Report: NCAA rules Homeless CFB player ineligible for accepting place to live / NCAA refutes it.

FloorGeneral

I don't even know anymore...
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,614
Reputation
2,685
Daps
22,718
Reppin
Packerland
Edit: NCAA denying they ruled him ineligible through tweet:


http://www.sbnation.com/college-foo...silas-nacita-baylor-football-ncaa-eligibility

Baylor fans woke up Wednesday to find star defensive end Shawn Oakman upset with the NCAA for an alleged wronging of one of his teammates. The first-team All-Big 12 player took to Twitter to express frustration.





A bit more clarity came from ESPN's David Smoak -- the player in question appears to be walk-on running back Silas Nacita, nicknamed "Salsa Nacho" after an autocorrect incident.





A Sports Illustrated profile by Ken Rodriguez during the season told Nacita's story. Despite living on couches as a senior at Bakersfield High School, he earned a 4.1 GPA and went on to play football at Cornell. The running back had tried to enroll at Baylor in summer 2013, but was refused admittance when he was unable to get a loan. He enrolled at McLennan Community College instead, waiting tables and saving up his money.

Nacita walked on at Baylor in June, homeless and hungry, sleeping on friends' floors and taking pictures of book pages from the campus store to study on his phone. He still made Academic All-Big 12. As a sophomore last season, Nacita ran 31 times for 191 yards with three touchdowns and also recorded nine tackles.



^^^Click that for Nacita's statement. There's 2 parts.^^^


Because he was a walk-on and not a scholarship player, room and board wasn't one of his benefits for being on the team. Our Daily Bears notes the irony:

I'm not sure what the NCAA expects athletes to do in this situation, where they don't have an athletic scholarship but are working hard to get one, beyond just not being athletes in the first place. If he was a regular student, nobody would care where he slept or if he paid for it. But because he's a football player and not on scholarship, he's held to a higher standard? Unless it's the school paying for it surreptitiously in an effort to skirt the NCAA's scholarship limits, why do they even care?

How NCAA rules should impact homeless players has become more and more of an issue in recent years.

A few more tweets:


 
Last edited:

big bun

Veteran
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
22,088
Reputation
1,025
Daps
68,333
Reppin
NULL
I'm thinking there's more to the story than what has been made public. NCAA does permit a prospective student-athlete and student-athlete to receive benefits from someone other than family members or legal guardians if a relationship has been established (along with other criteria). This would seem to fall in line with NCAA legislation, so I'm wondering what the deal is.
 
Top