

If I'm correct this is the 2nd person that dropped a lawsuit against Trey songz for sexual deviancy.

which makes me think that people are trying to take him down.

If he is smart, he will take the hint and pack his bags for Bali like Russell Simmons.


These things will keep popping up until he in a cell like cosby. Im sure there is a lawyer somewhere out there thats calling every woman he's known from last year back until middle school, trying to build a case.



All i can say is that I hear cuba is nice this time of year.

 

[Neo. The Only. The One.]

People obviously don't understand what the term "without prejudice" means legally. It doesn't mean that he completely beat the case considering that it can be reopened at any point and time.

But that doesn't mean he's guilty. I see that you're still trying to cast doubt upon the man's innocence but check this out. If they had proof, the case wouldn't have gotten dismissed at all.

 

[Thavoiceofthevoiceless]

But that doesn't mean he's guilty. I see that you're still trying to cast doubt upon the man's innocence but check this out. If they had proof, the case wouldn't have gotten dismissed at all.

Where in my comment did cast doubt or insinuate that he's guilty? Cases get dismissed all the time to get brought back up if/when more proof and evidence comes into light hence the term "without prejudice". Don't make more out of my comment than it was.

 

[Neo. The Only. The One.]

Where in my comment did cast doubt or insinuate that he's guilty? Cases get dismissed all the time to get brought back up if/when more proof and evidence comes into light hence the term "without prejudice". Don't make more out of my comment than it was.

But cases also get dismissed all of the time without prejudice and are never brought back up again. Stop making more out of what the judge said than it actually was.

 

[Thavoiceofthevoiceless]

But cases also get dismissed all of the time without prejudice and are never brought back up again. Stop making more out of what the judge said than it actually was.

Just because they never get brought back up again doesn't mean that they won't ever be refiled again hence the legal term "without prejudice". You're bytching over nothing when the term "without prejudice" obviously means what it means. Again no where in my comment did I insinuate that he was guilty in the slightest.

 

[Wildhundreds]

Just because they never get brought back up again doesn't mean that they won't ever be refiled again hence the legal term "without prejudice". You're bytching over nothing when the term "without prejudice" obviously means what it means. Again no where in my comment did I insinuate that he was guilty in the slightest.

By definition it means he's not out of the woods. So with that in mind, he needs to clean up his act so he won't end up like R Kelly.

 

[Lurkio]

Which one?