I agree with the point you are making about how the interview went, but dawg stats were fake ASF though. I don't see how they would set up a debate with a known liar and not have a fact checker on deckYea I watched the first 10 mins, sat back down and watched the rest. Frankly nobody on there, was booksmart/educated enough to pushback on his talking points. Definitely needed an educated Umar type brotha up there. He was beating those clowns in the head with statistics (and was sharp, I'll give him that).
Once he came with stats, they needed to go deeper than the surface, instead of pointing their fingers at white ppl, and being unable to articulate their talking points. If you ask me, Elder smoked their boots.![]()
It's far from being dumb. Its intentional.How can you be so smart and dumb at the same time.
The Roman household was conceived of as an economic and juridical unit or estate: familia originally meant the group of the famuli (the servi, the slaves of a rural estate) living under the same roof. That meaning later expanded to indicate the familia as the basic Roman social unit, which might include the domus (house or home) but was legally distinct from it: a familia might own one or several homes. All members and properties of a familia were subject to the authority of a pater familias: his legal, social and religious position defined familia as a microcosm of the Roman state.[5] In Roman law, the potestas of the pater familias was official but distinct from that of magistrates.
Yep, giving these idiots a platform is the no.1 thing you should never do, even if you can shoot down their points.I came into this thread hoping to see a c00n get cooked and left being annoyed at how ill prepared they were and for giving him a platform![]()