Robin Thicke , T.I Sue Marvin Gaye's Family over "Blurred Lines"

Worl Boss 1Don

One Don if anno me ah Tesha Miller
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
1,959
Reputation
1,305
Daps
6,642


Thicke, Pharrell Williams and Clifford Harris, Jr. claim they were threatened by both Gaye's family and Funkadelic, each asserting that the summer hit wasn't original.


In order to shield "Blurred Lines," the hottest hit of the summer, RobinThicke, Pharrell Williams and Clifford Harris, Jr. are going to court.

A lawsuit was filed Thursday in California federal court by the trio against Marvin Gaye's family and Bridgeport Music, which owns some of Funkadelic's compositions. At issue are complaints about similarities between "Blurred Lines" and at least two songs.

According to the suit, a copy of which was obtained by The Hollywood Reporter, "Plaintiffs, who have the utmost respect for and admiration of Marvin Gaye, Funkadelic and their musical legacies, reluctantly file this action in the face of multiple adverse claims from alleged successors in interest to those artists. Defendants continue to insist that plaintiffs' massively successful composition, 'Blurred Lines,' copies 'their' compositions."

Read the lawsuit here.

The suit claims the Gaye family is alleging that "Blurred Lines" and Gaye's "Got to Give It Up" "feel" or "sound" the same, and that the "Gaye defendants are claiming ownership of an entire genre, as opposed to a specific work."

As for Funkadelic, there's said to be claimed similarity between Thicke's hit and Funakedlic's "Sexy Ways."

"But there are no similarities between plaintiffs' composition and those the claimants allege they own, other than commonplace musical elements," states the lawsuit. "Plaintiffs created a hit and did it without copying anyone else's composition."

A New York TImes critic has noted that "Blurred Lines" is "influenced heavily" by Gaye’s “Got to Give It Up,” but the lawsuit makes the point that "being reminiscent of a 'sound' is not copyright infringement. The intent in producing 'Blurred Lines' was to evoke an era."

The Gayes and Bridgeport are said to be threatening litigation should the plaintiffs not pay a monetary settlement. Rather than wait for such a lawsuit to proceed, the plaintiffs are going to court to determine the parties' respective rights and obligations.

In seeking a judgment, Thicke, Williams and Harris Jr. are not only looking for a declaration that their song doesn't violate the defendants' rights by copying their songs, but also that the "Gayes do not have an interest in the copyright to the composition 'Got To Give It Up' sufficient to confer standing on them to pursue claims of infringement of that composition."

The plaintiffs are represented by Howard King and Stephen Rothschild of King, Holmes, Paterno & Berliner.

THR has reached out to the defendants for comment and update with a response

 

okocharuud

<<<<<<OG Member >>>>>PS5- Pattricckk
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
955
Reputation
120
Daps
1,832
Reppin
:mjpls:
Kqjku5F.gif
 

AveRocca

Stars and Bars
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
1,156
Reputation
55
Daps
2,419
Reppin
D.C.
Marvin is my nikka and the GOAT in his field IMO, and Blurred Lines was clearly influenced by Got To Give it Up, but this lawsuit seems pretty frivolous to me. shyt isn't a carbon copy of the joint or anything like that, you would think to be able to claim that type of infringement it would have to be blatantly ripped or some shyt like that. Are there any attorneys on here that can explain the copyright infringement burden in a case like this?
 

NvrCMyNut

Banned
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
11,414
Reputation
-4,159
Daps
21,904
Reppin
NULL
Marvin is my nikka and the GOAT in his field IMO, and Blurred Lines was clearly influenced by Got To Give it Up, but this lawsuit seems pretty frivolous to me. shyt isn't a carbon copy of the joint or anything like that, you would think to be able to claim that type of infringement it would have to be blatantly ripped or some shyt like that. Are there any attorneys on here that can explain the copyright infringement burden in a case like this?
Ofcourse. Coli's Legal experts should be here shortly.
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,759
Reputation
9,572
Daps
105,075
Damn I guess Thick fuked up when he paid homage saying what he wuz influenced by:heh:...pay homage to legends and get sued brehs:laff:
 

AveRocca

Stars and Bars
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
1,156
Reputation
55
Daps
2,419
Reppin
D.C.
Ofcourse. Coli's Legal experts should be here shortly.

I saw a dude the other day claim to be a lawyer on here so I dont know. We might have an entertainment lawyer or two that posts on here, you never know.
 

Youngdev

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
11,910
Reputation
1,479
Daps
55,496
They struck first, I guess they felt like the gaye family was gonna sue them , so they said fukk it.

Don't see a problem here
 

Poh SIti Dawn

Staying Positive, Getting Better Everyday. Holler!
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
13,827
Reputation
-2,831
Daps
17,248
Reppin
NULL
The song is similar, but knowing pharrell I bet that he didn't even sample the song, he just built from scratch and if that's what he did then he shouldn't have to pay up.
 
Top