Type Username Here
Not a new member
more importantly what if it's a racc00n? Car kills you for a fukin Racc00n?
have the car hit the breaks as best it can. Accidents happen now all the time.
I was literally reading through the thread and about to post this verbatim. Exactly my concern re: how it even distinguishes from animals that may have a similar build to a child ie: racc00n. To think the car could possibly end my life into a wall over that is unsettling.
I hear what you guys are saying but the thought experiment states that the computer/robot knows it's a child. Those are valid points but in this case the computer knows it's a child.
We are early on in the stages of machine learning, robot vision and artificial intelligence, but there are machines right now that can differentiate humans from other objects (just not very well).
The point is about deciding what you feel is ethical about the circumstances presented and why you feel that way. The author of the article states that it might be most ethical to have the machine default to the choice of the driver.

I think there would have to be some sort of benchmark setting for braking, even the best cars right now can only hit 0 from 60 mph in about 90 some odd feet, not that it would probably matter much in the listed scenario. 