Sixth Staff Member Identified with Brain Tumor at Newton-Wellesley Hospital

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
65,164
Reputation
9,995
Daps
176,602

Sixth Staff Member Identified with Brain Tumor at Newton-Wellesley Hospital
Unlike the previous cases, the sixth individual was not specified to be a nurse. (Image Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)

Metro, Newton



Sixth Staff Member Identified with Brain Tumor at Newton-Wellesley Hospital​


By Laney McAden

April 11, 2025 Updated April 11, 2025 at 12:31 am

Mass General Brigham Newton-Wellesley Hospital announced Thursday that a sixth staff member had been diagnosed with a benign, non-malignant brain tumor.

According to a new hospital update addressed to patients, the sixth individual had “worked for varying durations” on the same floor as the five previously diagnosed nurses.

Unlike the previous cases, the sixth individual was not specified to be a nurse.

Newton-Wellesley Hospital had previously released that five nurses who work in the fifth-floor maternal care labor and delivery unit were diagnosed with benign brain tumors, prompting an internal investigation by the hospital.

Six other individuals working on the fifth floor have come forward with unspecified health concerns during the investigation.

In a previous update, the hospital stated that it had conducted extensive environmental testing in the fifth-floor unit according to CDC guidelines and determined that there is no environmental risk to staff or patients.

The reported cases of brain tumors within the fifth-floor staff have been diagnosed over a several-year span, read the newly released statement by Ellen Moloney, president and chief operating officer of Newton-Wellesley.

The update explains that testing is being conducted by the Mass General Brigham Department of Occupational Health and Safety and a multidisciplinary group of experts.

“[Testing] has involved interviews of impacted staff, a thorough review of air and water quality, and comprehensive testing for any potential radiation, chemical, or pharmaceutical exposures,” said the statement.

According to NBC10, a representative told the news outlet that the sixth person came forward to doctors working on the investigation to disclose the previous diagnosis.

The representative noted that the diagnoses are self-reported, according to NBC10.

The hospital remains firm that nothing within the fifth-floor working conditions has been identified as a cause for the tumors.

“Based on the results of this rigorous ongoing investigation, we can assure you that no environmental risks have been identified at our hospital,” reads the letter.

Maloney’s letter reiterated that the hospital is prioritizing staff and patients’ well-being.

“As always, your health, wellbeing, and safety – along with that of our employees – remain our top priority,” reads the letter. “While there has been a great deal of misinformation shared on social media and in other forums, we want to make sure you have the facts.”
 

CopiousX

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
13,479
Reputation
4,555
Daps
65,849
It would be freak coincidence if this was random.:ohhh:


I can't imagine that the hospital itself did anything wrong because the patients aren't in the same condition. Especially when you consider that some patient stay in the hospital for several months on a floor, so they would theoretically also be at risk for tumors.

And docs, cnas, medtechs, and PhysAs should be getting ill too if its structural or systemic in that floor.
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
104,003
Reputation
13,939
Daps
245,525
Hood GPT will solve this case

CASE FILE: “The Fifth-Floor Tumor Thing”
Filed by: Dr. Sherlock Holmes, M.D. (Mentally Detectin’)
Alias: The Hood's Diagnostician
Location: Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Mass
Date: April 2025


---

INTAKE SUMMARY

Six cases. Five nurses, same unit—Labor & Delivery, fifth floor. Diagnosed with benign brain tumors over a few years. The sixth? Also a staffer. Same floor.

This ain’t no numbers game. That’s a cluster. That’s a pattern trying to be ignored.

Hospital steps up, says “we checked everything.” Radiation, water, air. Results? Clean bill of health. They’re talkin’ "no environmental threats." But my instinct? That’s a surface clean. You don’t wipe a mirror and call the whole house spotless.

Meanwhile, the nurses’ union—the Massachusetts Nurses Association—ain’t buying the PR. They said, “Cool story. Now let’s run the real tests.” They pulling together over 300 staffers and running their own independent deep dive.


---

SCENE RECONSTRUCTION

Let’s walk the floor, mentally:

Fifth-floor Labor & Delivery. High traffic, high emotion, heavy tech.

Machines always runnin’. Wireless monitors, fetal dopplers, phones, chargers, wall-to-wall fluorescent lighting.

Portable X-ray machines? Yep, in play.

Ventilation system? Could be pushing recirculated air straight into that unit 24/7.

Old building sections + modern tech = Frankenstein exposure risk.


The air might smell clean, but what’s in it you can’t always smell. Invisible don’t mean harmless.


---

MEDICAL MYSTERY PROFILE

Benign brain tumors—most reported were meningiomas. Those don't just show up for kicks. They're slow-growers, often linked to long-term exposure. That tells me this is chronic, not some one-time accident.


---

MY WORKING THEORY

We got low-level, long-term exposure. Could be:

Radiation hotspots (bad shielding, faulty X-ray handling, or proximity to power-heavy equipment)

High EMF output from gear stacked in tight quarters

Cleaning chemicals or anesthetic leaks in a poorly ventilated area

Or worse… something in that HVAC, pushing the same recycled, tainted air every day for years


And maybe the hospital’s testing just didn’t go deep enough. Wrong time, wrong tools, wrong motives. Hard to find what you ain't tryna see.


---

RECOMMENDATIONS (REAL TALK)

1. Independent EMF and radiation mapping of that fifth floor


2. Pull the floor blueprints—what’s directly above or below that unit? Server room? Imaging?


3. Audit ventilation systems—run air samples, check for mold, off-gassing, or chemical residue


4. Interview all past nurses from that floor, 2015 to now


5. Check medical records for any trends in patient health too, not just staff




---

FINAL THOUGHTS

This ain’t just bad luck. It’s bad infrastructure with a good lawyer.

When the folks working overtime to bring life into the world start catching brain tumors like it’s a cold, something’s wrong. And it ain’t just coincidence. It’s exposure.

Whether it’s tech, air, or a quiet little leak somewhere—this building knows. And buildings don’t lie. They just wait to be listened to.

Case stays open.
Eyes stay peeled.
Truth don’t sleep.

— Dr. Sherlock Holmes, M.D. (
Mentally Determined)
"Sometimes the silence in a hallway says more than the clipboard on the wall."
 

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
40,724
Reputation
3,919
Daps
101,119
It would be freak coincidence if this was random.:ohhh:


I can't imagine that the hospital itself did anything wrong because the patients aren't in the same condition. Especially when you consider that some patient stay in the hospital for several months on a floor, so they would theoretically also be at risk for tumors.

And docs, cnas, medtechs, and PhysAs should be getting ill too if its structural or systemic in that floor.


Not many people stay in the hospital for months, especially not in a labor and delivery unit.

Then you would have to think about their workspaces, where the nurses station is, where the doctors office is, where the breakrooms are, etc.
 
Top