AlwaysLurkin
Superstar
2010 cobalt ss 260 hp 0-60 5.5 seconds.shyt would catch a lot of people by surprise.
Sleepers you wouldn't mind owning
- Thread starter AlwaysLurkin
- Start date
Ricky Church
Stole Timberlake's Spaceship-Coupe
2003 SVT Focus
2003 Mercury Marauder
2014 Chevrolet SS
2003 Mercury Marauder
2014 Chevrolet SS
feelosofer
#ninergang
2015 Hyundai Azera
Ricky Church
Stole Timberlake's Spaceship-Coupe
that's a bad bytch.THIS. 6.2L MALIBU
INDEEDthat's a bad bytch.
Ugly ass Ford Taurus Sho
twin turbo v6 + a tune and cold air intake (not even expensive) = 0 to 60 in 4.3ish
It would blow the doors off of most things on the road.
It's big bodied.....but it looks like a family car all the way through.
I mean, it's so uglyy tho.
twin turbo v6 + a tune and cold air intake (not even expensive) = 0 to 60 in 4.3ish
It would blow the doors off of most things on the road.
It's big bodied.....but it looks like a family car all the way through.
I mean, it's so uglyy tho.
Old M5
BaldingSoHard
Veteran
Ugly ass Ford Taurus Sho
twin turbo v6 + a tune and cold air intake (not even expensive) = 0 to 60 in 4.3ish
It would blow the doors off of most things on the road.
It's big bodied.....but it looks like a family car all the way through.
I mean, it's so uglyy tho.
My neighbor has one in red (without the spoiler). He's got some different wheels on it and keeps it clean. It's actually better looking in person.
That maintenance is scary, but they are amazing.
It would have to have been babied with the original owners for me to be happy.
OR i'd have to make sure that engine and transmission was top notch before getting one. Those things can be money pits.
I've seen a few regular ones around, but I haven't seen the SHO in my area. They aren't that bad looking, I suppose.
I guess my problem with them is, they arn't aggressive looking enough....I mean, not even the slightest.
But I guess thats what makes it a sleeper, tho.
