She had a press conference about having evidence to free Torey, then just disappeared like that press conference never happened
So a congresswoman can really lie about having evidence thar can free someone for a high profile case and not face any consequences?
- Thread starter Standing on business
- Start date
DaddyFresh
Superstar
You must be new here lol
Bumblebreh
Collecting honey and money
She had a press conference about having evidence to free Torey, then just disappeared like that press conference never happened
1. She has no power or jurisdiction to free him.
2. It should have been his legal team that handles and submits the evidence to a judge. Press conference and social media posts mean nothing without a retrial.
3. An obvious performative stunt to gain more clout.
4. If Meg did not endorse Kamala, the republicans would not give two craps about mentioning Tory. If Tory was convicted with the same charges in a southern state, he would have got a much harsher sentence. Which is the irony.
5. And this is why public figures need to be careful because they can be sued or taken to court.
it's impressive how people keep hanging onto hope in this case.
It’s more embarrassing than it is impressive. Seeing nikkas have hope after that lady spoke on shyt that was already knowing was wild.
Lefty Gunz
Superstar
Republican grifter <<<<
She did it to get her likes and views up from nikkasShe won