Real Lion vs Tiger footage [TIGER IS KING BY FAR]

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
73,180
Reputation
14,789
Daps
309,279
Reppin
Toronto
tiger isn't king

lions have won majority of lion vs tiger face offs historically. they used to pit them against each other in the roman days

we did a whole extensive thread on this years ago with historical archival info from every documented face off and the tally wasn't close

edit and after watching OP video it was a bunch of ties:skip: "every lion got hoed". :duck:
 

CP3.

Mr Solo Dolo
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
6,010
Reputation
1,181
Daps
24,667
tiger isn't king

lions have won majority of lion vs tiger face offs historically. they used to pit them against each other in the roman days

we did a whole extensive thread on this years ago with historical archival info from every documented face off and the tally wasn't close

Huh? Tigers SMOKE lions. They're too big and powerful.

Now Tiger v Polar Bear might be a lil more interesting :patrice:
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
73,180
Reputation
14,789
Daps
309,279
Reppin
Toronto
link thread

:feedme:
@LiveFromLondon
@Akan
@Scott Larock
@Ms.CuriousCat
@Bonk
@Zyne
@Miggs
@Hennessypapi
@KodeBlue
@The Wave
@gabbo
@Mastamind
@aXiom
@staticshock

Barbary Lion vs Siberian Tiger

Thread is quite extensive so I will link whatever relevant posts I can

This post deals with the supposed weight and size advantage of Tigers
Barbary Lion vs Siberian Tiger

On this link you will find extensively recorded historical fights between the two Felines. The fights go both ways
Tiger vs Lion Documented Fights | . Informed . Opinions .

Clyde works with both Cats extensively and these are his results from when those animals clash
Barbary Lion vs Siberian Tiger
866c43dcc4994415a8e1008c1e25baa7.png

e3b5b711551147ed8b0cdf4f3148430f_r.jpg

clyde-beatty-in-the-lost-jungle-(1934)-large-picture.jpg

Clyde beatty stated in his 40 years working with them, he has handled 2,000 lions and tigers, with an act of 40 at a time. At that amount one must ask, how didnt the lions and tigers kill each other? In a 1951 news report, Clyde beatty stated he did lose some of the animals over the coarse of his career...50 tigers were killed by lions:Jungle Cats' Clash Not In Act -

Why didnt that guy named...Rajah...a usual tigers name lol...mention any of beattys casualty's that Clyde mentions in all three of his books, The big cage, Jungle performers and Facing the big cats:

1928 Lion named Prince killed a tigress trudy saving beattys life
1929 Lion named Nero Killed a tiger named Pasha saving his life
1930 A gang fight erupted in the result of 3 tigers killed by lions
1931 A Lion named duke and a lioness killed a tigress Snip and a tiger
1932 A lion named sammy killed a lioness
1933 A lion named Sultan killed a tiger name Tommy
1933 A lion named Caesar killed a tiger named Bobby
1933 A fight staged for the film big cage, a lion killed a tiger
1933 Two more tigers were killed in gang fights
1934 Accidental fights in performances were used for the lost jungle, a tigress nelly was killed by a lion
1934 The same lion Caesar killed two tigers and was taken out of the act
1935 Lion named detroit kills 3 tigresses, Alice, empress and slilka
1936 Beatty mentions in his long career he has 25 tigers killed by lions accidentally
1936 A lion named Boss tweeds fought and killed 3 bengal tigers at once
1936 Clyde mentions a lion killed a tiger named Poona
1937 Clydes wife Harriet witnesses a lion kill a tiger in his act.
1938 A lion named Memphis kills a tigress named Sehka
1947 Two lions Tarzan and Henry kills a tiger named Toona
1951 Another lion named prince, killed 3 tigresses and two tigers, Rosie, slieka 2, and sheba
1951 Clyde states 50 tigers were killed by lions in his 40 year career so far
1953 Two lions kill a bengal tiger in beattys act
1954 A lion named France killed two tigers
1957 His third lion named Caesar kills 2 tigers

Here you have historical art from many places depicting the same thing over and over again. The lions dominance over the tiger. They talk about how most people that cite tigers winning over Lions historically have no proof. Poets, Mosaic arts and artifacts say otherwise...
Barbary Lion vs Siberian Tiger
2327160149_b2c00365d3.jpg

Screenshot_90.png

Prato_claustre_1.jpg

00956792clip.jpg

IMG_0055_zpsgnoh0asp.jpg~original


This post right here will hurt tiger gang
Barbary Lion vs Siberian Tiger
or
Barbary Lion vs Siberian Tiger

John C. Merriam

The asiatic lion was known to kill the siberian tiger when they roamed farther north of india:
http://www.e-reading.club/illustrations/1028/1028618-img_7.png

Here is a zoologists take on this
Barbary Lion vs Siberian Tiger
David salmoni


He's a zoologist, a renowned animal trainer, a television presenter and a producer with his own South Africa-based production company, his love for animals. In 1998, Salmoni began his apprenticeship as an animal trainer at Bowmanville Zoological Park near Toronto, one of the world's largest humane-credited providers of highly trained animals. Salmoni focused on large cat training and has been training large cats as well as other predators since then.Salmoni was offered a life-changing opportunity to be the first to travel with two captive-bred Bengal tigers to Africa and train them how to hunt and survive in the wild. Following this experience, Salmoni lived among African lions for three months in an attempt to show that lions and humans can co exsist in the same area.

David salmoni says:

He’d give the edge to a lion in a fight with a tiger, even with a 150 lb advantage.


“To get a tiger to want to fight you is pretty hard,” says Salmoni. “Tigers don’t like to fight. They hunt to kill and eat. That’s it.” Unlike lions, which grow up in groups and are used to sparring, tigers are solitary animals, responsible for their own food and survival, Salmoni says. They will take the risk to fight only “if they feel they have to.

http://animal.discovery.com/tv/af...ck/dave-salmoni/dave-salmoni.html

So its not as if there were brain dead people who put it together, there were people with P.hd's on board...so I dont know where all these commentators go an criticize the team who havent an ounce of studying them or any history of working with either or even seeing a wild tiger and lion. As for the comments, I still dont understand the notion that the tiger is a lone hunter thus more experience, on basic logic this makes no sense. All this goes back to the notion that tigers...are suppose to be bigger.


Another Trainers Account
Barbary Lion vs Siberian Tiger

Bert Nelson
Nelson Also Discredits Belief That Tigers Can Vanquish Lords Of Jungle
for their little while in the rings and the arena....You never know when one of these babies will go crazy on your hands," said Mr. Nelson. Tigers easier to train, too, he said. Lions Always Beat Tigers "I've seen lots of gang fights between lions and tigers-- we had a me this spring when we opened in Chicago," he asserted...The tiger always attacks the lion by rolling over on his back and going for the throat When he goes for the throat he runs into a mane two or three inches thick and the same mane extends all down ie underside of the lion's body.
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
28,042
Reputation
4,853
Daps
104,445
tiger isn't king

lions have won majority of lion vs tiger face offs historically. they used to pit them against each other in the roman days

we did a whole extensive thread on this years ago with historical archival info from every documented face off and the tally wasn't close

edit and after watching OP video it was a bunch of ties:skip: "every lion got hoed". :duck:

Video ain’t even a bunch of ties…it’s a bunch of edited snippets; absolutely no conclusions can be drawn from that pointless video
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
73,180
Reputation
14,789
Daps
309,279
Reppin
Toronto
Video ain’t even a bunch of ties…it’s a bunch of edited snippets; absolutely no conclusions can be drawn from that pointless video
that's what i mean.

.

the Romans it seems had a penchant for these deadly duels evidence from historical texts and translations reveal that in these battles. the lion often emerged Victorious One account even tells of a lion that stood fiercely over its prey a tiger after a fierce struggle.

Every few years cat set members start set tripping and I gotta remind y'all who's the king.
 

Cuban Pete

Aka 305DeadCounty
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,091
Reputation
8,288
Daps
70,939
Reppin
SOHH ICEY MONOPOLY
Bengal and Siberian Tigers >>> African Lions, but Lions are >>> than all Other Tiger subspecies like the Sumatran, Chinese, Caspian Tiger. Alot of the fights that had lions winning were against smaller subspecies like the Sumatran and Chinese tigers.

The biggest and most powerful cats of all time were North American Lions, fukkers would be like 13 to 15 feet long and stand 5 feet at the shoulder or some crazy shyt like that :damn:

They fight differently also, tigers have a habit of standing on both legs and doing very fast consecutive swipes with a bite thrown in, and whoever falls they go to the ground.

Lions balance on one leg more than the other and cock back and HAYMAKER the fukk out of each other, and then go for the throat.

So if the Lion doesnt get one off quick, the tigers usually "win" but the tigers swipes dont hurt as much as one of the Mike Tyson lion slaps because lions have manes.

Tiger is Tyson Fury, Lion is Deontay Wilder basically.
 
Last edited:

BaggerofTea

dapcity.com
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
53,605
Reputation
-870
Daps
262,710
its fukked up to caging lions and tigers together like that.

both territorial af and will not back down easily.

But yea, tigers are solo kings. Spend most of their adult life in solitude
 
Last edited:
Top