Sam Bradford vs. Robert Griffin?

[godkiller]

This question was asked on a football forum I frequent. It's an interesting question so I'll ask it here:

Who do you think is the better QB and which QB would you rather have at this point of their careers?

 

[godkiller]

bump

 

[Professor K.]

Sam

 

[Originalman]

RG3.

 

[godkiller]

Sam

RG3.

Would you care to explain your choice?

 

[bnm8907]

Tough one. I think it depends who you are. I'm probabably a minority in that I still believe in Rg3. I feel like he has more upside. I also think Bradford's better than he's shown.

1. The problem with RG3 is his azz don't know when to slide. 2. He is still prolly 5-10 years to early. I believe the dual threat qb is the future whether the nfl likes it or not. There are just not enough prototype "prostyle" qbs being produced in college anymore. They are going to adapt to these types of players eventually if more than 7 teams in the league want to have a chance to win year in and year out.

But to answer the question for 95% of the league bradford is prolly more in line with how current coaches know how to use qb's. So I would go with bradford not because I necessarily feel he's better but because he would be used more effectively.​

 

[Codeine Bryant]

I'd kill myself if I was a Redskins or Eagles fan. HTH

 

[Deaf2twothirds]

Sam. RG3 couldn't read a pop warner defensive scheme

 

[gangreen]

Bradford and especially when chip is cooking up the offense for him:smugchip:

 

[mastermind]

Bradford

 

[Sterling Archer]

Sam Bradford.

 

[Tha Gawd Amen]

Tim Tebow

 

[JLova]

Bradford...mainly because he will be given more chances than RG3.

 

[feelosofer]

Sam Bradford has shown himself to be a very QB. When healthy he put up good number throwing to trash WRs and a nicked up O-Line. RG3 has yet to match his rookie year and one more bad hit and he could be Tavaris Jackson status.

 

[DaPresident]

Healthy Bradford...