
he could have said it differently but he's right. I've brought this up in barber shops before in reference to Rakim being so many people's #1 vs Jay and I've been blasted for it.
The problem with people who think like Royce (which is most)...very surface thinkers, is they go no deeper than the surface. "Jay-Z has way more and way better flows and rhyme patterns and bars than Kane"....or a Rakim in your case.
Dont judge someone's skillset completely just off of what you're hearing...theres way more things to consider. Who did Kane have to study and learn from and steal from and trace over, etc... when he hit the scene in terms of a body of work in 87-88?? Now, who did Jay-Z have to study and learn from and steal from and trace over when he dropped in 96?? Keeping in mind that in that almost 10 year gap between the two, the talent/skill naturally evolved and got way more advanced (which happens in almost everything). All great rappers should be a more advanced version of the great rappers that predate them...especially when it's like a 5-10 year advancement between them.
Royce is actually completely dead wrong, the Rakims and Kanes and G Raps and them are more skilled, imo, because they had far far less source material and muses to draw from. And even the MC's that predate them, who had pretty much NOTHING to pattern their shyt after, deserve all the respect in the world. You cant expect a Nas or Jay-Z to hit the scene in the mid-90's rapping like "Rapper's Delight"...of course they're more advanced...because their influences were advanced...so to even compare them with their predecessors is extremely surface level thinking. It's like comparing the Compass inventor to the GPS inventor and trying to shyt on the Compass maker for not being as skilled as the GPS maker...he didnt have the tools/advancements/reference points, it's a dumb comparison.