Rich countries are reducing their emissions—by exporting them to China

ill

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
10,234
Reputation
407
Daps
17,297
Reppin
Mother Russia & Greater Israel
Rich countries are reducing their emissions—by exporting them to China

Interactive chart on the site if you're interested in seeing the movement of emissions over the years and how it ended up in poor, developing countries.



Historical greenhouse-gas emissions data make clear that much of the burden of climate change lies with rich countries. The US, the UK, Germany, and others built their economies burning fossil fuels without thinking about the consequences. The unwillingness of wealthy states to take historical responsibility for climate change is one reason it took more than 20 years of negotiations before 195 countries could agree to sign the 2015 Paris climate agreement.

One argument rich countries tend to make for not giving too many concessions to climate change mitigation: over the past two decades, the numbers show they’ve been reducing their emissions while poor countries are not. But behind those numbers lies an ugly truth.

Much of the emissions reductions in rich countries have happened simply because they’ve exported them to poor countries. When China produces phones, toys, or clothes, the resulting emissions get added to China’s account even if the product is consumed in the US, UK, or Germany.

We looked at fuel consumption data from the International Energy Agency, and used it to approximate each country’s industrial emissions. It tells a story of a changing global economy—and the shifting of the burden of greenhouse-gas emissions that helped that economy stay afloat.
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
26,276
Reputation
8,928
Daps
139,982
But at the same time, isn't China and other countries being more progressive to turn around their environmental impact by investing in alternative energies and the like at a faster rate than the US at the moment?

At some point China will reach a level where it will no longer rely on US production to be self sustaining. They will be where we are at and based on the above from an environmental impact they will be ahead of us in reducing it.

Anyways I think its unreasonable to expect developing countries (would China still fit this category..?) should be forced to adhere to policies that limit their ability to progress and grow to the level of other countries who already went through their industrial revolution and are currently in their post-industrial state. So you're saying I have to handicap my growth and not have a playing field that is equal to what allowed you to reach your currently level? Its bullshyt.
 
Top