Saying prosecutors should focus on Antifa, judge frees white supremacist.

Pull Up the Roots

I have a good time when I go out of my mind..
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
18,270
Reputation
5,554
Daps
75,927
Reppin
Detroit

In his sentencing memo Thursday, U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney made it clear why he was letting Tyler Laube off lightly.

It wasn’t just because of what Laube did or didn’t do – the defendant had already confessed to beating a journalist at a 2017 Southern California rally and pleaded guilty to violating riot laws as part of a white supremacist gang.

Laube deserved a light sentence, Carney said, because prosecutors should have focused on leftist groups.

In a 22-page memo, Carney repeatedly said prosecutors have “ignored” violence committed by Antifa and instead focused on targeting people like Laube – Trump supporters and members of the far right.


“Sentencing Mr. Laube to additional incarceration would only increase the disparity between his punishment and the lack of punishment (and prosecution) members of far-left groups who have committed the same violent conduct received,” Carney wrote. The sentence: time served, 35 days, rather than the six months prosecutors had sought.

The same day Laube received his sentence at the federal courthouse in Santa Ana, California, the largest-ever prosecution of members of Antifa in American history was going to trial just 89 miles away.

In San Diego, the last two defendants in the “San Diego 11” – members of Antifa charged with committing violence against Trump supporters in January 2021 – were sitting before a jury. Their nine co-defendants have already been sentenced, some of them to years in prison, for their crimes.

The two cases are not perfect parallels. Laube was charged and sentenced in federal court, while the two Antifa defendants in San Diego, Jeremy White and Brian Lightfoot, were charged by a local district attorney in state court. But both cases involve fights between the far left and the far right at protests. Both involve scraps caught on camera. Both cases focus not just on the violence but on the groups’ alleged organizing and planning before a melee.

The federal judge’s strong words – and clear political bent – are as unusual as they are uninformed, legal experts told USA TODAY.

“He’s really gone off the deep end,” said John Donohue, a professor at Stanford Law School.

Federal judges have a lot of leeway when it comes to sentencing criminals, Donohue said, and usually, they use that discretion with a lot of care and reasoning. He doubts Carney exercised such caution in the Laube case, especially given the high-profile Antifa trial in San Diego.

“It's very hard for me to believe he (Carney) really has any accurate sense about what the relative prosecutions are of people on the left and the right in these assault cases,” Donohue said. “That would take a much more sophisticated inquiry than some federal judge just opining off the top of his head.”

David LaBahn, president of the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, agreed.

“It’s very disappointing for the judge to second-guess the work of the U.S. Attorney’s office,” LaBahn said. “This sounds to be very political instead of the role of the judge – calling balls and strikes, justice, equality, fairness.”

Laube is one of four defendants in the long-running prosecution of members of the Rise Above Movement, a now-disbanded white supremacist “fight club” that would regularly show up at protests in California elsewhere and get into fights with leftists.

After the fights at the Huntington Beach rally in March 2017, the men were originally charged in 2018 with violating federal laws against rioting and conspiracy to riot. In the last six years, Carney has twice dismissed the charges against the accused white supremacists, one of whom, RAM’s accused leader Robert Rundo, was extradited from Romania last year to face the charges.


Rundo remains in custody as federal prosecutors appeal that dismissal. Laube agreed last year to plead guilty to a misdemeanor for the beating of the journalist.

Prosecutors had asked Carney to sentence Laube to at least six months in prison. Instead, he was sentenced to time served and will pay a $2,000 fine.
 

cobra

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 24, 2017
Messages
10,870
Reputation
-1,196
Daps
48,686
republicans have totally conquered the legislative branch just like dems did in the 60s and 70s
 

Worthless Loser

Blackpilled
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
16,021
Reputation
5,049
Daps
108,804
He was appointed by Bush in 2003. He's also racist trash.

Carney succeeded Virginia A. Phillips as Chief Judge of the Central District of California on June 1, 2020. However, he stepped down on June 26, 2020 in light of allegations that he had made racially insensitive comments regarding the Clerk of the Court, Kiry Gray, who is African American. Carney referred to Gray as "street smart" and telling her "it was not like I was the police officer standing on your neck". Carney apologized to Gray for the remark. He was succeeded as Chief Judge by Philip S. Gutierrez.


He is also retiring which is probably why he felt so emboldened to do this.
 

Fillerguy

Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
17,188
Reputation
3,850
Daps
70,467
Reppin
North Jersey
He was appointed by Bush in 2003. He's also racist trash.

Carney succeeded Virginia A. Phillips as Chief Judge of the Central District of California on June 1, 2020. However, he stepped down on June 26, 2020 in light of allegations that he had made racially insensitive comments regarding the Clerk of the Court, Kiry Gray, who is African American. Carney referred to Gray as "street smart" and telling her "it was not like I was the police officer standing on your neck". Carney apologized to Gray for the remark. He was succeeded as Chief Judge by Philip S. Gutierrez.


He is also retiring which is probably why he felt so emboldened to do this.
The equivalent of shytting in the toilet after being evicted
 
Top